Literature DB >> 24658820

The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale.

Andrea Gallamini1, Sally F Barrington2, Alberto Biggi3, Stephane Chauvie4, Lale Kostakoglu5, Michele Gregianin6, Michel Meignan7, George N Mikhaeel8, Annika Loft9, Jan M Zaucha10, John F Seymour11, Michael S Hofman12, Luigi Rigacci13, Alessandro Pulsoni14, Morton Coleman15, Eldad J Dann16, Livio Trentin17, Olivier Casasnovas18, Chiara Rusconi19, Pauline Brice20, Silvia Bolis21, Simonetta Viviani22, Flavia Salvi23, Stefano Luminari24, Martin Hutchings25.   

Abstract

A retrospective, international, multicenter study was undertaken to assess: (i) the prognostic role of 'interim' positron emission tomography performed during treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma; and (ii) the reproducibility of the Deauville five-point scale for the interpretation of interim positron emission tomography scan. Two hundred and sixty patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled. Fifty-three patients with early unfavorable and 207 with advanced-stage disease were treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine ± involved-field or consolidation radiotherapy. Positron emission tomography scan was performed at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment was not changed according to the results of the interim scan. An international panel of six expert reviewers independently reported the scans using the Deauville five-point scale, blinded to treatment outcome. Forty-five scans were scored as positive (17.3%) and 215 (82.7%) as negative. After a median follow up of 37.0 (2-110) months, 252 patients are alive and eight have died. The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 83% for the whole study population, 28% for patients with interim positive scans and 95% for patients with interim negative scans (P<0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of interim positron emission tomography scans for predicting treatment outcome were 0.73, 0.94, 0.94 and 0.73, respectively. Binary concordance amongst reviewers was good (Cohen's kappa 0.69-0.84). In conclusion, the prognostic role and validity of the Deauville five-point scale for interpretation of interim positron emission tomography scans have been confirmed by the present study. Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24658820      PMCID: PMC4040916          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.103218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  27 in total

1.  FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Martin Hutchings; Annika Loft; Mads Hansen; Lars Møller Pedersen; Thora Buhl; Jesper Jurlander; Simon Buus; Susanne Keiding; Francesco D'Amore; Anne-Marie Boesen; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Lena Specht
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.

Authors:  Lalitha K Shankar; John M Hoffman; Steve Bacharach; Michael M Graham; Joel Karp; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Steven Larson; David A Mankoff; Barry A Siegel; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease: Cotswolds meeting.

Authors:  T A Lister; D Crowther; S B Sutcliffe; E Glatstein; G P Canellos; R C Young; S A Rosenberg; C A Coltman; M Tubiana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome.

Authors:  Corinne Haioun; Emmanuel Itti; Alain Rahmouni; Pauline Brice; Jean-Didier Rain; Karim Belhadj; Philippe Gaulard; Laurent Garderet; Eric Lepage; Felix Reyes; Michel Meignan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

6.  Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  M Hutchings; N G Mikhaeel; P A Fields; T Nunan; A R Timothy
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin's disease patients.

Authors:  P L Zinzani; M Tani; S Fanti; L Alinari; G Musuraca; E Marchi; V Stefoni; P Castellucci; M Fina; M Farshad; S Pileri; M Baccarani
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Luigi Rigacci; Francesco Merli; Luca Nassi; Alberto Bosi; Isabella Capodanno; Stefano Luminari; Umberto Vitolo; Rosaria Sancetta; Emilio Iannitto; Livio Trentin; Caterina Stelitano; Silvia Tavera; Alberto Biggi; Antonio Castagnoli; Annibale Versari; Michele Gregianin; Ettore Pelosi; Pierfederico Torchio; Alessandro Levis
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Josée M Zijlstra; Gerda Lindauer-van der Werf; Otto S Hoekstra; Lotty Hooft; Ingrid I Riphagen; Peter C Huijgens
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease.

Authors:  D Hasenclever; V Diehl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  60 in total

1.  Qualitative interpretation of PET scans using a Likert scale to assess neck node response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Ulrika Bitzén; Elisabeth Kjellén; Per Nilsson; Peter Wahlberg; Eva Brun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Baseline and ongoing PET-derived factors predict detrimental effect or potential utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) performed for surveillance in asymptomatic lymphoma patients in first remission.

Authors:  Silvia Morbelli; Selene Capitanio; Fabrizio De Carli; Francesca Bongioanni; Enrico De Astis; Maurizio Miglino; Maria Teresa Verardi; Ambra Buschiazzo; Francesco Fiz; Cecilia Marini; Elena Pomposelli; Gianmario Sambuceti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  The evolving role of response-adapted PET imaging in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Michael Coyle; Lale Kostakoglu; Andrew M Evens
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  FDG PET/CT imaging as a biomarker in lymphoma.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Emmanuel Itti; Andrea Gallamini; Anas Younes
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Imaging in Lymphoma: The Key Role of Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Martin Hutchings; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-07-14

7.  Advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: End-of-treatment FDG-PET should be maintained.

Authors:  Elif Hindié; Charles Mesguich; Krimo Bouabdallah; Noël Milpied
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  How can we better predict treatment outcomes in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Authors:  Claudio Agostinelli
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  A risk stratification model for nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas based on the NCCN-IPI and posttreatment Deauville score.

Authors:  Ho-Young Yhim; Yong Park; Yeon-Hee Han; Sungeun Kim; Sae-Ryung Kang; Joon-Ho Moon; Ju Hye Jeong; Ho-Jin Shin; Keunyoung Kim; Yoon Seok Choi; Kunho Kim; Min Kyoung Kim; Eunjung Kong; Dae Sik Kim; Jae Seon Eo; Ji Hyun Lee; Do-Young Kang; Won Sik Lee; Seok Mo Lee; Young Rok Do; Jun Soo Ham; Seok Jin Kim; Won Seog Kim; Joon Young Choi; Deok-Hwan Yang; Jae-Yong Kwak
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  How I treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Thomas S Uldrick; Richard F Little
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.