| Literature DB >> 24663113 |
Fangfang Yang1, Lijuan Long2, Xiumei Sun3, Hualian Wu4, Tao Li5, Wenzhou Xiang6.
Abstract
Lipid production is an important indicator for assessing microalgal species for biodiesel production. In this work, the effects of medium composition on lipid production by Scenedesmus sp. were investigated using the response surface methodology. The results of a Plackett-Burman design experiment revealed that NaHCO₃, NaH₂PO4·2H₂O and NaNO₃ were three factors significantly influencing lipid production, which were further optimized by a Box-Behnken design. The optimal medium was found to contain 3.07 g L⁻¹ NaHCO₃, 15.49 mg L⁻¹ NaH₂PO4·2H₂O and 803.21 mg L⁻¹ NaNO₃. Using the optimal conditions previously determined, the lipid production (304.02 mg·L⁻¹) increased 54.64% more than that using the initial medium, which agreed well with the predicted value 309.50 mg L⁻¹. Additionally, lipid analysis found that palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (C18:1) dominantly constituted the algal fatty acids (about 60% of the total fatty acids) and a much higher content of neutral lipid accounted for 82.32% of total lipids, which strongly proved that Scenedesmus sp. is a very promising feedstock for biodiesel production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24663113 PMCID: PMC3967207 DOI: 10.3390/md12031245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Results and experimental layout of Scenedesmus sp. in a Plackett–Burman design.
| Run | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | Lipid production (mg·L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 200 | 25 | 1000 | 40 | 100 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 230.38 |
| 2 | 1 | 200 | 100 | 250 | 40 | 100 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 174.27 |
| 3 | 4 | 50 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 188.56 |
| 4 | 1 | 200 | 25 | 1000 | 40 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 208.85 |
| 5 | 1 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 40 | 100 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 152.85 |
| 6 | 1 | 50 | 25 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 199.58 |
| 7 | 4 | 50 | 25 | 250 | 40 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 215.37 |
| 8 | 4 | 200 | 25 | 250 | 10 | 100 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 214.41 |
| 9 | 4 | 200 | 100 | 250 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 173.23 |
| 10 | 1 | 200 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 20 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 166.16 |
| 11 | 4 | 50 | 100 | 1000 | 40 | 20 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 188.82 |
| 12 | 1 | 50 | 25 | 250 | 10 | 20 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 196.58 |
X1, NaHCO3 (g·L−1); X2, KCl (mg·L−1); X3, NaH2PO4·2H2O (mg·L−1); X4, NaNO3 (mg·L−1); X5, CaCl2 (mg·L−1); X6, MgSO4·7H2O (mg·L−1); X7, EDTA-Fe3+ (mL·L−1); X8, A5 solution (mL·L−1); X9, soil extract (mL·L−1).
Statistical analysis of the Plackett–Burman experiment design.
| Factor | Level | Effect | Sum of Squares | Contribution % | Coefficient Estimate | Effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 +1 | ||||||||
| NaHCO3 | 1 | 4 | 18.7476 | 1,054.3100 | 18.2703 | 9.37 | 0.0034 | 0.0015 a |
| KCl | 50 | 200 | 4.2567 | 54.3576 | 0.9420 | 1.9608 | 0.1537 | — |
| NaH2PO4·2H2O | 25 | 100 | −36.8800 | 4080.4000 | 70.7096 | −18.6075 | 0.0006 | <0.0001 a |
| NaNO3 | 250 | 1000 | 9.2733 | 257.9840 | 4.4706 | 4.4692 | 0.0582 | 0.0477 a |
| CaCl2 | 10 | 40 | 5.3367 | 85.4400 | 1.4806 | 2.8358 | 0.1306 | — |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 20 | 100 | 1.8400 | 10.1568 | 0.1760 | 1.0875 | 0.3203 | — |
| EDTA-Fe3+ | 0.5 | 2 | 1.7767 | 9.4696 | 0.1641 | 1.0558 | 0.2877 | — |
| A5 | 0.5 | 2 | −2.7767 | 23.1296 | 0.4008 | −1.5558 | 0.1907 | — |
| Soil extract | 0.5 | 2 | −5.5967 | 93.9680 | 1.6284 | −2.6308 | 0.1046 | — |
a Significance level at a p-value less than 5%; —, significance level at a p-value of more than 5%, R2 = 0.9345; Radj2 = 0.9099; Rpred2 = 0.8526; coefficient of variation (CV) = 3.57.
