| Literature DB >> 24663341 |
Lenka Benova1, Oona M R Campbell2, George B Ploubidis1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health-seeking behaviour lies on the direct pathway between socio-economic position (SEP) and health outcomes. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise evidence of socio-economic gradients in health-seeking behaviours related to maternal and child health in Egypt.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24663341 PMCID: PMC3963988 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
MeSH and text search terms used in databases searched according to algorithm (1 AND 2 AND 3).
| Search Concept | Text search terms | MeSH terms |
|
| (Medline, Embase, Global Health and Web of Science) | (Medline, Embase and Global Health) |
|
| ((health OR health-care OR healthcare OR health-related OR provider OR help OR care OR therap |
|
|
| socio-economic OR socioeconomic OR social status OR social class OR social position OR economic position OR poverty OR inequalit |
|
|
| Egypt |
|
* Truncation symbol.
Figure 1Systematic review search and inclusion flowchart.
Descriptive characteristics of included maternal health-seeking behaviour studies.
| # | Author, Year | Study design | Study sample and objective | Exposure: SEP definition | Outcome: Health-seeking behaviour(s) – type, definition and level in sample |
| 1 | Abdel Houssein, 1997 | Cross-sectional | Pregnant women in third trimester attending 6 randomly selected MCH centers in Alexandria, all pregnant women in third trimester interviewed (no date of study provided), n = 240. SEP: One of risk factors. |
|
|
| 2 | Yassin et al., 2003 | Cross-sectional | 6 villages in Beni Sueif, all mothers of children less than one year old living in an area around a sentinel site (no date of study provided), n = 231. SEP: One of risk factors. |
|
|
| 3 | Gwatkin et al., 2007 | Cross-sectional | EDHS 1995, 2000. Population representative sample of ever-married women. Last birth among women with at least one birth in the five years preceding the survey, n: 1995 = 7797, 2000 = 7953. SEP: Main determinant. |
|
|
| 4 | Khadr, 2009 | Cross-sectional | EDHS 1995, 2000, 2005 Population representative sample of ever-married women. Last birth among currently married women with at least one birth in the 5-years preceding survey; n: 1995 = 7828, 2000 = 7823, 2005 = 9744. SEP: Main determinant. |
|
|
| 5 | Chiang et al., 2012 | Cross-sectional | 2007 survey of married women <50 years from a Giza village, n = 189. SEP: One of risk factors. |
|
|
| 6 | Stephenson et al., 2012 | Cross-sectional | EDHS 2008. Population representative sample of ever-married women. Last birth among women with at least one birth in the five years preceding the survey, n = 7813. SEP: One of risk factors. |
|
|
EDHS – Egypt Demographic and Health Survey. Measures of SEP: IS: Individual – self, IO: Individual– other (spouse, mother, etc), HH: Household-level, C: Community-level.
Descriptive characteristics of included child health-seeking behaviour studies.
| # | Author, Year | Study design | Study sample and objective | Exposure: SEP – type, definition, level in sample | Outcome: Health-seeking behaviour(s) – type, definition and level in sample |
| 1 | Reichler et al., 1998 | Cross-sectional | Nationally-representative survey of children under 48 months of age surveyed one month after second National Immunisation Day (NID, polio) round in 1995, n = 4188 children from 3216 households. SEP: One of risk factors. |
|
|
| 2 | Yount, 2003 | Cross-sectional. | Two Governorates Linkages Survey 1995–1997, children <5 years with diarrhoea in past 2 weeks in 12 rural villages of Minya governorate, n = 129 children, 152 episodes of care-seeking. SEP: Confounder in analysis of gender. |
| If reported symptoms of diarrhoea: |
| 3 | Yount, 2004 | Cross-sectional | Two Governorates Linkages Survey 1995–1997, Minya governorate, children <5 years of age of currently married women who were sick in 2 weeks before interview, n = 1579. SEP: One of risk factors. |
| If reported symptoms of illness (with diarrhoea, fever, cough or rash): |
| 4 | Fadel, et al. 2007 | Pros-pective cohort | 257 healthy infants (0–9 months) followed for 12 months (October 1999–October 2000) in Assiut university primary health center catchment area, n = 631 diarrhoeal episodes. SEP: One of risk factors. |
| If reported symptoms of diarrhoea in preceding 2 weeks: |
| 5 | Gwatkin,et al, 2007 | Cross-sectional | EDHS 1995, 2000 (children under 5 years), n immunization: 1995 = 2085, 2000 = 2170; treatment for ARI: 1995 = 2479, 2000 = 1032; treatment for fever: 1995 = 4295, 2000 = 1923; treatment for diarrhoea: 1995 = 1701, 2000 = 771. SEP: Main determinant. |
|
|
EDHS – Egypt Demographic and Health Survey EGP – Egyptian pound BCG – Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (TB) DPT- Diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough) and tetanus. Measures of SEP: IO: Individual – other (spouse, mother, etc), HH: Household-level.
