Literature DB >> 24663187

Impact of reference population on accuracy of imputation from 6K to 50K single nucleotide polymorphism chips in purebred and crossbreed beef cattle.

R V Ventura1, D Lu, F S Schenkel, Z Wang, C Li, S P Miller.   

Abstract

Genotyping with lower density but lower cost panels enables more animals to be genotyped for genomic selection. Imputation enables the determination of missing SNP genotypes in animals genotyped with a low-density panel by using information from a reference population genotyped with a higher density panel, which should increase accuracy of genomic EBV. In this study, population imputation, using linkage disequilibrium among markers, was implemented using the software BEAGLE, FIMPUTE 2.2, and IMPUTE2 in a multibreed, crossbred taurine beef cattle population genotyped with the Illumina SNP50. Different combinations of reference populations and imputed animals were defined based on breed composition. Number of animals (n = 250 to 4,932) and the presence of closer relatives in the reference population (only for Angus animals) were investigated. The overall average imputation accuracy for purebred animals ranged from 94.20 to 97.93% using FIMPUTE, from 95.35 to 98.31% using IMPUTE2, and from 90.02 to 96.38% when BEAGLE software was used. Imputation accuracy of crossbred animals ranged from 54.15 to 97.53% (FIMPUTE), from 57.04 to 97.46% (IMPUTE2), and from 54.35 to 95.64% (BEAGLE). Higher imputation accuracies were obtained when closer relatives along with the breed composition of imputed animals was well represented in the reference population. Within breed imputation from 6K to 50K did not improve when an additional purebred population was added to the reference population. FIMPUTE reduced the run time by 13 to 52 times compared to BEAGLE and 51 to 108 times compared to IMPUTE2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24663187     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  High-depth whole genome sequencing of an Ashkenazi Jewish reference panel: enhancing sensitivity, accuracy, and imputation.

Authors:  Todd Lencz; Jin Yu; Cameron Palmer; Shai Carmi; Danny Ben-Avraham; Nir Barzilai; Susan Bressman; Ariel Darvasi; Judy H Cho; Lorraine N Clark; Zeynep H Gümüş; Vijai Joseph; Robert Klein; Steven Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Harry Ostrer; Laurie J Ozelius; Inga Peter; Gil Atzmon; Itsik Pe'er
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.

Authors:  Garrett M See; Justin S Fix; Clint R Schwab; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Assessing single-nucleotide polymorphism selection methods for the development of a low-density panel optimized for imputation in South African Drakensberger beef cattle.

Authors:  Simon F Lashmar; Donagh P Berry; Rian Pierneef; Farai C Muchadeyi; Carina Visser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.

Authors:  Tao Xiang; Peipei Ma; Tage Ostersen; Andres Legarra; Ole F Christensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.

Authors:  Mario L Piccoli; José Braccini; Fernando F Cardoso; Medhi Sargolzaei; Steven G Larmer; Flávio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs.

Authors:  Claudia A Sevillano; Jeremie Vandenplas; John W M Bastiaansen; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.

Authors:  Marzieh Heidaritabar; Mario P L Calus; Addie Vereijken; Martien A M Groenen; John W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.

Authors:  Tatiane C S Chud; Ricardo V Ventura; Flavio S Schenkel; Roberto Carvalheiro; Marcos E Buzanskas; Jaqueline O Rosa; Maurício de Alvarenga Mudadu; Marcos Vinicius G B da Silva; Fabiana B Mokry; Cintia R Marcondes; Luciana C A Regitano; Danísio P Munari
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Imputation Accuracy from Low to Moderate Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Chips in a Thai Multibreed Dairy Cattle Population.

Authors:  Danai Jattawa; Mauricio A Elzo; Skorn Koonawootrittriron; Thanathip Suwanasopee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population.

Authors:  Ricardo V Ventura; Stephen P Miller; Ken G Dodds; Benoit Auvray; Michael Lee; Matthew Bixley; Shannon M Clarke; John C McEwan
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.