Literature DB >> 24661494

Fixational saccades alter the gap effect.

Masayuki Watanabe1, Yuka Matsuo, Ling Zha, Michael R MacAskill, Yasushi Kobayashi.   

Abstract

The reaction times of saccadic eye movements have been studied extensively as a probe for cognitive behavior controlled by large-scale cortical and subcortical neural networks. Recent studies have shown that the reaction times of targeting saccades toward peripheral visual stimuli are prolonged by fixational saccades, the largest miniature eye movements including microsaccades. We have shown previously that the frequency of fixational saccades is decreased by volitional action preparation controlled internally during the antisaccade paradigm (look away from a stimulus). Instead, here we examined whether fixational saccade modulation induced externally by sensory events could also account for targeting saccade facilitation by the same sensory events. When targeting saccades were facilitated by prior fixation stimulus disappearance (gap effect), fixational saccade occurrence was reduced, which could theoretically facilitate targeting saccades. However, such reduction was followed immediately by the rebound of fixational saccade occurrence in some subjects, which could eliminate potential benefits from the previous fixational saccade reduction. These results do not mean that fixational saccades were unrelated to the gap effect because they indeed altered that effect by delaying targeting saccade initiation on trials without the fixation gap more strongly than trials with it. Such changes might be attributed to the disruption of volitional saccade preparation because the frequency of fixational saccades observed in this study was associated with the ability of volitional control over antisaccade behavior. These results suggest that fixational saccades alter the gap effect on targeting saccade reaction times, presumably by disrupting volitional saccade commands.
© 2014 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; cognitive; executive functions; eye movements; human; saccade

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661494     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  6 in total

1.  Action and perception are temporally coupled by a common mechanism that leads to a timing misperception.

Authors:  Elena Pretegiani; Corina Astefanoaei; Pierre M Daye; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Dorina-Emilia Creanga; Alessandra Rufa; Lance M Optican
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Time compression of visual perception around microsaccades.

Authors:  Gongchen Yu; Mingpo Yang; Peng Yu; Michael Christopher Dorris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Gap Effect Abnormalities during a Visually Guided Pro-Saccade Task in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Yuka Matsuo; Masayuki Watanabe; Masako Taniike; Ikuko Mohri; Syoji Kobashi; Masaya Tachibana; Yasushi Kobayashi; Yuri Kitamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Neuronal control of fixation and fixational eye movements.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Laurent Goffart; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sensory Input Modulates Microsaccades during Heading Perception.

Authors:  Milena Raffi; Aurelio Trofè; Monica Perazzolo; Andrea Meoni; Alessandro Piras
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Frontal Eye Field Inactivation Reduces Saccade Preparation in the Superior Colliculus but Does Not Alter How Preparatory Activity Relates to Saccades of a Given Latency.

Authors:  Suryadeep Dash; Tyler R Peel; Stephen G Lomber; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-04-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.