Literature DB >> 24662314

Subviral particle as vaccine and vaccine platform.

Ming Tan1, Xi Jiang2.   

Abstract

Recombinant subvirual particles retain similar antigenic features of their authentic viral capsids and thus have been applied as nonreplicating subunit vaccines against viral infection and illness. Additionally, the self-assembled, polyvalent subviral particles are excellent platforms to display foreign antigens for immune enhancement for vaccine development. These subviral particle-based vaccines are noninfectious and thus safer than the conventional live attenuated and inactivated vaccines. While several VLP vaccines are available in the markets, numerous others, including dual vaccines against more than one pathogen, are under clinical or preclinical development. This article provides an update of these efforts.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662314      PMCID: PMC4072748          DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Virol        ISSN: 1879-6257            Impact factor:   7.090


Current Opinion in Virology 2014, 6:24–33 This review comes from a themed issue on Vaccines Edited by Shan Lu For a complete overview see the and the Available online 21st March 2014 1879-6257/$ – see front matter, © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Most viruses share common spherical or rod-shaped capsids built by multiple subunits of capsid proteins that encapsulate the viral genome. Through bioengineering technology viral capsid proteins can be produced in vitro, resulting in self-assembled, empty virus-like particles (VLPs) (reviewed in [1, 2••]). In addition, smaller particles with less subunits can be produced for some viruses by expression of portions of the major viral capsid proteins [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. These artificial subviral particles retain the structures and antigenic properties of their native viruses, including the virus-specific molecular patterns and high density of B-cell and T-cell epitopes to induce potent innate, humoral, and cellular immune responses, respectively, in animals and humans [1, 2••]. Thus, these subviral particles are excellent source of materials for vaccine development against many viruses and their associated diseases. VLPs are usually made by an eukaryotic expression system, including the baculovirus/insect cells, yeast, and mammalian cells, while the smaller subviral particles and hepatitis B virus (HBV) VLPs can be produced through the E. coli expression system (Table 1 ), which is more cost-effective. Sevral subviral particle-based vaccines are currently available in the market, while many others are under clinical or preclinical development.
Table 1

Some known subviral particles that have been studied as vaccines or immunogens

Virus familyVirus speciesSubviral particleProduction systemImmune responses in lab animals (mice)Neutralization/protection against virus and diseases (mice)Clinical trial/commercial useReference
ArteriviridaePRRSVVLPBaculovirusAb, T cellNeutralization[46]



BirnaviridaeIBDVVLPBaculovirusAb (chicken),Neutralization, protection (chicken)[47, 48]



BunyaviridaeRVFVVLPBaculovirusAb, T cell (rat)Neutralization/protection (rat)[49]



CaliciviridaeNoVVLPBaculovirusAb, T cellBlock NoV-receptor interaction, protection (human)Phase I and II[19••, 50]
RHDVVLPBaculovirusAb (rabbit)Protection (rabbit)[51, 52]
NoVP particleE. coliAb, T cellBlock NoV-receptor interaction[9•, 38•]
NoVPolyvalent complexE. coliAb, T cellBlock NoV-receptor interaction[53]



CircoviridaePCVVLPE. coliAb (pig)Protection (pig)Commercial use[17, 18]



CoronaviridaeSARS-CoVVLPBaculovirusT cell[54, 55]
IBVVLPBaculovirusAb, T cell (chicken)Neutralization (chicken)[56]



FiloviridaeEBOVVLPMammalian cellsAb (guinea pig)Protection (guinea pig)[57, 58]



FlaviviridaeHCVVLPBaculovirusAb, T cell (primate)Protection[59, 60, 61, 62]



HepadnaviridaeHBVVLPYeastAb (monkey, chimpanzee)Protection (chimpanzee, human)Commercial use[14, 15]
HBVVLPE. coliAb, T cell (human)Phase I[26, 63]
HBVVLPE. coliAbProtection against B. burgdorferi[64, 65]



HepeviridaeHEVVLPBaculovirusAbProtection (monkey, human)Phase I and II[20, 21, 66, 67]
HEVE2 particleE. coliAb (monkey)Protection (monkey, human)Commercial use[3, 68]



HerpesviridaeEVBVLPHEK293 cell lineAb, T cell[69]



NodaviridaeBVVLPBaculovirusProtection (European Sea Bass)[70, 71]
FHVVLPBaculovirusAb (rat)[72]



OrthomyxoviridaeFlu virusVLPBaculovirusAb, T cell (ferret)Protection (ferret)[73, 74, 75]



