Literature DB >> 24661347

Revisiting a non-significant findings study: a parent mentor intervention trial as exemplar.

Susan Sullivan-Bolyai1, Carol Bova2, Lesley Lowes3, Sue Channon3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe an interactive process for revising a parent social support intervention study with non-significant quantitative findings but strong clinical significance. We will present the methodological challenges that were problematic in the original intervention that potentially contributed to the non-significant findings, and a revised plan of action for conducting a future parent social support intervention. Of note, we have reconsidered the theory used to frame the original study, the randomization process, the intervention clarity and fidelity plan, what measures would better capture the effect, and the development of a more robust analysis plan that considers intra-family correlation, mediation and moderation (mixed model analysis). We will present the revision for each of these methods supported by recent empirical literature. Although this process may not be appropriate for all non-significant interventions, it should be considered with any study that has clinical significance.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-significant findings; Parent social support; Theory-driven interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661347      PMCID: PMC4127375          DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  37 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes: how effective are they?

Authors:  S E Hampson; T C Skinner; J Hart; L Storey; H Gage; D Foxcroft; A Kimber; S Cradock; E A McEvilly
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Treatment fidelity in behavior change research: a case example.

Authors:  Barbara Resnick; Pia Inguito; Denise Orwig; Janet Yu Yahiro; William Hawkes; Michele Werner; Sheryl Zimmerman; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  On the merits of attention-control groups.

Authors:  Deborah Gross
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Strategies for maintaining integrity of a behavioral intervention.

Authors:  Kyra Whitmer; Carole Sweeney; Anne Slivjak; Connie Sumner; Andrea Barsevick
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  Optimizing the intervention in research studies.

Authors:  A J Clark
Journal:  Adv Pract Nurs Q       Date:  1996

6.  Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  C R Brewin; C Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-29

7.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

8.  Data and safety monitoring during randomized controlled trials of nursing interventions.

Authors:  Nancy T Artinian; Erika Sivarajan Froelicher; Jillon S Vander Wal
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Self-efficacy in adolescent girls and boys with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  H Y Grossman; S Brink; S T Hauser
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Maternal fear of hypoglycemia in their children with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  W L Clarke; A Gonder-Frederick; A L Snyder; D J Cox
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.634

View more
  1 in total

1.  Parents' information and support needs when their child is diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  David Rankin; Jeni Harden; Norman Waugh; Kathryn Noyes; Katharine D Barnard; Julia Lawton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.