Literature DB >> 24659910

Utilization trends and positive biopsy rates for prostate biopsies in the United States: 2005 to 2011.

Deepak A Kapoor1, David G Bostwick2, Savvas E Mendrinos1, Ann E Anderson1, Carl A Olsson1.   

Abstract

This article assesses the positive biopsy rate and core sampling pattern in patients undergoing needle biopsy of the prostate in the United States at a national reference laboratory (NRL) and anatomic pathology laboratories integrated into urology group practices, and analyzes the relationship between positive biopsy rates and the number of specimen vials per biopsy. For the years 2005 to 2011 we collected pathology data from an NRL, including number of urologists and urology practices referring samples, total specimen vials submitted for prostate biopsies, and final pathologic diagnosis for each case. The diagnoses were categorized as benign, malignant, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or atypical small acinar proliferation. Over the same period, similar data were gathered from urology practices with in-house laboratories performing global pathology services (urology practice laboratories; UPLs) as identified by a survey of members of the Large Urology Group Practice Association. For each year studied, positive biopsy rate and number of specimen vials per biopsy were calculated in aggregate and separately for each site of service. From 2005 to 2011, 437,937 biopsies were submitted in > 4.23 million vials (9.4 specimen vials/biopsy); overall positive biopsy rate was 40.3%-this was identical at both the NRL and UPL (P = .97). Nationally, the number of specimen vials per biopsy increased sharply from a mean of 8.8 during 2005 to 2008 to a mean of 10.3 from 2009 to 2011 (difference, 1.5 specimen vials/biopsy; P = .03). For the most recent 3-year period (2009-2011), the difference of 0.6 specimen vials per biopsy between the NRL (10.0) and UPL (10.6) was not significant (P = 0.08). Positive biopsy rate correlated strongly (P < .01) with number of specimen vials per biopsy. The positive prostate biopsy rate is 40.3% and is identical across sites of service. Although there was a national trend toward increased specimen vials per biopsy from 2005 to 2011, from 2009 to 2011 there was no significant difference in specimen vials per biopsy across sites of service. Increased cancer detection rate correlated significantly with increased number of specimens examined. Segregation of prostate biopsy cores into 10 to 12 unique specimen vials has been widely adopted by urologists across sites of service.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National reference laboratory; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Urology practice laboratories; Utilization trends

Year:  2013        PMID: 24659910      PMCID: PMC3922318     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  22 in total

1.  Individual prostate biopsy core embedding facilitates maximal tissue representation.

Authors:  Jerry Kao; Melissa Upton; Ping Zhang; Seymour Rosen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Adhering to the standard of care for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Deepak A Kapoor; David Penson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Managed competition, integrated delivery systems and antitrust.

Authors:  T L Greaney
Journal:  Cornell Law Rev       Date:  1994-09

4.  CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology.

Authors:  Assaad El-Hakim; Sabri Moussa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Physician referral--the AMA view.

Authors:  J S Todd; J K Horan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Turf wars in radiology: updated evidence on the relationship between self-referral and the overutilization of imaging.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection.

Authors:  Mark H Kawachi; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Barry; J Erik Busby; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; William J Catalona; Michael S Cookson; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Veda N Giri; George P Hemstreet; Richard J Howe; Paul H Lange; Hans Lilja; Kevin R Loughlin; James Mohler; Judd Moul; Robert B Nadler; Stephen G Patterson; Joseph C Presti; Antoinette M Stroup; Robert Wake; John T Wei
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Physician self referral arrangements: legitimate business or unethical "entrepreneurialism".

Authors:  T N McDowell
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1989

9.  The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers.

Authors:  G S Cooper; Z Yuan; K C Stange; L K Dennis; S B Amini; A A Rimm
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Urologists' self-referral for pathology of biopsy specimens linked to increased use and lower prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Jean M Mitchell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  2 in total

1.  The obama administration: driving provider consolidation and increased costs.

Authors:  John McManus
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

2.  A Modest Proposal: Prostate Biopsies and In-house Pathology Laboratories.

Authors:  David F Penson
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.