Literature DB >> 24661855

Timing of complications and length of stay after rectal cancer surgery.

Marianne Huebner1, Martin Hübner2, Robert R Cima3, David W Larson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways have been shown to improve short-term outcomes after colorectal surgery. Occurrence of complications can lead to prolonged length of stay (LOS). The goal of this study was to examine whether shorter time to occurrence of complications was associated with a shorter hospital LOS in rectal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery, taking into account the perioperative pathway. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing rectal cancer resection from 2005 to 2011 at a single institution. Enhanced recovery pathway was introduced in 2009. Complications and date of occurrence were reviewed. The impact of perioperative care modalities and comorbidities was evaluated using competing risk models with occurrence of complications and LOS as time-dependent outcomes measured as time from surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 346 patients were included in the analysis with 78 patients treated with enhanced recovery pathway, and 268 with established care. The overall complication rate was 22.3% (77 patients with ileus, wound infection, leak, abscess, small bowel obstruction, reoperation for bleeding, and renal failure). Median time to occurrence of a complication was 3 days post operation. The time to complication diagnosis was associated with shorter time to discharge after the advent of the complication (hazard ratio = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; p = 0.01). Enhanced recovery pathway was associated with a shorter LOS for patients without complications compared with the established pathway (hazard ratio = 2.81; 95% CI, 2.09-3.78; p < 0.001) after adjusting for comorbidities in a competing risk model.
CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of postoperative complications is associated with a shorter LOS after rectal cancer surgery. Enhanced recovery pathway can facilitate a faster recovery in the presence of comorbidities.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661855     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  13 in total

1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver.

Authors:  Jae Keun Kim; Joon Seong Park; Dai Hoon Han; Gi Hong Choi; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Dong Sup Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Multiple postoperative complications: Making sense of the trajectories.

Authors:  Shara I Feld; Sarah E Tevis; Alexander G Cobian; Mark W Craven; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Risk factors affecting hospital stay among patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miren Orive; Urko Aguirre; Nerea Gonzalez; Santiago Lázaro; Maximino Redondo; Marisa Bare; Rocío Anula; Eduardo Briones; Antonio Escobar; Cristina Sarasqueta; Susana Garcia-Gutierrez; José M Quintana
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Assessment of Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samer A Naffouje; Muhammed A Ali; Sivesh K Kamarajah; Bradley White; George I Salti; Fadi Dahdaleh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Taslim Aboudou; Meixuan Li; Zeliang Zhang; Zhengfeng Wang; Yanfei Li; Lufang Feng; Xiajing Chu; Nan Chen; Wence Zhou; Kehu Yang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Early Acute Kidney Injury Within an Established Enhanced Recovery Pathway: Uncommon and Transitory.

Authors:  Fabian Grass; Jenna K Lovely; Jacopo Crippa; Kellie L Mathis; Martin Hübner; David W Larson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Wireless Monitoring Program of Patient-Centered Outcomes and Recovery Before and After Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Virginia Sun; Sinziana Dumitra; Nora Ruel; Byrne Lee; Laleh Melstrom; Kurt Melstrom; Yanghee Woo; Stephen Sentovich; Gagandeep Singh; Yuman Fong
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Charles R Horres; Mohamed A Adam; Zhifei Sun; Julie K Thacker; Richard E Moon; Timothy E Miller; Stuart A Grant
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-09-21

9.  Ordering a Normal Diet at the End of Surgery-Justified or Overhasty?

Authors:  Fabian Grass; Martin Hübner; Jenna K Lovely; Jacopo Crippa; Kellie L Mathis; David W Larson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  The impact of complications on a programme of enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Giovanni D Tebala; Antonio Gallucci; Abdul Q Khan
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.