Literature DB >> 24659191

Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology.

Daniel Gill1, Oliver G B Garrod, Rachael E Jack, Philippe G Schyns.   

Abstract

Animals use social camouflage as a tool of deceit to increase the likelihood of survival and reproduction. We tested whether humans can also strategically deploy transient facial movements to camouflage the default social traits conveyed by the phenotypic morphology of their faces. We used the responses of 12 observers to create models of the dynamic facial signals of dominance, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. We applied these dynamic models to facial morphologies differing on perceived dominance, trustworthiness, and attractiveness to create a set of dynamic faces; new observers rated each dynamic face according to the three social traits. We found that specific facial movements camouflage the social appearance of a face by modulating the features of phenotypic morphology. A comparison of these facial expressions with those similarly derived for facial emotions showed that social-trait expressions, rather than being simple one-to-one overgeneralizations of emotional expressions, are a distinct set of signals composed of movements from different emotions. Our generative face models represent novel psychophysical laws for social sciences; these laws predict the perception of social traits on the basis of dynamic face identities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face perception; facial expressions; social cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24659191     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614522274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  8 in total

1.  Neural evidence for cultural differences in the valuation of positive facial expressions.

Authors:  BoKyung Park; Jeanne L Tsai; Louise Chim; Elizabeth Blevins; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Judgments of social awkwardness from brief exposure to children with and without high-functioning autism.

Authors:  Ruth B Grossman
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2014-06-12

3.  Independence of face identity and expression processing: exploring the role of motion.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Natalie Butcher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-13

4.  Trust in AI Agent: A Systematic Review of Facial Anthropomorphic Trustworthiness for Social Robot Design.

Authors:  Yao Song; Yan Luximon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Facial expressions elicit multiplexed perceptions of emotion categories and dimensions.

Authors:  Meng Liu; Yaocong Duan; Robin A A Ince; Chaona Chen; Oliver G B Garrod; Philippe G Schyns; Rachael E Jack
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Super-Memorizers Are Not Super-Recognizers.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Sebastien Miellet; Anna M Dzieciol; Boris Nikolai Konrad; Martin Dresler; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Motivational Salience of Faces Is Related to Both Their Valence and Dominance.

Authors:  Hongyi Wang; Amanda C Hahn; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pervasive influence of idiosyncratic associative biases during facial emotion recognition.

Authors:  Marwa El Zein; Valentin Wyart; Julie Grèzes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.