ParamyxoviridaeNDVVLPBaculovirusAb (chicken)Protection (chicken)[76]
RSVVLPBaculovirusAbNeutralization/protection[77]



ParvoviridaePPVVLPBaculovirusAb (guinea pig, pig)Protection (pig)[78]
CPVVLPBaculovirus, E. coliAb (dog), T cellProtection (dog)[79, 80, 81]
GPVVLPBaculovirusAb (goose)Neutralization[82]
PV B19VLPBaculovirus, yeastAb (human)Neutralization (human)Phase I[83, 84]



PapillomaviridaeHPVVLPBaculovirus, yeastAb (rabbit)Neutralization, protection (human)Commercial use[10, 11, 12, 13]
HPVCapsomereE. coliAb (dog)Protection (dog)[7, 11, 85, 86]



PicornaviridaeEMCVVLPBaculovirusAb (pig)Neutralization[87]
CVB3VLPBaculovirusAbProtection[88]
CVA16VLPBaculovirusAbProtection[89]
EV71VLPBaculovirus, yeastAb, T-cell (monkey)Neutralization (monkey), protection[90, 91, 92]
FMDVVLPBaculovirus, E. coliAb, T cell (dog, cattle)Protection (guinea pig, dog, cattle)[93, 94]
PyVVLPYeastAb, T cell[95, 96, 97]
PyVVLPYeastT cellProtection[98]
PyVVLPE. coliAbProtection[99]
PyVVLPBaculovirusAb, T cellAgainst tumor growth, protection[100, 101]
PyVPentamer/capsoidE. coliAb (piglet)[102]



PolyomaviridaeSV40VLPBaculovirusAb, T cell[103]



ReoviridaeRVVLPBaculovirus, E. coliAb, T cellProtection (mouse, pig)[104, 105, 106]
BTVVLPBaculovirusAbNeutralization, protection (sheep)[107, 108, 109]



RetroviridaeHIVVLPBaculovirusAb, CTLNeutralization[110]



TogaviridaeCHIKVVLPBaculovirusAb (monkey)Protection (monkey)[111]

Ab, antibody; B. burgdorferi, Borrelia burgdorferi; BV, betanodavirus; BTV, bluetongue virus; CHIKV, chikungunya virus; CoV, coronavirus; CPV, conine parvovirus; CTL, cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte; CVA16, coxsackievirus A-16; CVB3, coxsackievirus B3; E. coli, Escherichia coli; EBOV, ebolavirus; EMCV, encephalomyocarditis virus; EV71, Enterovirus 71; EBV, epstein–barr virus; FHV, flock house virus; Flu virus, influenza virus; FMDV, foot-and-mouth disease virus; GPV, Goose parvovirus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HEV, hepatitis E virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papillomavirus; IBDV, Infectious bursal disease virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; NoV, norovirus; PCV, porcine circovirus; PPV, porcine parvovirus; PRRSV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; PV, parvovirus; PyV, polyomavirus; RV, rotavirus; RHDV, Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; RVFV, Rift Valley fever virus; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; SV40, simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40; VLP, virus-like particle.

Some known subviral particles that have been studied as vaccines or immunogens Ab, antibody; B. burgdorferi, Borrelia burgdorferi; BV, betanodavirus; BTV, bluetongue virus; CHIKV, chikungunya virus; CoV, coronavirus; CPV, conine parvovirus; CTL, cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte; CVA16, coxsackievirus A-16; CVB3, coxsackievirus B3; E. coli, Escherichia coli; EBOV, ebolavirus; EMCV, encephalomyocarditis virus; EV71, Enterovirus 71; EBV, epstein–barr virus; FHV, flock house virus; Flu virus, influenza virus; FMDV, foot-and-mouth disease virus; GPV, Goose parvovirus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HEV, hepatitis E virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papillomavirus; IBDV, Infectious bursal disease virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; NoV, norovirus; PCV, porcine circovirus; PPV, porcine parvovirus; PRRSV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; PV, parvovirus; PyV, polyomavirus; RV, rotavirus; RHDV, Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; RVFV, Rift Valley fever virus; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; SV40, simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40; VLP, virus-like particle. The self-assembled, polyvalent subviral particles are also excellent platforms for antigen presentation to enhance immunogenicity. Through genetic engineering or chemical conjugation heterologous antigens or peptide epitopes can be inserted or conjugated onto the surface of the subviral particles. The polyvalent presentation of the foreign antigens or epitopes on the subviral particles leads to enhanced immunogenicity, providing an effective approach for novel vaccine development. On the other hand, the immunogenicity of the subviral particle is generally maintained without disrupption by the foreign insertion, and thus the chimeric particles can be used as dual or even multivalant vaccines against two or more pathogens. A number of such chimeric particles have been under preclinical development, pointing to a new direction of highly efficient, low cost vaccines against major infectious diseases.

