Literature DB >> 24663005

Do American goldfinches see their world like passive prey foragers? A study on visual fields, retinal topography, and sensitivity of photoreceptors.

Patrice E Baumhardt1, Bret A Moore, Megan Doppler, Esteban Fernández-Juricic.   

Abstract

Several species of the most diverse avian order, Passeriformes, specialize in foraging on passive prey, although relatively little is known about their visual systems. We tested whether some components of the visual system of the American goldfinch (Spinus tristis), a granivorous bird, followed the profile of species seeking passive food items (small eye size relative to body mass, narrow binocular fields and blind areas, centrally located retinal specialization projecting laterally, ultraviolet-sensitive vision). We measured eye size, visual field configuration, the degree of eye movement, variations in the density of ganglion cells and cone photoreceptors, and the sensitivity of photoreceptor visual pigments and oil droplets. Goldfinches had relatively large binocular (46°) and lateral (134°) visual fields with a high degree of eye movement (66° at the plane of the bill). They had a single centrotemporally located fovea that projects laterally, but can be moved closer to the edge of the binocular field by converging the eyes. Goldfinches could also increase their panoramic vision by diverging their eyes while handling food items in head-up positions. The distribution of photoreceptors indicated that the highest density of single and double cones was surrounding the fovea, making it the center of chromatic and achromatic vision and motion detection. Goldfinches possessed a tetrachromatic ultraviolet visual system with visual pigment peak sensitivities of 399 nm (ultraviolet-sensitive cone), 442 nm (short-wavelength-sensitive cone), 512 nm (medium-wavelength-sensitive cone), and 580 nm (long-wavelength-sensitive cone). Overall, the visual system of American goldfinches showed characteristics of passive as well as active prey foragers, with a single-fovea configuration and a large degree of eye movement that would enhance food searching and handling with their relatively wide binocular fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24663005     DOI: 10.1159/000357750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  6 in total

1.  Mimicry-dependent lateralization in the visual inspection of foreign eggs by American robins.

Authors:  Hannah M Scharf; Katharine Stenstrom; Miri Dainson; Thomas J Benson; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Individual variation in cone photoreceptor density in house sparrows: implications for between-individual differences in visual resolution and chromatic contrast.

Authors:  Amanda L Ensminger; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Orientation of Visual Space from the Perspective of Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Luke P Tyrrell; Benjamin Goller; Bret A Moore; Douglas L Altshuler; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Does retinal configuration make the head and eyes of foveate birds move?

Authors:  Bret A Moore; Luke P Tyrrell; Diana Pita; Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Avian UV vision enhances leaf surface contrasts in forest environments.

Authors:  Cynthia Tedore; Dan-Eric Nilsson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Testing a key assumption in animal communication: between-individual variation in female visual systems alters perception of male signals.

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Amanda L Ensminger; Matthew D Shawkey; Jeffrey R Lucas; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.