Literature DB >> 24662716

Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009.

Amos Grünebaum1, Laurence B McCullough2, Katherine J Sapra3, Robert L Brent4, Malcolm I Levene5, Birgit Arabin6, Frank A Chervenak7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined neonatal mortality in relation to birth settings and birth attendants in the United States from 2006 through 2009. STUDY
DESIGN: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-linked birth and infant death dataset in the United States from 2006 through 2009 were used to assess early and total neonatal mortality for singleton, vertex, and term births without congenital malformations delivered by midwives and physicians in the hospital and midwives and others out of the hospital. Deliveries by hospital midwives served as the reference.
RESULTS: Midwife home births had a significantly higher total neonatal mortality risk than deliveries by hospital midwives (1.26 per 1000 births; relative risk [RR], 3.87 vs 0.32 per 1000; P < .001). Midwife home births of 41 weeks or longer (1.84 per 1000; RR, 6.76 vs 0.27 per 1000; P < .001) and midwife home births of women with a first birth (2.19 per 1000; RR, 6.74 vs 0.33 per 1000; P < .001) had significantly higher risks of total neonatal mortality than deliveries by hospital midwives. In midwife home births, neonatal mortality for first births was twice that of subsequent births (2.19 vs 0.96 per 1000; P < .001). Similar results were observed for early neonatal mortality. The excess total neonatal mortality for midwife home births compared with midwife hospital births was 9.32 per 10,000 births, and the excess early neonatal mortality was 7.89 per 10,000 births.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows a significantly increased total and early neonatal mortality for home births and even higher risks for women of 41 weeks or longer and women having a first birth. These significantly increased risks of neonatal mortality in home births must be disclosed by all obstetric practitioners to all pregnant women who express an interest in such births.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth attendants; birth settings; home births; midwives; neonatal mortality; physicians

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662716     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Planned Out-of-Hospital Birth and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Ellen L Tilden; Janice Snyder; Brian Quigley; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Melissa Cheyney; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Cathy Emeis; Jodi Lapidus; Frances M Biel; Jack Wiedrick; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Out-of-hospital deliveries: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lima Diana; Lima Glaucia; Cersosimo Adriana; Figueiredo Israel
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Baseline population health conditions ahead of a health system strengthening program in rural Madagascar.

Authors:  Ann C Miller; Ranto H Ramananjato; Andres Garchitorena; Victor R Rabeza; Djordje Gikic; Amber Cripps; Laura Cordier; Hery-Tiana Rahaniraka Razanadrakato; Marius Randriamanambintsoa; Lara Hall; Megan Murray; Felicite Safara Razanavololo; Michael L Rich; Matthew H Bonds
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 5.  Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08

6.  Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Robert L Brent; Malcolm I Levene; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Celia P Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Mark Tracy; Rea Daellenbach; Mary Kensington; Amy Monk; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Frequency and severity of prehospital obstetric events encountered by emergency medical services in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca E Cash; Robert A Swor; Margaret Samuels-Kalow; David Eisenbrey; Anjali J Kaimal; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.