Figure 2Maternal and child health-seeking behaviours analysed in included studies.
Summary of results from included maternal health-seeking studies.
| # | Author, Year | Statistical method, type of analysis, effect estimate | Results and confounders (if applicable) |
| 1 | Abdel Houssein, 1997 |
|
|
| 2 | Yassin et al., 2003 |
|
|
| 3 | Gwatkin et al., 2007 |
|
|
| 4 | Khadr, 2009 |
|
|
| 5 | Chiang et al., 2012 |
|
|
| 6 | Stephenson et al., 2012 |
|
|
* Only values of standard error (SE) were provided by this study. Binary significance levels (<0.05, >0.05) were calculated by multiplying the SE by 1.96 to obtain the upper and lower confidence intervals.
Summary of results from included child health-seeking studies.
| # | Author, Year | Statistical method, type of analysis, effect estimate | Results and confounders (if applicable) |
| 1 | Reichler et al., 1998 |
| Children in households with a radio were more likely to have received 2 doses (77%) than one (69%) or no doses of OPV (72%), p<0.01. Children in households with a TV were more likely to have received 2 doses (94%) than one (86%) or no doses of OPV (84%), p<0.001. |
| 2 | Yount, 2003 |
|
|
| 3 | Yount, 2004 |
|
|
| 4 | Fadel, et al. 2007 |
|
|
| 5 | Gwatkin, et al, 2007 |
|
|
* Only values of standard error (SE) were provided by this study. Binary significance levels (<0.05, >0.05) were calculated by multiplying the SE by 1.96 to obtain the upper and lower confidence intervals.
Risk of bias in included studies.
| Health-seeking behaviour | Maternal | Child | ||||||||||
| Risk of bias category | Study | Abdel Houssein, 1997 | Yassin, 2003 | Gwatkin, 2007 | Khadr, 2009 | Chiang 2012 | Stephenson, 2012 | Reichler, 1998 | Yount, 2003 | Yount, 2004 | Fadel,2007 | Gwatkin, 2007 |
|
| Representativeness (consecutive or obviously representative) | − | ? | + | + | ? | + | + | ? | ? | ? | + |
| Missing data or loss to follow up minimal | ? | ? | + | + | ? | + | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | |
|
| Clear definition of exposure | − | + | ? | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + | ? |
| Ascertainment of exposure | ? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? | + | |
|
| Clear definition of outcome | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? | ? | + | + |
| Ascertainment of outcome | − | + | ? | ? | + | + | ? | + | + | + | ? | |
|
| Statistical test used to analyze the data is clearly described | + | + | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + | + |
| Minimal adjustment for age (maternal, child), parity (maternal) and gender (child) | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | |
| Correctly adjusting for several indicators of SEP | − | NA | NA | NA | NA | − | NA | − | − | − | NA | |
SEP – socio-economic position, HSB – health-seeking behaviour.
* Presenting a test of statistical significance was one of the inclusion criteria.
NA – not applicable (no adjusted analysis was conducted).
Key: + Low risk of bias, ? Potential/unclear risk of bias, - High risk of bias.