Literature DB >> 24662155

The effects of high intensity short rest resistance exercise on muscle damage markers in men and women.

Kristen R Heavens1, Tunde K Szivak, David R Hooper, Courtenay Dunn-Lewis, Brett A Comstock, Shawn D Flanagan, David P Looney, Brian R Kupchak, Carl M Maresh, Jeff S Volek, William J Kraemer.   

Abstract

Within and between sexes, universal load prescription (as assigned in extreme conditioning programs) creates extreme ranges in individual training intensities. Exercise intensity has been proposed to be the main factor determining the degree of muscle damage. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine markers of muscle damage in resistance-trained men (n = 9) and women (n = 9) from a high intensity (HI) short rest (SR) (HI/SR) resistance exercise protocol. The HI/SR consisted of a descending pyramid scheme starting at 10 repetitions, decreasing 1 repetition per set for the back squat, bench press, and deadlift, as fast as possible. Blood was drawn pre-exercise (pre), immediately postexercise (IP), 15 minutes postexercise (+15), 60 minutes postexercise (+60), and 24 hours postexercise (+24). Women demonstrated significant increases in interleukin 6 (IL-6; IP), creatine kinase (CK; +24), myoglobin (IP, +15, +60), and a greater relative increase when compared with men (+15, +60). Men demonstrated significant increases in myoglobin (IP, +15, +60, +24), IL-6 (IP, +15), CK (IP, +60, +24), and testosterone (IP, +15). There were significant sex interactions observed in CK (IP, +60, +24) and testosterone (IP, +15, +60, +24). Women completed the protocol faster (women: 34:04 ± 9:40 minutes, men: 39:22 ± 14:43 minutes), and at a slightly higher intensity (women: 70.1 ± 3.5%, men 68.8 ± 3.1%); however, men performed significantly more work (men: 14384.6 ± 1854.5 kg, women: 8774.7 ± 1612.7 kg). Overall, women demonstrated a faster inflammatory response with increased acute damage, whereas men demonstrated a greater prolonged damage response. Therefore, strength and conditioning professionals need to be aware of the level of stress imposed on individuals when creating such volitional high intensity metabolic type workouts and allow for adequate progression and recovery from such workouts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662155     DOI: 10.1097/JSC.0000000000000236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  18 in total

1.  CrossFit® Training Strategies from the Perspective of Concurrent Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Petr Schlegel
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effect of Large Versus Small Range of Motion in the Various Intensities of Eccentric Exercise-Induced Muscle Pain and Strength.

Authors:  Chakravarthy M Sadacharan; Sumin Seo
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  Acute effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on myokines and markers of muscle damage.

Authors:  P Wahl; M Hein; S Achtzehn; W Bloch; J Mester
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 4.  Resistance Training and Stroke: A Critical Analysis of Different Training Programs.

Authors:  Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi; Hélio José Coelho-Junior; Paulo Adriano Schwingel; Fabiano de Jesus Furtado Almeida; Tânia Maria Gaspar Novais; Paula de Lourdes Lauande Oliveira; Bismarck Ascar Sauaia; Cristiane Dominice Melo; Marco Carlos Uchida; Bruno Rodrigues
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-20

5.  Ingestion of an Amino Acid Electrolyte Beverage during Resistance Exercise Does Not Impact Fluid Shifts into Muscle or Performance.

Authors:  JohnEric W Smith; Ben M Krings; Timothy J Peterson; Jaden A Rountree; Roksana B Zak; Matthew J McAllister
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-10

Review 6.  Are extreme conditioning programmes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity functional training methods research paradigms and findings.

Authors:  Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-11-02

7.  Gender Differences in Chronic Hormonal and Immunological Responses to CrossFit®.

Authors:  Rodrigo Poderoso; Maria Cirilo-Sousa; Adenilson Júnior; Jefferson Novaes; Jeferson Vianna; Marcelo Dias; Luis Leitão; Victor Reis; Nacipe Neto; José Vilaça-Alves
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Two Consecutive Days of Crossfit Training Affects Pro and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines and Osteoprotegerin without Impairments in Muscle Power.

Authors:  Ramires A Tibana; Leonardo M de Almeida; Nuno M Frade de Sousa; Dahan da Cunha Nascimento; Ivo V de Sousa Neto; Jeeser A de Almeida; Vinicius C de Souza; Maria de Fátima T P L Lopes; Otávio de Tolêdo Nobrega; Denis C L Vieira; James W Navalta; Jonato Prestes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Immunometabolic Responses after Short and Moderate Rest Intervals to Strength Exercise with and without Similar Total Volume.

Authors:  Ricardo R Agostinete; Fabrício E Rossi; Alan José B Magalhaes; Ana Paula R Rocha; Sérgio S Parmezzani; Jose Gerosa-Neto; Jason M Cholewa; Fabio S Lira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Acute Inflammatory Response to Low-, Moderate-, and High-Load Resistance Exercise in Women With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Benjamin Singh; Sandi Hayes; Jonathan M Peake; Daniel A Galvão; Dennis R Taaffe; Nigel Spry; Kazunori Nosaka; Bruce Cornish; Kathryn H Schmitz; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.