Subviral particles as vaccines

Over 30 different subviral particles (Table 1), representing at least 21 viral families, have been generated so far through recombinant baculovirus, yeast, mammalian cells and E. coli expression systems. Most of them are VLPs comprising one or more full-length viral structural proteins, while others are smaller subviral particles formed by truncated capsid proteins [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. The most complex subviral particles are VLPs of the rotavirus, influenza virus and coronavirus that contain up to four structure proteins. The smaller subviral particles include the E2 particles (∼23 nm) of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) that are composed of the truncated protruding (P) P1 and P2 domains (∼30 kDa) of HEV VP1 [2••, 3, 8] and the P particles (∼20 nm) of norovirus (NoV) that are formed by 24 copies of the P domain (∼34 kDa) of the NoV capsid protein VP1 [4, 6, 9•]. Most subviral particles can be easily produced in the laboratory (Table 1) and several of them have reached the markets as effective vaccines after successfully scaled-up production through Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). These subviral particles are excellent immunogens inducing strong humoral and cellular immune responses as shown by numerous studies (Table 1). Immunization of subviral particle vaccines in different animal species and humans, through various routes, such as intranasal, intramuscular, and intraperitoneal administrations, stimulated high antibody as well as high CD4+ proliferative and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses (Table 1). These features support the subviral partciels to be highly efficient vaccines against many infectous diseases. To date five subviral particle-based vaccines are commercially available for human use. The two VLP vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) are made by L1, the major capsid protein of HPV16 [10], through recombinant yeasts (Gardasil®, Merck & Co., NJ, USA) or baculoviruses in insect cells (Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) [10, 11, 12, 13]. Both vaccines have been proven for the prevention of cervical and anogenital infection and diseases associated with HPVs. The other two commercial VLP vaccines against hepatitis B viruses (HBVs), Recombivax HB® (Merck & Co., NJ, USA) and Engerix-B® (GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK), are made by the small surface antigen of HBV (HBsAg) through recombinant yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) [14, 15]. These vaccines have been proven effective worldwide against HBV infection. Most recently, a further subviral particle vaccine against HEVs, the HEV 239/Hecolin® (Xiamen Innovax Biotech, Xiamen, China) that is made through the E. coli system, has been proven by the Chinese health authorities for human use in China [16]. In addition, there are two other subviral particle vaccines, the Ingelvac CircoFLEX® (Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany) and Porcilis PCV® (Intervet International, The Netherlands), that are commcercially available for use in domestic pigs against porcine circovirus infection and diseases [17, 18]. Furthermore, the NoV VLP vaccine has shown significant protection against NoV diarrhea in phase II clinical trials [19••, 20, 21], while many other subviral particle vaccines are under intensive preclinical development (Table 1).

Subviral particles as vaccine platforms

In addition to being vaccines, the subviral particles can also be used as vaccine platforms to present foreign antigens and small peptide epitopes of heterologous pathogens for novel vaccine development. The highly stable structures of most subviral particles tolerate an exogenous insertion, which can be achieved through either recombinant DNA technology or chemical conjugation. The native antigenic properties of the inserted antigens or epitopes usually are preserved on the surface of the chimeric particles, while the immunogenicity of the antigen/epitope is significantly enhanced by the polyvalent nature of the subviral particles functioning as an adjuvant. In addition, the major antigenic determinants of the subviral particle carriers are generally preserved, and thus the resulting chimeric particles can be used as a dual vaccine against the pathogens of the insertion and the carrier. Numerous chimeric particles with antigen or epitope insertions on the surface have been produced (Table 2 ), in which the foreign antigen is usually inserted into a surface loop of the subviral particles. The capacity of a foreign insertion is subviral particle-dependent, with a maximal insertion of 238 residues (green fluorescence protein, GFP) for the HBV VLP [22] and 159 residues (VP8* antigen of rotavirus) for the P particle of NoV [9] being reported. A selection of proper sites of a subviral particle for insertion of exogenous antigens and/or epitopes is important for the generation of stable chimeric particles, the distal end of a flexible surface loops is generally a good choice.
Table 2

