Literature DB >> 24663382

Interplay Between Conceptual Expectations and Movement Predictions Underlies Action Understanding.

Sasha Ondobaka1, Floris P de Lange1, Marco Wittmann1, Chris D Frith2, Harold Bekkering1.   

Abstract

Recent accounts of understanding goal-directed action underline the importance of a hierarchical predictive architecture. However, the neural implementation of such an architecture remains elusive. In the present study, we used functional neuroimaging to quantify brain activity associated with predicting physical movements, as they were modulated by conceptual-expectations regarding the purpose of the object involved in the action. Participants observed object-related actions preceded by a cue that generated both conceptual goal expectations and movement goal predictions. In 2 tasks, observers judged whether conceptual or movement goals matched or mismatched the cue. At the conceptual level, expected goals specifically recruited the posterior cingulate cortex, irrespectively of the task and the perceived movement goal. At the movement level, neural activation of the parieto-frontal circuit, including inferior frontal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobe, reflected unpredicted movement goals. Crucially, this movement prediction error was only present when the purpose of the involved object was expected. These findings provide neural evidence that prior conceptual expectations influence processing of physical movement goals and thereby support the hierarchical predictive account of action processing.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action hierarchy; action perception; active inference; anticipation; predictive coding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24663382     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  10 in total

1.  I know what I will see: action-specific motor preparation activity in a passive observation task.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Donatella Spinelli; Sabrina Pitzalis; Maria Assunta Giusti; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Transsaccadic Perception Deficits in Schizophrenia Reflect the Improper Internal Monitoring of Eye Movement Rather Than Abnormal Sensory Processing.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Barbara L Schwartz; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-06-27

3.  Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanisms: Comment on Osiurak and Badets (2016).

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Mirror neuron brain regions contribute to identifying actions, but not intentions.

Authors:  Emma L Thompson; Geoffrey Bird; Caroline Catmur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 5.399

5.  Changing ideas about others' intentions: updating prior expectations tunes activity in the human motor system.

Authors:  Pierre O Jacquet; Alice C Roy; Valérian Chambon; Anna M Borghi; Roméo Salemme; Alessandro Farnè; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Neural coding of prior expectations in hierarchical intention inference.

Authors:  Valerian Chambon; Philippe Domenech; Pierre O Jacquet; Guillaume Barbalat; Sophie Bouton; Elisabeth Pacherie; Etienne Koechlin; Chlöé Farrer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The role of interoceptive inference in theory of mind.

Authors:  Sasha Ondobaka; James Kilner; Karl Friston
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Real-Time Prediction of Observed Action Requires Integrity of the Dorsal Premotor Cortex: Evidence From Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Louisa F M Brich; Christine Bächle; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Waltraud Stadler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Prediction error induced motor contagions in human behaviors.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ikegami; Gowrishankar Ganesh; Tatsuya Takeuchi; Hiroki Nakamoto
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Seeing the Unexpected: How Brains Read Communicative Intent through Kinematics.

Authors:  James P Trujillo; Irina Simanova; Asli Özyürek; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.