Literature DB >> 24659828

Single and Multiple Ability Estimation in the SEM Framework: A Non-Informative Bayesian Estimation Approach.

Su-Young Kim1, Youngsuk Suh2, Jee-Seon Kim3, Mark A Albanese4, Michelle M Langer4.   

Abstract

Latent variable models with many categorical items and multiple latent constructs result in many dimensions of numerical integration, and the traditional frequentist estimation approach, such as maximum likelihood (ML), tends to fail due to model complexity. In such cases, Bayesian estimation with diffuse priors can be used as a viable alternative to ML estimation. The present study compares the performance of Bayesian estimation to ML estimation in estimating single or multiple ability factors across two types of measurement models in the structural equation modeling framework: a multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model and a multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) model. A Monte Carlo simulation study demonstrates that Bayesian estimation with diffuse priors, under various conditions, produces quite comparable results to ML estimation in the single- and multi-level MIRT and MIMIC models. Additionally, an empirical example utilizing the Multistate Bar Examination is provided to compare the practical utility of the MIRT and MIMIC models. Structural relationships among the ability factors, covariates, and a binary outcome variable are investigated through the single- and multi-level measurement models. The paper concludes with a summary of the relative advantages of Bayesian estimation over ML estimation in MIRT and MIMIC models and suggests strategies for implementing these methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; MIMIC model; bar examination; multidimensional IRT model; structural equation modeling

Year:  2013        PMID: 24659828      PMCID: PMC3959725          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2013.802647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  1 in total

1.  Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory.

Authors:  Bengt Muthén; Tihomir Asparouhov
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-09
  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of Bayesian to maximum likelihood estimation for latent growth models in the presence of a binary outcome.

Authors:  Su-Young Kim; David Huh; Zhengyang Zhou; Eun-Young Mun
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2020-01-10

2.  The Importance of Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations Using an Interactive Shiny App.

Authors:  Sarah Depaoli; Sonja D Winter; Marieke Visser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14).

Authors:  Makoto Kyougoku; Mutsumi Teraoka; Noriko Masuda; Mariko Ooura; Yasushi Abe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences.

Authors:  Piotr Tarka
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2017-01-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.