Some subviral particle platforms for display of heterologous antigens and epitopes for vaccine development

Virus speciesSubviral particleDisplayed epitope or antigenProduction systemImmune response in animal (mouse)Neutralization/protection against pathogens and diseases (mouse)Clinical trialReference



Vaccine candidates that are in clinical trials
HBVVLPCSP antigen of P. falciparumYeastAb, T cell (human)Protection against malaria (human)Phase I, II, and III[23•, 24••, 112, 113]
VLPCSP epitopes of P. falciparumE. coliAb (monkey, human)Protection against malaria (monkey)Phase I[25, 26]
VLPM2e epitope (influenza virus)E. coliAbProtectionPhase I[27, 29, 33]
BacteriophageVLPNicotineE. coliAb (human)Increase smoking cessation (human)Phase I, II[34, 35]
VLPAngiotensin II epitopesE. coliAb (rat, human)Reduces blood pressure (rat)Phase I[36]
VLPallergen Der p 1 epitopeE. coliAb (human)Phase I[114]



Some vaccine candidates that are in preclinical development
CPMVVirionVP2 epitope of MEVCowpea leafAbProtection (minks)[115]
VirionProtein F epitope of P. aeruginosaCowpea leafAbprotection[116]
VirionFnBP epitope of T. aureusCowpea leafAbprotection against endocarditis (rat)[117]
FHVVLPToxin of Bacillus anthracisBaculovirusAbNeutralization, protection (rat)[72]
Influenza virusVLPIBV S1 proteinBaculovirusAb, T cell (chicken)Neutralization, protection (chicken)[118]
VLPHA/NA Epitope of NDVBaculovirusAb (chicken)Protection (chicken)[119]
VLPF or G antigen of RSVBaculovirusAbNeutralization/protection[77]
HAVVLPAngiotensin II epitopesBaculovirusAb (rat)Reduced blood pressure (rat)[120]
HBVVLPSP55/SP70 epitopes of EV71E. coliAbNeutralization/protection[121]
VLPepitopes of HCVE. coliAb, T cell, CTL[122]
VLPHVR1 epitope of E2 of HCVE. coliAbNeutralization[123]
VLPEDIII antigen of DENV-2YeastAbNeutralization[124, 125]
VLPE1 epitope of rubella virusE. coliAb[126]
VLPCSP epitopes of P. falciparumE. coliAb, T cell (human)Phase I[26, 63]
VLPOspA antigen of B. burgdorferiE. coliAbProtection[64, 65]
VLPVP2 five-mimotope of IBDVE. coliAb (chicken)Protection (chicken)[127]
VLPCFP-10 antigen of MTBE. coliAb, T cell[128]
HIVVLPDomain III of DENV1 or WNVBaculovirusAbNeutralization[129]
VLPF/G surface antigens of HMPVBaculovirusAbNeutralization/protection[130]
NoVP particleVP8* antigen of RVE. coliAbNeutralization/protection[9]
P particleM2e epitope of influenza virusE. coliAbProtection[41]
Polyvalent complexVP8* antigen of RVE. coliAb, T cellNeutralization/protection[53]
Polyvalent complexM2e epitope of influenza virusE. coliAbprotection[53]
Polyvalent complexP domain antigen of HEVE. coliAbNeutralization[131]
PyVVLPPre-S1 epitope of HBVYeastAb[95]
VLPN-termini of NP of PUUVYeastAb[96]
VLPCTL epitope of mucin 1YeastAb, T cell[97]
VLPGP33 CTL epitope of LCMVYeastT cellProtection[98]
VLPJ8i antigen of GASE. coliAbProtection[99]
VLPHer2 antigens of tumorsBaculovirusT cellProtection against tumor growth[100]
VLPPSA antigens of D2F2 tumorsBaculovirusAb, T cellProtection against tumor growth[101]
VLPH190 epitope of influenza virusE. coliAb[132]
Pentamer capsoidB cell epitopesE. coliAb (pig)[102]
RHDVVLP3A protein epitope of FMDVBaculovirusAb, T cell (pig)[51]
SV40VLPHLA-CTL epitope of flu virusBaculovirusAb, T cellProtection[133]

