Literature DB >> 24661682

Concomitant tricuspid valve surgery during implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons database analysis.

Jason O Robertson1, Maria V Grau-Sepulveda2, Shoichi Okada1, Sean M O'Brien2, J Matthew Brennan2, Ashish S Shah3, Akinobu Itoh1, Ralph J Damiano1, Sunil Prasad1, Scott C Silvestry4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performing concomitant tricuspid valve procedures (TVPs) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients with significant pre-operative tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is controversial, and no studies have been large enough to definitively guide therapy.
METHODS: Between January 2006 and September 2012, 2,196 patients with moderate to severe pre-operative TR from 115 institutions underwent implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as reported by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Of these, 588 (27%) underwent a concomitant TVP. Inverse probability weighting based on propensity score was used to adjust for differences between the LVAD alone and LVAD+TVP groups, and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Most patients in the LVAD+TVP group underwent an annuloplasty alone (81.1%). Concomitant TVP did not affect risk of post-operative right VAD insertion (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.36; p = 0.4310) or death (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68-1.33; p = 0.7658). However, TVP was associated with an increased risk for post-operative renal failure (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08; p = 0.0061), dialysis (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15; p = 0.0339), reoperation (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.45; p = 0.0056), greater total transfusion requirement (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p = 0.0013), and hospital length of stay > 21 days (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16-1.43; p < 0.0001). Time on the ventilator and intensive care unit length of stay were also significantly prolonged for the LVAD+TVP group.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing a concomitant TVP for continuous-flow LVAD patients with moderate to severe TR did not reduce early death or right VAD requirement and was associated with worse early post-operative outcomes. These data caution against routine concomitant TVP based solely on degree of pre-operative TR and suggest that additional selection criteria are needed to identify those patients in whom concomitant TVP may prevent post-operative right ventricular failure.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Left ventricular assist device; tricuspid; tricuspid regurgitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661682     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.01.861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  15 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Predictors and management of right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Nadia Fida; Matthias Loebe; Jerry D Estep; Ashrith Guha
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Impact of tricuspid valve surgery at the time of left ventricular assist device insertion on postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Salil V Deo; Soon J Park
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  Current practice in patient selecting for long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  M S Halbreiner; E Soltesz; R Starling; N Moazami
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

5.  Limited Utility of Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Howard K Song; Jill M Gelow; James Mudd; Christopher Chien; Frederick A Tibayan; Kathryn Hollifield; David Naftel; James Kirklin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Durability and Efficacy of Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Yaron D Barac; Alina Nicoara; Muath Bishawi; Jacob N Schroder; Mani A Daneshmand; Nazish K Hashmi; Eric Velazquez; Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Carmelo A Milano
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 12.035

7.  Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Michael S Kiernan; E Wilson Grandin; Marshall Brinkley; Navin K Kapur; Duc Thinh Pham; Robin Ruthazer; J Eduardo Rame; Pavan Atluri; Edo Y Birati; Guilherme H Oliveira; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; David Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 8.  Mechanical Circulatory Support and the Role of LVADs in Heart Failure Therapy.

Authors:  Allison McLarty
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 9.  Minimally-invasive LVAD Implantation: State of the Art.

Authors:  Jasmin S Hanke; Sebastian V Rojas; Murat Avsar; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015

10.  Left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure: results of the first LVAD destination program in the Netherlands : Towards LVAD destination therapy in the Netherlands?

Authors:  O C Manintveld
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.