Experimental design and lipid production in the Box-Behnken design.
| Run | NaHCO3 (g L−1) | NaH2PO4·2H2O (mg L−1) | NaNO3 (mg L−1) | Lipid production (mg L−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 10 | 750 | 207.53 | 207.77 |
| 2 | 4 | 10 | 750 | 211.29 | 209.08 |
| 3 | 2 | 20 | 750 | 186.23 | 188.44 |
| 4 | 4 | 20 | 750 | 229.44 | 229.20 |
| 5 | 2 | 15 | 500 | 171.96 | 166.17 |
| 6 | 4 | 15 | 500 | 201.35 | 198.01 |
| 7 | 2 | 15 | 1000 | 203.78 | 207.12 |
| 8 | 4 | 15 | 1000 | 211.58 | 217.37 |
| 9 | 3 | 10 | 500 | 240.55 | 246.1 |
| 10 | 3 | 20 | 500 | 200.97 | 204.55 |
| 11 | 3 | 10 | 1000 | 237.89 | 234.31 |
| 12 | 3 | 20 | 1000 | 282.19 | 276.64 |
| 13 | 3 | 15 | 750 | 304.86 | 307.51 |
| 14 | 3 | 15 | 750 | 305.22 | 307.51 |
| 15 | 3 | 15 | 750 | 310.39 | 307.51 |
| 16 | 3 | 15 | 750 | 301.35 | 307.51 |
| 17 | 3 | 15 | 750 | 315.74 | 307.51 |
Statistical analysis of the Box−Behnken experiment design.
| Factor | Sum of squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean square | Coefficient Estimate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 38,929.9101 | 9 | 4,325.5456 | 307.5120 | 96.8736 | <0.0001 |
| NaHCO3 | 885.3632 | 1 | 885.3632 | 10.5200 | 19.8283 | 0.0030 |
| NaH2PO4·2H2O | 0.3081 | 1 | 0.3081 | 0.1963 | 0.0069 | 0.9361 |
| NaNO3 | 1,818.3465 | 1 | 1,818.3465 | 15.0763 | 40.7231 | 0.0004 |
| NaHCO3*NaH2PO4·2H2O | 389.0756 | 1 | 389.0756 | 9.8625 | 8.7136 | 0.0213 |
| NaHCO3*NaNO3 | 116.5320 | 1 | 116.5320 | −5.3975 | 2.6098 | 0.1502 |
| NaH2PO4·2H2O*NaNO3 | 1,758.9636 | 1 | 1,758.9396 | 20.9700 | 39.3932 | 0.0004 |
| NaHCO32 | 21,261.7504 | 1 | 21,261.7504 | −71.0610 | 476.1715 | <0.0001 |
| NaH2PO4·2H2O 2 | 3,260.7386 | 1 | 3,260.7386 | −27.8285 | 73.0265 | <0.0001 |
| NaNO32 | 6,497.6563 | 1 | 6,497.6563 | −39.2835 | 145.5195 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 312.5602 | 7 | 44.6515 | |||
| Lack of fit | 186.3207 | 3 | 62.1069 | 1.9679 | 0.2609 | |
| Pure error | 126.2395 | 4 | 31.5599 | |||
| Corr. total | 39,242.4703 | 16 | ||||
| Model | 38,929.9101 | 9 | 4,325.5456 | 307.5120 | 96.8736 | <0.0001 |
R2 = 0.9920; Radj2 = 0.9818; Rpred2 = 0.9190; coefficient of variation (CV) = 2.76.
Figure 1Three-dimensional response surface plots for lipid production showing the interactions effects of (A) NaHCO3 and NaH2PO4·2H2O; (B) NaH2PO4·2H2O and NaNO3; and (C) NaHCO3 and NaNO3.
Fatty acid composition of Scenedesmus sp. (a) in the original medium; (b) in the optimized medium. Values were given as the means of total FAME percentage ± standard deviation.
| Fatty acid (%) | C16:0 | C16:1 | C16:2 | C18:0 | C18:1 | C18:2 | C18:3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 29.43 ± 1.75 | 1.99 ± 0.69 | 2.42 ± 0.24 | 7.33 ± 0.13 | 30.04 ± 1.02 | 13.60 ± 0.45 | 12.76 ± 0.26 |
| b | 30.77 ± 0.76 | 1.96 ± 0.54 | 1.37 ± 0.02 | 3.41 ± 0.09 | 36.27 ± 0.78 | 11.55 ± 0.12 | 12.52 ± 0.39 |
Lipid class analysis of Scenedesmus sp. (a) in the original medium; (b) in the optimized medium.
| Lipid class | Composition (wt% of total lipids) | |
|---|---|---|
| a | b | |
| Neutral lipid | 81.29 ± 0.65 | 82.32 ± 0.89 |
| Glycolipid | 12.56 ± 0.53 | 10.93 ± 0.47 |
| Phospholipid | 6.14 ± 0.35 | 6.74 ± 0.76 |