Matteo Moroni1, Donato Zocchi2, Deborah Bolognesi3, Amy Abernethy4, Roberto Rondelli5, Giandomenico Savorani2, Marcello Salera2, Filippo G Dall'Olio6, Giulia Galli6, Guido Biasco7. 1. "MariaTeresa Chiantore Seràgnoli" Hospice Foundation, Bologna, Italy Academy of Sciences of Palliative Medicine, Bologna, Italy. 2. Regional Health System, Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy. 3. "Isabella Seràgnoli" Foundation, Bologna, Italy. 4. Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Pediatric Oncology and Haematology Unit "Lalla Seràgnoli", University of Bologna, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. 6. "Giorgio Prodi" Center for Cancer Research, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 7. Academy of Sciences of Palliative Medicine, Bologna, Italy "Giorgio Prodi" Center for Cancer Research, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy guido.biasco@unibo.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Using the 'surprise' question 'Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?' may improve physicians' prognostic accuracy and identify people appropriate for palliative care. AIM: Determine the prognostic accuracy of general practitioners asking the 'surprise' question about their patients with advanced (stage IV) cancer. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Between December 2011 and February 2012, 42 of 50 randomly selected general practitioners (Bologna area, Italy) prospectively classified 231 patients diagnosed with advanced cancer according to the 'surprise' question and supplied the status of each patient 1 year later. RESULTS: Of the 231 patients, general practitioners responded 'No' to the 'surprise' question for 126 (54.5%) and 'Yes' for 105 (45.5%). After 12 months, 104 (45.0%) patients had died; 87 (83.7%) were in the 'No' group. The sensitivity of the 'surprise' question was 69.3%; the specificity was 83.6%. Positive predictive value was 83.8%; negative predictive value was 69.0%. The answer to the 'surprise' question was significantly correlated with survival at 1 year. Patients in the 'No' group had an odds ratio of 11.55 (95% confidence interval: 5.83-23.28) and a hazard ratio of 6.99 (95% confidence interval: 3.75-13.03) of being dead in the next year compared to patients in the 'Yes' group (p = 0.000 for both odds ratio and hazard ratio). CONCLUSION: When general practitioners used the 'surprise' question for their patients with advanced cancer, the accuracy of survival prognosis was very high. This has clinical potential as a method to identify patients who might benefit from palliative care.
BACKGROUND: Using the 'surprise' question 'Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?' may improve physicians' prognostic accuracy and identify people appropriate for palliative care. AIM: Determine the prognostic accuracy of general practitioners asking the 'surprise' question about their patients with advanced (stage IV) cancer. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Between December 2011 and February 2012, 42 of 50 randomly selected general practitioners (Bologna area, Italy) prospectively classified 231 patients diagnosed with advanced cancer according to the 'surprise' question and supplied the status of each patient 1 year later. RESULTS: Of the 231 patients, general practitioners responded 'No' to the 'surprise' question for 126 (54.5%) and 'Yes' for 105 (45.5%). After 12 months, 104 (45.0%) patients had died; 87 (83.7%) were in the 'No' group. The sensitivity of the 'surprise' question was 69.3%; the specificity was 83.6%. Positive predictive value was 83.8%; negative predictive value was 69.0%. The answer to the 'surprise' question was significantly correlated with survival at 1 year. Patients in the 'No' group had an odds ratio of 11.55 (95% confidence interval: 5.83-23.28) and a hazard ratio of 6.99 (95% confidence interval: 3.75-13.03) of being dead in the next year compared to patients in the 'Yes' group (p = 0.000 for both odds ratio and hazard ratio). CONCLUSION: When general practitioners used the 'surprise' question for their patients with advanced cancer, the accuracy of survival prognosis was very high. This has clinical potential as a method to identify patients who might benefit from palliative care.
Authors: Andrei D Javier; Rocio Figueroa; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Jennifer Morse; Thomas G Stewart; Rakesh Malhotra; Manisha Jhamb; Jane O Schell; Cesar Y Cardona; Cathy A Maxwell; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Yael Schenker; Seo Young Park; Kwonho Jeong; Jennifer Pruskowski; Dio Kavalieratos; Judith Resick; Amy Abernethy; Jean S Kutner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kathryn Elizabeth Hudson; Steven Paul Wolf; Gregory P Samsa; Arif H Kamal; Amy Pickar Abernethy; Thomas William LeBlanc Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Joshua R Lakin; Margaret G Robinson; Rachelle E Bernacki; Brian W Powers; Susan D Block; Rebecca Cunningham; Ziad Obermeyer Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873