Literature DB >> 24662855

Thromboelastogram-guided enoxaparin dosing does not confer protection from deep venous thrombosis: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Scott G Louis1, Philbert Y Van, Gordon M Riha, Jeffrey S Barton, Nicholas R Kunio, Samantha J Underwood, Jerome A Differding, Elizabeth Rick, Enrique Ginzburg, Martin A Schreiber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) remains high in general surgery and trauma patients despite widespread prophylaxis with enoxaparin. A recent study demonstrated decreased incidence of DVT if patients on enoxaparin had a change in R time (ΔR) of greater than 1 minute when heparinase-activated thromboelastography (TEG) was compared with normal TEG. We hypothesized that using ΔR-guided dosing would result in decreased DVT rates.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed at a Level 1 trauma center. Both trauma and general surgery patients were included. Upon enrollment, demographic data including age, sex, body mass index, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score were obtained. Enrolled patients were randomized to standard (30 mg twice a day) or TEG-guided dosing. Dose-adjusted patients underwent daily enoxaparin titration to achieve an ΔR of 1 minute to 2 minutes. Venous thromboembolism screening was performed per institutional protocol. Antithrombin III (AT-III) and anti-Xa levels were drawn at peak enoxaparin concentrations.
RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were enrolled. There was no difference in demographic data between the groups. No pulmonary emboli were identified. The control group had a DVT rate of 16%, while the experimental group had a rate of 14% (p = nonsignificant). The experimental group's median enoxaparin dosage, 50 mg twice a day, was significantly higher than that of the control (p < 0.01). TEG ΔR was not different between the control and experimental groups. Beginning at Day 3, anti-Xa levels were higher in the experimental group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in AT-III activity between the two groups; 67% of the patients demonstrated AT-III deficiency.
CONCLUSION: TEG adjusted enoxaparin dosing led to significant increases in anti-Xa activity, which did not correlate with a decreased DVT rate. Failure to reduce the DVT rate and increase ΔR despite increased dosing and increased anti-Xa activity is consistent with the high rate of AT-III deficiency detected in this study cohort. These data suggest that the future of DVT prevention may not lie in the optimization of low molecular weight heparin therapy but rather in compounds that increase antithrombin directly or operate independently of the AT-III pathway. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662855     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  11 in total

1.  Dynamic coagulability after injury: Is delaying venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis worth the wait?

Authors:  Joshua J Sumislawski; Lucy Z Kornblith; Amanda S Conroy; Rachael A Callcut; Mitchell Jay Cohen
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Challenging Traditional Paradigms in Posttraumatic Pulmonary Thromboembolism.

Authors:  M Margaret Knudson; Ernest E Moore; Lucy Z Kornblith; Amy M Shui; Scott Brakenridge; Brandon R Bruns; Mark D Cipolle; Todd W Costantini; Bruce A Crookes; Elliott R Haut; Andrew J Kerwin; Laszlo N Kiraly; Lisa M Knowlton; Matthew J Martin; Michelle K McNutt; David J Milia; Alicia Mohr; Ram Nirula; Fredrick B Rogers; Thomas M Scalea; Sherry L Sixta; David A Spain; Charles E Wade; George C Velmahos
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 16.681

3.  Admission thrombelastography does not guide dose adjustment of enoxaparin in trauma patients.

Authors:  Hannah V Hayes; Molly E Droege; Craig J Furnish; Michael D Goodman; Neil E Ernst; Christopher A Droege
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-14

4.  Association of Anti-Factor Xa-Guided Dosing of Enoxaparin With Venous Thromboembolism After Trauma.

Authors:  Charles A Karcutskie; Arjuna Dharmaraja; Jaimin Patel; Sarah A Eidelson; Anish B Padiadpu; Arch G Martin; Gabriel Lama; Edward B Lineen; Nicholas Namias; Carl I Schulman; Kenneth G Proctor
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Impact of antithrombin III and enoxaparin dosage adjustment on prophylactic anti-Xa concentrations in trauma patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Molly Elizabeth Droege; Christopher Allen Droege; Carolyn Dosen Philpott; Megan Leslie Webb; Neil Edward Ernst; Krishna Athota; Devin Wakefield; Joseph Richard Dowd; Dina Gomaa; Bryce H R Robinson; Dennis Hanseman; Joel Elterman; Eric William Mueller
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Coagulative safety of epidural catheters after major upper gastrointestinal surgery: advanced and routine coagulation analysis in 38 patients.

Authors:  Owain Thomas; Hampus Rein; Karin Strandberg; Ulf Schött
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-10-18

7.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the trauma intensive care unit: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document.

Authors:  Joseph F Rappold; Forest R Sheppard; Samuel P Carmichael Ii; Joseph Cuschieri; Eric Ley; Erika Rangel; Anupamaa J Seshadri; Christopher P Michetti
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-02-24

8.  Laboratory assessment of anti-thrombotic therapy in heart failure, atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease: insights using thrombelastography and a micro-titre plate assay of thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis.

Authors:  Y C Lau; Q Xiong; P Ranjit; G Y H Lip; A D Blann
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Thromboelastometry versus free-oscillation rheometry and enoxaparin versus tinzaparin: an in-vitro study comparing two viscoelastic haemostatic tests' dose-responses to two low molecular weight heparins at the time of withdrawing epidural catheters from ten patients after major surgery.

Authors:  Owain Thomas; Anna Larsson; Nahreen Tynngård; Ulf Schött
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Thromboelastography for the monitoring of the antithrombotic effect of low-molecular-weight heparin after major orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Nilgün Tekkesin; Mustafa Tekkesin; Güzin Kaso
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.596

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.