Literature DB >> 24658903

Sonication of antibiotic spacers predicts failure during two-stage revision for prosthetic knee and hip infections.

Charles L Nelson, Robert B Jones, Nathaniel C Wingert, Michael Foltzer, Thomas R Bowen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection is a leading cause of failure after two-stage reimplantation. One cause of relapse may be persistent subclinical infection. Difficulty exists in detecting biofilm-forming infections. Sonication disrupts biofilm and has led to higher rates of positive intraoperative cultures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our aims in this study were to determine (1) if sonication results were predictive of failure, including reinfection, at 2-year followup; and (2) whether sonication of antibiotic spacers at the time of reimplantation improves sensitivity of intraoperative cultures.
METHODS: We prospectively followed 36 consecutive patients undergoing two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic hip or knee infection. Minimum followup was 19 months (mean, 29.9 months; range, 19–38 months). Results of intraoperative cultures and sonicated antibiotic spacers were analyzed.
RESULTS: Positive sonication results were predictive of failure as defined by reinfection at 2-year followup. Among the 18 patients who had positive sonication results, reinfection developed in nine patients (50%) compared with two of 18 patients (11%) with negative sonication results (odds ratio, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.2–69.0). Sonication of antibiotic spacers improved the sensitivity of intraoperative cultures from 45% to 82%. [corrected].
CONCLUSIONS: Sonication of antibiotic spacers appears to be useful in predicting failure attributable to recurrent infection after two-stage reimplantation. For patients with positive sonication cultures during reimplantation, more aggressive antimicrobial treatment may be indicated after reimplantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24658903      PMCID: PMC4048437          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3571-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

Review 1.  An AOA critical issue: aging of the North American population: new challenges for orthopaedics.

Authors:  Joseph A Buckwalter; James D Heckman; David P Petrie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J A Rand; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Benjamin Zmistowski; Elie F Berbari; Thomas W Bauer; Bryan D Springer; Craig J Della Valle; Kevin L Garvin; Michael A Mont; Montri D Wongworawat; Charalampos G Zalavras
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Persistence of bacteria on antibiotic loaded acrylic depots. A reason for caution.

Authors:  R W Kendall; C P Duncan; J A Smith; J H Ngui-Yen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Bacterial growth on antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. A prospective in vivo retrieval study.

Authors:  R W Kendall; C P Duncan; C P Beauchamp
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Results of periprosthetic hip and knee infections caused by resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Douglas J Kilgus; David J Howe; Andrew Strang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Hirakawa; B N Stulberg; A H Wilde; T W Bauer; M Secic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award.

Authors:  T K Fehring; S Odum; T F Calton; J B Mason
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Total hip replacement.

Authors: 
Journal:  NIH Consens Statement       Date:  1994 Sep 12-14
View more
  34 in total

1.  Two-stage revision of prosthetic hip joint infections using antibiotic-loaded cement spacers: When is the best time to perform the second stage?

Authors:  Ines Vielgut; Patrick Sadoghi; Matthias Wolf; Lukas Holzer; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Schwantzer; Rudolf Poolman; Bernhard Frankl; Mathias Glehr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  New Innovations in the Treatment of PJI and Biofilms-Clinical and Preclinical Topics.

Authors:  Mariam Taha; Hesham Abdelbary; F Patrick Ross; Alberto V Carli
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  CORR Insights®: What Markers Best Guide the Timing of Reimplantation in Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for PJI? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul J Duwelius
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Augmentation with antibiotic-impregnated spacers in sepsis revision surgery].

Authors:  I Flesch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Are Sonication Cultures of Antibiotic Cement Spacers Useful During Second-stage Reimplantation Surgery for Prosthetic Joint Infection?

Authors:  Adam S Olsen; Alan Wilson; Michael J OʼMalley; Kenneth L Urish; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  What Markers Best Guide the Timing of Reimplantation in Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for PJI? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Navin Fernando; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Hyun Jung Kim; Hamed Vahedi; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Sonication Culture of Antimicrobial Agent-Containing Cement Spacers Removed during Staged Revisions for Arthroplasty Infection.

Authors:  Eric Gomez-Urena; Rafael J Sierra; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quiantance; Melissa J Karau; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Two stage revision hip arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection. Comparison study: with or without the use of a spacer.

Authors:  Dariusz Marczak; Marek Synder; Marcin Sibiński; Michał Polguj; Julian Dudka; Jacek Kowalczewski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Diagnosis of spacer-associated infection using quantitative cultures from sonicated antibiotics-loaded spacers: implications for the clinical outcome.

Authors:  J Esteban; I Gadea; C Pérez-Jorge; E Sandoval; J García-Cañete; R Fernandez-Roblas; A Blanco; L Prieto-Borja; J Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Sonication fluid culture of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer has high accuracy to confirm eradication of infection before reimplantation of new prostheses.

Authors:  Qingyu Zhang; Baocong Ding; Jinglin Wu; Jun Dong; Fanxiao Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.