Ab, antibody; B. burgdorferi, Borrelia burgdorferi; CFP-10, antigen of culture filtrate protein 10; CPMV, cowpea mosaic virus; CSP, circumsporozoite protein; CTL, cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte; DENV-1/2, dengue virus type-1/2; EDIII, envelope domain III; EV71, Enterovirus 71; FHV, Flock House virus; Flu virus, influenza virus; FMDV, foot-and-mouth disease virus; FnBP, fibronectin-binding protein; GAS, Group A streptococcus; GP, glycoprotein; HA/NA, hemagglutinin/neuraminidase; HAV, hepatitis A virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HEV, hepatitis E virus; HMPV, human metapneumovirus; HVR1, hypervariable region 1; IBDV, infectious bursal disease virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; INF, interferon; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; M2e, ectodomain of influenza A virus M2 protein; MEV, Mink enteritis virus; MTB, mycobacterium tuberculosis; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; NP, nucleocapsid protein; NoV, norovirus; P. falciparum, Plasmodium falciparum; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; PyV, polyomavirus; PUUV, Puumala hantavirus; RV, rotavirus; RHDV, rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SV40, simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40; T. aureus, Taphylococcus aureus; VLP, virus-like particle; WNV, West Nile virus.

Some subviral particle platforms for display of heterologous antigens and epitopes for vaccine development Ab, antibody; B. burgdorferi, Borrelia burgdorferi; CFP-10, antigen of culture filtrate protein 10; CPMV, cowpea mosaic virus; CSP, circumsporozoite protein; CTL, cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte; DENV-1/2, dengue virus type-1/2; EDIII, envelope domain III; EV71, Enterovirus 71; FHV, Flock House virus; Flu virus, influenza virus; FMDV, foot-and-mouth disease virus; FnBP, fibronectin-binding protein; GAS, Group A streptococcus; GP, glycoprotein; HA/NA, hemagglutinin/neuraminidase; HAV, hepatitis A virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HEV, hepatitis E virus; HMPV, human metapneumovirus; HVR1, hypervariable region 1; IBDV, infectious bursal disease virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; INF, interferon; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; M2e, ectodomain of influenza A virus M2 protein; MEV, Mink enteritis virus; MTB, mycobacterium tuberculosis; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; NP, nucleocapsid protein; NoV, norovirus; P. falciparum, Plasmodium falciparum; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; PyV, polyomavirus; PUUV, Puumala hantavirus; RV, rotavirus; RHDV, rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SV40, simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40; T. aureus, Taphylococcus aureus; VLP, virus-like particle; WNV, West Nile virus. The HBV VLP has been extensively studied as a vaccine platform for presentation of heterologous antigens and epitopes, with a chimeric VLP vaccines reaching to phase III and other two to phase I human trials. One is the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline) that comprises of the C-terminal half (189 residues) of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) of Plasmodium falciparum on the surface of the HBV VLP (HBsAg) with adjuvant AS01 [23]. This chimeric vaccine is currently under phase III evaluations with high protective efficacy [24] and thus will most likely be the first malaria vaccine ever licensed and the first vaccine with a VLP-displayed antigen. Another VLP-based malaria vaccine is ICC-1132 (Malarivax) that is composed of a HBV VLP (HBcAg) displaying multiple epitopes of the P. falciparum CSP [25, 26]. After testing in rodents and nonhuman primates [25], this vaccine candidate was assessed for safety and immunogenicity by a phase I human trial, which showed malaria- and HBV-specific immune responses [26], supportingg ICC-1132 as a potential dual vaccine. The other HBV VLP-based dual vaccine is the M2e-HBcAg chimera, in which the conserved M2e epitope of influenza A virus M2 protein is linked to the HBV VLP through either recombinant DNA technology [27] or chemical conjugation [28]. After a number of animal experiments showing specific immune reponses against the M2e epitope and HBV, as well as protective immunity against influenza virus infection [28, 29, 30, 31], the the first phase I trial was performed in 2008, demonstrating its safety and immunogenicity in humans [32, 33]. These data prove the concept that subviral particle can be a practical strategy of novel vaccine development. Another well studied subviral partcile platform is the bacteriaphage Qβ VLPs that have been used to develop vaccines to control smoking addiction, hypertention and allergy. Nicotine was cross-linked to Qβ VLPs, forming nicotine-Qβ chimeric particle vaccine. Both phase I and II human trials of smokers showed high nicotine-specific immune responses in vaccinated subjects and revealed significantly increased abstinence rates of smoking [34, 35]. The Qβ VLP was also used to display the epitopes of angiotensin II (Ang-Qβ) and the chimeric vaccine induced high level of angiotensin II-specific IgG and reduced systolic blood pressure in vaccinated rats [36]. A phase I human trial confirmed the high immunogenicity and safety of the chimeric vaccine [36]. In a separate study, an epitope of allergen Der p1 was covalently coupled to the Qβ VLPs (Der-P1-Qβ). This vaccine induced high immune response and has been shown to be safe in humans [37]. There are many other chimeric subviral particle-based vaccines that are in the preclinical evaluation, including those derived from VLPs of polyomaviruses, cowpea mosaic viruses, flock house virus, and NoVs (Table 2). The P particle of NoV that is formed by 24 copies or 12 dimers of the protruding (P) domain of NoV capsid protein (VP1) is highly stable and immunogenic [38•, 39]. Three surface loops are identified on each of the P monomer that tolerate a heterologous insertion of at least 159 residues [9•, 40]. Two chimeric P particles, each with the rotavirus surface spike protein VP8* [9] and the conserved M2e epitope of influenza A viruses [41], have been successfully constructed. Both chimeric vaccines revealed strong humoral and cellular immune responses, neutralization and protective efficacies against these viruses in mouse models [9•, 38•, 41], supporting the two chimeric particles as dual vaccines against rotavirus and NoV, and influenza virus and NoV, respectively.

