Literature DB >> 24658692

Repeated upper endoscopy in the Medicare population: a retrospective analysis.

Heiko Pohl, Douglas Robertson, H Gilbert Welch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is done often for various indications. Little is known about the frequency of repeated EGD and the diagnoses that drive it.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of repeated EGD in the Medicare population and determine diagnoses most often associated with it.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Medicare database. PATIENTS: Among a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients who had an index EGD between 2004 and 2006. Diagnoses from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, reported for the index endoscopy were divided into 3 diagnostic groups on the basis of whether the index diagnosis suggested that repeated EGD was expected, uncertain, or not expected. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients with repeated EGD within 3 years of an index EGD.
RESULTS: Approximately 12% of Medicare beneficiaries had an EGD between 2004 and 2006 (n = 108 785). Of these, 33% (n = 36 331) had at least 1 repeated EGD within 3 years. Of all patients with initial EGDs, 10% (n = 11 370) had an associated diagnosis suggesting a need for follow-up examination, whereas 61% (n = 66 307) did not. Of all patients with repeated examinations, 54% (n = 19 687) came from the group in which repeated EGD was not expected. When new clinical events were excluded, 43% of all patients with repeated EGDs (n = 15 706) did not have a diagnosis at index or repeated EGD that justified a repeated examination. LIMITATION: Whether individual procedures were clinically indicated cannot be verified.
CONCLUSION: One in 3 Medicare beneficiaries who received an EGD had a repeated EGD within 3 years. Nearly one half of repeated examinations were done in patients with diagnoses at index or repeated EGD that did not suggest the need for a repeated examination. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24658692     DOI: 10.7326/M13-0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  Regional Variability of Repeat Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Use in the National Veteran Population.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Garrett Cole; Nan Hu; William K Thompson; John Fang; Matthew Samore
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Oral bisphosphonates and upper gastrointestinal toxicity: a study of cancer and early signals of esophageal injury.

Authors:  N E Morden; J C Munson; J Smith; T A Mackenzie; S K Liu; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Not Too Hot, Not Too Cold, but "Just Right".

Authors:  Brian J Hanson; Aasma Shaukat
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Overuse of Repeat Upper Endoscopy in the Veterans Health Administration: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Joel H Rubenstein; Heiko Pohl; Megan A Adams; Eve Kerr; Robert Holleman; Sandeep Vijan; Jason A Dominitz; John M Inadomi; Dawn Provenzale; Joseph Francis; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Academic I.D. in jeopardy: the erosion of time, professional values, and physician satisfaction.

Authors:  Richard P Wenzel; Michael B Edmond
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Comparison of patient tolerance and acceptability of magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy and flexible endoscopy in the investigation of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Foong Way David Tai; Hey Long Ching; Marion Sloan; Reena Sidhu; Mark McAlindon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 7.  Endoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Rationale, Candidates, and Challenges.

Authors:  Amrit K Kamboj; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  Risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease after a negative screening endoscopy.

Authors:  Mohammad H Shakhatreh; Zhigang Duan; Nathaniel Avila; Aanand D Naik; Jennifer R Kramer; Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey; John Chen; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Gastric intestinal metaplasia is associated with gastric dysplasia but is inversely correlated with esophageal dysplasia.

Authors:  Justin M Gomez; James T Patrie; Wissam Bleibel; Jeanetta W Frye; Bryan G Sauer; Vanessa M Shami; Edward B Stelow; Christopher A Moskaluk; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-02-16

10.  The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic on Access to Endoscopy Procedures in the VA Healthcare System.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Tonya Kaltenbach; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.