Literature DB >> 24662333

A microRNA-based test improves endoscopic ultrasound-guided cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Randall E Brand1, Alex T Adai2, Barbara A Centeno3, Linda S Lee4, George Rateb5, Shivakumar Vignesh3, Charles Menard5, Anna Wiechowska-Kozłowska6, Hubert Bołdys7, Marek Hartleb7, Michael K Sanders1, Johanna B Munding8, Andrea Tannapfel8, Stephan A Hahn9, Ludomir Stefańczyk10, Gregory J Tsongalis11, David C Whitcomb1, Darwin L Conwell4, Jean A Morisset5, Timothy B Gardner11, Stuart R Gordon11, Arief A Suriawinata11, Maura B Lloyd2, Dennis Wylie2, Emmanuel Labourier2, Bernard F Andruss2, Anna E Szafranska-Schwarzbach12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in combination with cytopathology is the optimal method for diagnosis and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other pancreatic lesions. Its clinical utility, however, can be limited by high rates of indeterminate or false-negative results. We aimed to develop and validate a microRNA (miRNA)-based test to improve preoperative detection of PDAC.
METHODS: Levels of miRNAs were analyzed in a centralized clinical laboratory by relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 95 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and 228 samples collected by EUS-FNA during routine evaluations of patients with solid pancreatic masses at 4 institutions in the United States, 1 in Canada, and 1 in Poland.
RESULTS: We developed a 5-miRNA expression classifier, consisting of MIR24, MIR130B, MIR135B, MIR148A, and MIR196, that could identify PDAC in well-characterized, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens. Detection of PDAC in EUS-FNA samples increased from 78.8% by cytology analysis alone (95% confidence interval, 72.2%-84.5%) to 90.8% when combined with miRNA analysis (95% confidence interval, 85.6%-94.5%). The miRNA classifier correctly identified 22 additional true PDAC cases among 39 samples initially classified as benign, indeterminate, or nondiagnostic by cytology. Cytology and miRNA test results each were associated significantly with PDAC (P < .001), with positive predictive values greater than 99% (95% confidence interval, 96%-100%).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a 5-miRNA classifier that can accurately predict which preoperative pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens contain PDAC. This test might aid in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by reducing the number of FNAs without a definitive adenocarcinoma diagnosis, thereby reducing the number of repeat EUS-FNA procedures.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytologic Diagnosis; Fine-Needle Aspirate; MicroRNA; Pancreatic Cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662333     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  14 in total

1.  Informative Patterns of Health-Care Utilization Prior to the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Huiping Xu; Jeffery J Easler; Timothy D Imler; Evgenia Teal; Stuart Sherman; Murray Korc
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Biomarkers of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Classical Laboratory Tools to Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Emilie Viennois; Yuan Zhao; Didier Merlin
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 3.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

4.  The Countdown to a Paradigm Shift in Diagnosing Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  The potential of three whole blood microRNAs to predict outcome and monitor treatment response in sarcoid-bearing equids.

Authors:  E Hamza; J Cosandey; V Gerber; C Koch; L Unger
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Protein Signatures and Tissue Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Patrick W Underwood; Michael H Gerber; Kathy Nguyen; Daniel Delitto; Song Han; Ryan M Thomas; Christopher E Forsmark; Jose G Trevino; William E Gooding; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Comparison of Native Aspirates and Cytological Smears Obtained by EUS-Guided Biopsies for Effective DNA/RNA Marker Testing in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Lucie Benesova; Tereza Halkova; Bohus Bunganic; Barbora Belsanova; Miroslav Zavoral; Eva Traboulsi; Marek Minarik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 8.  microRNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Lorenzo F Sempere; Asfar S Azmi; Anna Moore
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 9.957

9.  Prospective validation of microRNA signatures for detecting pancreatic malignant transformation in endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies.

Authors:  Adam E Frampton; Jonathan Krell; Mireia Mato Prado; Tamara M H Gall; Nima Abbassi-Ghadi; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Niccola Funel; Elisa Giovannetti; Leandro Castellano; Mohamed Basyouny; Nagy A Habib; Harry Kaltsidis; Panagiotis Vlavianos; Justin Stebbing; Long R Jiao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 10.  MicroRNA in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: predictive/prognostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets?

Authors:  Oronzo Brunetti; Antonio Russo; Aldo Scarpa; Daniele Santini; Michele Reni; Alessandro Bittoni; Amalia Azzariti; Giuseppe Aprile; Sabina Delcuratolo; Michele Signorile; Antonio Gnoni; Loredana Palermo; Vito Lorusso; Stefano Cascinu; Nicola Silvestris
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.