Challenges and future directions

The non-replicating subunit vaccine is an important option against many viral pathogens, particularly those that an in vitro cultivation system remains lacking such as human NoV, and that are too dangerous to culture, such as variola virus and Ebola virus. It is also a choice for future vaccines to avoid the safety concerns of conventional live attenuated or inactivated vaccines, such as a safe vaccine for eradication of poliovirus. The recent reports on the increased risk of intussusception of the two live attenuated rotavirus vaccines to vaccinated children [42•, 43, 44] is a new example of such concerns that could be prevented by a non-replicating subunit vaccine. However, based on current technology, it seems not possible to produce subviral particles of all known viral pathogens. Thus, the technology of subviral particle-based antigen presentation provides an important strategy for vaccine development against those viral pathogens. As shown in the two tables, many subviral particles are capable antigen carriers. Since the major antigenic determinants of many viral pathogens are known (Table 2), it would be straightforward for design and producing a new vaccine by taking advantage of this technology. The past experience suggests that success of a chimeric vaccine may rely on certain levels of structural and/or chemical compatibility between the carriers and the inserted antigens. There is no simple solution to this technical challenge. If such a problem occurs, attempts of other carrier-antigen combinations are encouraged. In addition, a modification of the carrier vectors by including short flexible peptide adaptors to the two arms of the surface loops is an option. Furthermore, the maximal size of an inserted antigen may vary among different carriers, and therefore, selection of proper carriers for larger antigens is also recommended. Finally, selection of appropriate carrier–antigen combinations should be considered based on the target pathogens and host populations. For example, both NoVs and rotaviruses cause acute gastroenteritis in children, the selection of NoV P particle as carrier to present the rotavirus surface antigens is an ideal combination for a highly effective dual vaccine against the two most important causes of acute gastroenteritis in children. Subviral particle-based vaccines may not be as immunogenic as those replicating viruses following a natural infection. Thus, development of strategies for a maximal efficacy of the subviral vaccines is important, for which optimization of the vaccine formulations and vaccination regimes may be the key, including increase of vaccine doses and dosages, identification of the best administration routes, and use of appropriate adjuvants. In the case that the antigen-presentation approach is used, rational designs of the vaccines by increasing the copy numbers of the inserted antigens/epitopes on each subviral particle carrier should be considered. In addition, insertion of a universal immunue stimulate elements, such as the T cell epitope, may be considered. Currently, production of most subviral particles relies on a eukaryotic expression system, such as baculovirus/insect cells, yeasts or mammalian cells. Since bacteria can produce subviral particles at lower cost, attempt to improve the prokaryotic expression system for production of more subviral particles would help to reduce the cost of vaccine delivery in the developing countries. It is worth to point out that several smaller or simpler subviral particles, including the VLP of HBV (HBcAg) [22], the P particles of NoV [4, 6], the E2 particles of HEV [3, 8], and the small VLP [7] and the L1 capsomeres [45] of HPV, can be readily produced in E. coli with excellent quality and yields. Since all these viral pathogens are prevalent in the developing countries, further study to develop their subviral particles into cost-effective vaccines and vaccine platform for broad application in the developing world is highly significant. Finally, new concept of vaccine delivery, such edible vaccines produced by transgenic vegetbles containing related subviral particles should be explored.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as: • of special interest •• of outstanding interest
  130 in total

1.  Structure, stability and dynamics of norovirus P domain derived protein complexes studied by native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jessica Z Bereszczak; Ioana M Barbu; Ming Tan; Ming Xia; Xi Jiang; Esther van Duijn; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  A statewide assessment of the role of Norwalk virus in outbreaks of food-borne gastroenteritis.

