Kathleen M Hanna1, Nathan W Stupiansky2, Michael T Weaver3, James E Slaven4, Timothy E Stump4. 1. Science of Nursing Care Department, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: kathanna@iupui.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Adolescent Section, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 3. Science of Nursing Care Department, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore alcohol involvement trajectories and associated factors during the year post-high school (HS) graduation among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Youth (N = 181) self-reported alcohol use at baseline and every 3 months for 1 year post-HS graduation. Data were also collected on parent-youth conflict, diabetes self-efficacy, major life events, living and educational situations, diabetes management, marijuana use, cigarette smoking, and glycemic control. Trajectories of alcohol use were modeled using latent class growth analysis. Associations between trajectory class and specific salient variables were examined using analysis of variance, chi square, or generalized linear mixed model, as appropriate. RESULTS: Identified alcohol involvement trajectory classes were labeled as (1) consistent involvement group (n = 25, 13.8%) with stable, high use relative to other groups over the 12 months; (2) growing involvement group (n = 55, 30.4%) with increasing use throughout the 12 months; and (3) minimal involvement group (n = 101, 55.8%) with essentially no involvement until the ninth month. Those with minimal involvement had the best diabetes management and better diabetes self-efficacy than those with consistent involvement. In comparison with those minimally involved, those with growing involvement were more likely to live independently of parents; those consistently involved had more major life events; and both the growing and consistent involvement groups were more likely to have tried marijuana and cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of emerging adults with type 1 diabetes has three unique patterns of alcohol use during the first year after HS.
OBJECTIVE: To explore alcohol involvement trajectories and associated factors during the year post-high school (HS) graduation among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Youth (N = 181) self-reported alcohol use at baseline and every 3 months for 1 year post-HS graduation. Data were also collected on parent-youth conflict, diabetes self-efficacy, major life events, living and educational situations, diabetes management, marijuana use, cigarette smoking, and glycemic control. Trajectories of alcohol use were modeled using latent class growth analysis. Associations between trajectory class and specific salient variables were examined using analysis of variance, chi square, or generalized linear mixed model, as appropriate. RESULTS: Identified alcohol involvement trajectory classes were labeled as (1) consistent involvement group (n = 25, 13.8%) with stable, high use relative to other groups over the 12 months; (2) growing involvement group (n = 55, 30.4%) with increasing use throughout the 12 months; and (3) minimal involvement group (n = 101, 55.8%) with essentially no involvement until the ninth month. Those with minimal involvement had the best diabetes management and better diabetes self-efficacy than those with consistent involvement. In comparison with those minimally involved, those with growing involvement were more likely to live independently of parents; those consistently involved had more major life events; and both the growing and consistent involvement groups were more likely to have tried marijuana and cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of emerging adults with type 1 diabetes has three unique patterns of alcohol use during the first year after HS.
Authors: Janet Silverstein; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Kenneth Copeland; Leslie Plotnick; Francine Kaufman; Lori Laffel; Larry Deeb; Margaret Grey; Barbara Anderson; Lea Ann Holzmeister; Nathaniel Clark Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: R E Glasgow; E B Fisher; B J Anderson; A LaGreca; D Marrero; S B Johnson; R R Rubin; D J Cox Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Stefan Schneider; Ronald J Iannotti; Tonja R Nansel; Denise L Haynie; Bruce Simons-Morton; Douglas O Sobel; Linda Zeitzoff; Loretta Clark; Leslie P Plotnick Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sandra A Brown; Matthew McGue; Jennifer Maggs; John Schulenberg; Ralph Hingson; Scott Swartzwelder; Christopher Martin; Tammy Chung; Susan F Tapert; Kenneth Sher; Ken C Winters; Cherry Lowman; Stacia Murphy Journal: Alcohol Res Health Date: 2009
Authors: Kathleen M Hanna; Michael T Weaver; Timothy E Stump; J Dennis Fortenberry; Linda A DiMeglio Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Deborah Young-Hyman; Mary de Groot; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Korey Hood; Mark Peyrot Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jane L Chiang; David M Maahs; Katharine C Garvey; Korey K Hood; Lori M Laffel; Stuart A Weinzimer; Joseph I Wolfsdorf; Desmond Schatz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 19.112