Literature DB >> 24661892

Clinical and anatomic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.

Jeanwan Kang1, Mark F Conrad1, Virendra I Patel1, Shankha Mukhopadhyay1, Ashu Garg1, Matthew R Cambria1, Glenn M LaMuraglia1, Richard P Cambria2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine 30-day and long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a contemporary series and to identify variables associated with stroke and death after CEA.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing an isolated CEA at a single institution between January 1989 and December 2005. Primary study end points were 30-day and long-term overall stroke, ipsilateral stroke, and death. Secondary end points were recurrent stenosis (>70% stenosis) and reintervention. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to create survival curves for the long-term study end points. Multivariate models were created to identify variables associated with the study end points.
RESULTS: During the study period, 3014 CEAs were performed on 2644 patients (mean age, 71.0 ± 8.9 years; 60.9% male; 33.5% symptomatic; 37% primary closure), with mean follow-up of 7.0 years. The 30-day ipsilateral stroke, death, and combined ipsilateral stroke/death rates were 1.3%, 1.1%, and 2.2%, respectively. Previous ipsilateral CEA or neck dissection for cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 3.68; P = .0081) and symptomatic disease (HR, 2.45; P = .0071) were predictive of 30-day ipsilateral stroke. Stroke-free survival was 93.8% at 4 years and 86.9% at 10 years. Diabetes (HR, 1.94; P < .0001), symptomatic disease (HR, 1.75; P < .0001), female gender (HR, 1.34; P = .035), and increasing age (HR, 1.02; P < .0001) were predictors of long-term overall stroke. Ipsilateral stroke-free survival was 97.6% at 5 years and 94.6% at 10 years, respectively. Contralateral occlusion (HR, 2.06; P = .025) and symptomatic disease (HR, 1.87; P = .003) were predictors of ipsilateral stroke, whereas antilipid therapy was protective (HR, 0.65; P = .049). Overall survival was 70.1% at 5 years and 42.2% at 10 years, with no difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Although a variety of comorbidities were associated with inferior late survival, as anticipated, female gender (HR, 0.89; P = .016) and lipid-lowering therapy (HR, 0.69; P < .0001) were protective. Reintervention was 3.4% at 5 years and 6.6% at 10 years, with primary closure (vs patch angioplasty/eversion) increasing the risk of reintervention (HR, 1.72; P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: CEA has favorable perioperative and long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes with respect to its goal of stroke prevention for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Adjuvant medical therapy (antilipid) has increased overall and ipsilateral stroke-free survival.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661892     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

1.  Characterization of Restenosis following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Vessel Wall MR Imaging.

Authors:  W Yang; B A Wasserman; H Yang; L Liu; G Orman; J Intrapiromkul; H H Trout; Y Qiao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Contralateral occlusion increases the risk of neurological complications associated with carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Laura Capoccia; Enrico Sbarigia; Anna Rita Rizzo; Chiara Pranteda; Danilo Menna; Pasqualino Sirignano; Wassim Mansour; Andrea Esposito; Francesco Speziale
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2015-01-29

3.  Hypothermia during Carotid Endarterectomy: A Safety Study.

Authors:  Serena Candela; Raffaele Dito; Barbara Casolla; Emanuele Silvestri; Giuliano Sette; Federico Filippi; Maurizio Taurino; Domitilla Brancadoro; Francesco Orzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of coexisting multivessel coronary artery disease on short-term outcomes and long-term survival of patients treated with carotid stenting.

Authors:  Josef Veselka; Miloslav Špaček; Martin Horváth; Cyril Štěchovský; Ingrid Homolová; Petra Zimolová; Petr Hájek
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Improvement in Cerebral and Ocular Hemodynamics Early after Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients of Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis with or without Contralateral Carotid Occlusion.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Weici Wang; Bi Jin; Yanrong Zhang; Ping Xu; Feixiang Xiang; Yi Zheng; Juan Chen; Shi Sheng; Chenxi Ouyang; Yiqing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.

Authors:  Natalie Domenick Sridharan; Rabih A Chaer; Partha D Thirumala; Jeffrey Balzer; Becky Long; Edith Tzeng; Michel S Makaroun; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.466

7.  Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch.

Authors:  W T Hillman Terzian; Samuel Schadt; Sharvil U Sheth
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

8.  Effect of severe contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion on early and late outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Min-Jae Jeong; Hyunwook Kwon; Min-Ju Kim; Youngjin Han; Tae-Won Kwon; Yong-Pil Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.859

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.