Authors:  J N Kuritsky; M T Osterholm; J A Korlath; K E White; J E Kaplan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Assembly and immunological properties of a bivalent virus-like particle (VLP) for avian influenza and Newcastle disease.

Authors:  Huifang Shen; Chunyi Xue; Lishan Lv; Wei Wang; Qiliang Liu; Kang Liu; Xianxian Chen; Jing Zheng; Xiaoming Li; Yongchang Cao
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  A modified hepatitis B virus core particle containing multiple epitopes of the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein provides a highly immunogenic malaria vaccine in preclinical analyses in rodent and primate hosts.

Authors:  A Birkett; K Lyons; A Schmidt; D Boyd; G A Oliveira; A Siddique; R Nussenzweig; J M Calvo-Calle; E Nardin
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Plant-derived vaccine protects target animals against a viral disease.

Authors:  K Dalsgaard; A Uttenthal; T D Jones; F Xu; A Merryweather; W D Hamilton; J P Langeveld; R S Boshuizen; S Kamstrup; G P Lomonossoff; C Porta; C Vela; J I Casal; R H Meloen; P B Rodgers
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Goose parvovirus structural proteins expressed by recombinant baculoviruses self-assemble into virus-like particles with strong immunogenicity in goose.

Authors:  Huanyu Ju; Na Wei; Qian Wang; Chunyuan Wang; Zhiqiang Jing; Lu Guo; Dapeng Liu; Mingchun Gao; Bo Ma; Junwei Wang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Noroviral P particle: structure, function and applications in virus-host interaction.

Authors:  Ming Tan; Pingan Fang; Teepanis Chachiyo; Ming Xia; Pengwei Huang; Zhaoyin Fang; Wen Jiang; Xi Jiang
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants.

Authors:  Selidji Todagbe Agnandji; Bertrand Lell; José Francisco Fernandes; Béatrice Peggy Abossolo; Barbara Gaelle Nfono Ondo Methogo; Anita Lumeka Kabwende; Ayola Akim Adegnika; Benjamin Mordmüller; Saadou Issifou; Peter Gottfried Kremsner; Jahit Sacarlal; Pedro Aide; Miguel Lanaspa; John J Aponte; Sonia Machevo; Sozinho Acacio; Helder Bulo; Betuel Sigauque; Eusébio Macete; Pedro Alonso; Salim Abdulla; Nahya Salim; Rose Minja; Maxmillian Mpina; Saumu Ahmed; Ali Mohammed Ali; Ali Takadir Mtoro; Ali Said Hamad; Paul Mutani; Marcel Tanner; Halidou Tinto; Umberto D'Alessandro; Hermann Sorgho; Innocent Valea; Biébo Bihoun; Issa Guiraud; Berenger Kaboré; Olivier Sombié; Robert Tinga Guiguemdé; Jean Bosco Ouédraogo; Mary J Hamel; Simon Kariuki; Martina Oneko; Chris Odero; Kephas Otieno; Norbert Awino; Meredith McMorrow; Vincent Muturi-Kioi; Kayla F Laserson; Laurence Slutsker; Walter Otieno; Lucas Otieno; Nekoye Otsyula; Stacey Gondi; Allan Otieno; Victorine Owira; Esther Oguk; George Odongo; Jon Ben Woods; Bernhards Ogutu; Patricia Njuguna; Roma Chilengi; Pauline Akoo; Christine Kerubo; Charity Maingi; Trudie Lang; Ally Olotu; Philip Bejon; Kevin Marsh; Gabriel Mwambingu; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Kwaku Poku Asante; Kingsley Osei-Kwakye; Owusu Boahen; David Dosoo; Isaac Asante; George Adjei; Evans Kwara; Daniel Chandramohan; Brian Greenwood; John Lusingu; Samwel Gesase; Anangisye Malabeja; Omari Abdul; Coline Mahende; Edwin Liheluka; Lincoln Malle; Martha Lemnge; Thor G Theander; Chris Drakeley; Daniel Ansong; Tsiri Agbenyega; Samuel Adjei; Harry Owusu Boateng; Theresa Rettig; John Bawa; Justice Sylverken; David Sambian; Anima Sarfo; Alex Agyekum; Francis Martinson; Irving Hoffman; Tisungane Mvalo; Portia Kamthunzi; Rutendo Nkomo; Tapiwa Tembo; Gerald Tegha; Mercy Tsidya; Jane Kilembe; Chimwemwe Chawinga; W Ripley Ballou; Joe Cohen; Yolanda Guerra; Erik Jongert; Didier Lapierre; Amanda Leach; Marc Lievens; Opokua Ofori-Anyinam; Aurélie Olivier; Johan Vekemans; Terrell Carter; David Kaslow; Didier Leboulleux; Christian Loucq; Afiya Radford; Barbara Savarese; David Schellenberg; Marla Sillman; Preeti Vansadia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Immunogenicity and safety of virus-like particle of the porcine encephalomyocarditis virus in pig.

