Literature DB >> 24659327

Acquisition of spatial knowledge in different urban areas: evidence from a survey analysis of adolescents.

Ģirts Burgmanis, Zaiga Krišjāne, Jurģis Šķilters.   

Abstract

We herein explore the perception of the geographic environment and analyse the mechanisms that constrain the cognitive processing of spatial information in general. Our guiding theoretical background assumption is that the structure of the spatial environment is a cognitively robust and mutually constrained threefold system relating (1) cognitive topology (comprised of a path and place structure of spatial information and constrained by reference frame-based factors), (2) experience-based functional knowledge (including the effects of socio-economic factors, frequency and familiarity) and (3) linguistic representations (primarily encoded in the prepositional system of a natural language). Here, we focus on (2), i.e. the effect of functional knowledge on the process of acquiring spatial knowledge. We empirically tested adolescents aged 12–17 years to explore the interaction between frequency, familiarity and functional knowledge from a developmental point of view. The social factors we explore are precisely defined and parameterized in our results (exposure to a particular urban area, place of residence, gender, age and factors relating to the environmental and social quality of the local area). Our research shows that there are divergences between the so called objective topology and the cognitive typology of the urban environment that are significantly constrained by intensity of interactions with environment, number of functionally significant places within particular area and age from a developmental perspective in terms of spatial knowledge acquisition.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24659327     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-014-0607-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  8 in total

Review 1.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments.

Authors:  A W Siegel; S H White
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1975

2.  Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout.

Authors:  David Waller; Jack M Loomis; Sibylle D Steck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

3.  Learning your way around town: how virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information.

Authors:  Ehren L Newman; Jeremy B Caplan; Matthew P Kirschen; Igor O Korolev; Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-08-01

4.  Spatial language, visual attention, and perceptual simulation.

Authors:  Kenny R Coventry; Dermot Lynott; Angelo Cangelosi; Lynn Monrouxe; Dan Joyce; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  City rats: insight from rat spatial behavior into human cognition in urban environments.

Authors:  Osnat Yaski; Juval Portugali; David Eilam
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation.

Authors:  R F Wang; E S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-12-15

7.  Human spatial representation: insights from animals.

Authors:  Ranxiao Wang; Elizabeth Spelke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Social influences on spatial memory.

Authors:  Keith B Maddox; David N Rapp; Sebastien Brion; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.