Literature DB >> 24662228

Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.

Rodrigo R Aspe1, Paul A Swinton.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity and kinetics during the back squat and overhead squat performed at 3 relative intensities (60, 75, and 90% 3 repetition maximum). Fourteen subjects (age, 26 ± 7 years; height, 182.5 ± 13.5 cm; body mass, 90.5 ± 17.5 kg) performed each exercise using a within-subjects crossover design. In addition, a selection of trunk isolation exercises were included to provide additional comparisons. Squats were performed on a force platform with electromyographic activity of the anterior deltoid, rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, and lateral gastrocnemius recorded throughout. The overhead squat demonstrated significantly greater (p ≤ 0.05) activity in the anterior trunk muscles (RA and EO) during the eccentric phase. However, the magnitudes of the differences were relatively small (approximately 2-7%). In contrast, the back squat displayed significantly greater (p ≤ 0.05) activity in the posterior aspect of the trunk ES and all lower-body muscles during the concentric phase. Kinetic comparisons revealed that significantly greater peak force (p ≤ 0.05) was developed during the back squat. Electromyographic comparisons between the trunk isolation exercises and squat variations demonstrated substantially greater anterior trunk activity during the isolation exercises, whereas the highest activity in the posterior aspect of the trunk was obtained during the squats (p ≤ 0.05). The results of the study do not support the hypothesis that the overhead squat provides a substantially greater stimulus for developing the trunk musculature compared with the back squat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662228     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  11 in total

1.  Muscle Activity Pattern with A Shifted Center of Pressure during the Squat Exercise.

Authors:  Tetsuro Kitamura; Akira Kido; Yukako Ishida; Yasuyo Kobayashi; Shinji Tsukamoto; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Gluteus Maximus Activation during Common Strength and Hypertrophy Exercises: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Walter Krause Neto; Enrico Gori Soares; Thais Lima Vieira; Rodolfo Aguiar; Thiago Andrade Chola; Vinicius de Lima Sampaio; Eliane Florencio Gama
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Effects of load on good morning kinematics and EMG activity.

Authors:  Andrew David Vigotsky; Erin Nicole Harper; David Russell Ryan; Bret Contreras
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Interpreting Signal Amplitudes in Surface Electromyography Studies in Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gregory J Lehman; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Kinematic and Electromyographic Activity Changes during Back Squat with Submaximal and Maximal Loading.

Authors:  Hasan U Yavuz; Deniz Erdag
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Comparison of isokinetic trunk flexion and extension torques and powers between athletes and nonathletes.

Authors:  Amira Ben Moussa Zouita; Fatma Zohra Ben Salah; Catherine Dziri; Chris Beardsley
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat.

Authors:  Michal Murawa; Anna Fryzowicz; Jaroslaw Kabacinski; Jakub Jurga; Joanna Gorwa; Manuela Galli; Matteo Zago
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Muscle Activation Differs between Three Different Knee Joint-Angle Positions during a Maximal Isometric Back Squat Exercise.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Marchetti; Josinaldo Jarbas da Silva; Brad Jon Schoenfeld; Priscyla Silva Monteiro Nardi; Silvio Luis Pecoraro; Julia Maria D'Andréa Greve; Erin Hartigan
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2016-07-18

9.  Lumbar lordosis angle and trunk and lower-limb electromyographic activity comparison in hip neutral position and external rotation during back squats.

Authors:  Tomoki Oshikawa; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Koji Kaneoka
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-03-02

10.  Contemporary perspectives of core stability training for dynamic athletic performance: a survey of athletes, coaches, sports science and sports medicine practitioners.

Authors:  David R Clark; Michael I Lambert; Angus M Hunter
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2018-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.