Authors:  Hye-Young Jeoung; Won-Ha Lee; WooSeog Jeong; Bo-Hye Shin; Hwan-Won Choi; Hee Soo Lee; Dong-Jun An
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.099

10.  Production and immunogenicity of chimeric virus-like particles containing the spike glycoprotein of infectious bronchitis virus.

Authors:  Lishan Lv; Xiaoming Li; Genmei Liu; Ran Li; Qiliang Liu; Huifang Shen; Wei Wang; Chunyi Xue; Yongchang Cao
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.672

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from successful human vaccines: Delineating key epitopes by dissecting the capsid proteins.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Lu Xin; Shaowei Li; Mujin Fang; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Qinjian Zhao
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Branched-linear and agglomerate protein polymers as vaccine platforms.

Authors:  Leyi Wang; Ming Xia; Pengwei Huang; Hao Fang; Dianjun Cao; Xiang-Jin Meng; Monica McNeal; Xi Jiang; Ming Tan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Bioengineered Norovirus S60 Nanoparticles as a Multifunctional Vaccine Platform.

Authors:  Ming Xia; Pengwei Huang; Chen Sun; Ling Han; Frank S Vago; Kunpeng Li; Weiming Zhong; Wen Jiang; John S Klassen; Xi Jiang; Ming Tan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 4.  Adjuvant formulations for virus-like particle (VLP) based vaccines.

Authors:  Velasco Cimica; Jose M Galarza
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Nanovaccine Confers Dual Protection Against Influenza A Virus And Porcine Circovirus Type 2.

Authors:  Peiyang Ding; Qianyue Jin; Xinxin Chen; Suzhen Yang; Junqing Guo; Guangxu Xing; Ruiguang Deng; Aiping Wang; Gaiping Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-09-16

6.  Precisely Molded Nanoparticle Displaying DENV-E Proteins Induces Robust Serotype-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Responses.

Authors:  Stefan W Metz; Shaomin Tian; Gabriel Hoekstra; Xianwen Yi; Michelle Stone; Katie Horvath; Michael J Miley; Joseph DeSimone; Chris J Luft; Aravinda M de Silva
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-10-20

7.  Fusion to a homo-oligomeric scaffold allows cryo-EM analysis of a small protein.

Authors:  Francesca Coscia; Leandro F Estrozi; Fabienne Hans; Hélène Malet; Marjolaine Noirclerc-Savoye; Guy Schoehn; Carlo Petosa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Establishment of a yeast-based VLP platform for antigen presentation.

Authors:  David Wetzel; Theresa Rolf; Manfred Suckow; Andreas Kranz; Andreas Barbian; Jo-Anne Chan; Joachim Leitsch; Michael Weniger; Volker Jenzelewski; Betty Kouskousis; Catherine Palmer; James G Beeson; Gerhard Schembecker; Juliane Merz; Michael Piontek
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Development of a Modular Vaccine Platform for Multimeric Antigen Display Using an Orthobunyavirus Model.

Authors:  Andrea Aebischer; Kerstin Wernike; Patricia König; Kati Franzke; Paul J Wichgers Schreur; Jeroen Kortekaas; Marika Vitikainen; Marilyn Wiebe; Markku Saloheimo; Ronen Tchelet; Jean-Christophe Audonnet; Martin Beer
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-15

10.  Construction and immunological characterization of CD40L or GM-CSF incorporated Hantaan virus like particle.

Authors:  Qikang Ying; Tiejun Ma; Linfeng Cheng; Xiaoxiao Zhang; Agnieszka D Truax; Ruixue Ma; Ziyu Liu; Yingfeng Lei; Liang Zhang; Wei Ye; Fanglin Zhang; Zhikai Xu; Lei Shang; Rongrong Liu; Fang Wang; Xingan Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.