| Literature DB >> 24658649 |
Mengmeng Zhao1, Yangwu Ren1, Li Shen1, Yue Zhang1, Baosen Zhou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have reported the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without palate (NSCL/P) in Asian populations. However, findings have been conflicting. In order to investigate the association, a meta-analysis was performed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24658649 PMCID: PMC3962346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow chart explaining the selection of eligible studies included in the meta-analysis.
The characteristics of eligible studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Anthor(year) | Country | Geographical location | Population of cases | Source of control | Subjects | Sample size |
| ||
| Case | Control | 677 | 1298 | ||||||
| Kumari et al. (2013) | India | Western/Central Asia | Cases having family history of any congenital malformation, kidney-related diseases and other severe diseases were excluded. Mean age was 5 years. | Mixed | Children | 467 | 469 | 0.518 | 0.134 |
| Aida et al. (2012) | Turkey | Western/Central Asia | Cases were excluded due to alternative diagnosis of their existing syndromic conditions. Age range not stated. | Mixed | Children | 56 | 76/93 | 0.105/0.779 | 0.187 |
| Mothers | 54 | 76/93 | |||||||
| Wang et al. (2012) | China | Eastern Asia | Not stated. | HB | Mothers | 89 | 64 | 0.070 | |
| Han et al. (2011) | China | Eastern Asia | Cases with recognized congenital anomalies or syndromes were excluded. Mean age was 9.57±0.72 years. | HB | Children | 187 | 213 | 0.236 | 0.545 |
| Guo et al. (2009) | China | Eastern Asia | Cases having family history of any congenital malformation were excluded. Mean age was 9.04 years. | HB | Children | 97 | 104 | 0.277 | |
| Mothers | 97 | 104 | |||||||
| Ali et al. (2009) | India | Western/Central Asia | Syndromic patients as well as families with a syndromic member other than NSCL/P probands were not included. Age range for patients 4 months-24 years, for mothers 19–45 years. | PB | Children | 323 | 214 | 0.916 | 0.395 |
| Mothers | 116 | 214 | |||||||
| Wan et al. (2006) | China | Eastern Asia | Cases having family history of any congenital malformation were excluded. Age range not stated. | HB | Children | 48 | 60 | 0.075 | 0.210 |
| Shotelersuk et al. (2003) | Thailand | Eastern Asia | All syndromic cases were excluded. Age range not stated. | PB | Children | 109 | 202 | 0.478 | 0.876 |
| Mothers | 67 | 202 | |||||||
HWE Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; HB hospital based; PB population based.
two groups of control.
Overall and subgroup results of the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and NSCL/P.
| Study(n) | T vs. C | TT vs. CC | CT vs. CC | CT/TT vs. CC | TT vs. CC/CT | |||||
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| |
|
| ||||||||||
| Children(n = 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.36(1.00–1.86) | 0.052 |
| Mothers(n = 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Children(n = 4) | 1.31(0.95–1.80) | 0.099 |
| 0.009 | 1.68(0.88–3.22) | 0.117 | 1.66(0.89–3.10) | 0.111 | 1.26(0.87–1.83) | 0.217 |
| Mothers(n = 3) | 1.39(0.75–2.54) | 0.293 | 2.19(0.46–10.44) | 0.326 | 1.09(0.72–1.65) | 0.688 | 1.28(0.64–2.59) | 0.487 | 2.06(0.64–6.61) | 0.224 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Children(n = 4) |
|
|
| 0.026 |
|
|
|
| 1.44(0.53–3.95) | 0.477 |
| Mothers(n = 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2Forest plot of association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and NSCL/P risk in children (T vs. C).
Figure 3Forest plot of association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and NSCL/P risk in mothers (T vs. C).
Overall and subgroup results of the association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and NSCL/P.
| Study(n) | T vs. C | TT vs. CC | CT vs. CC | CT/TT vs. CC | TT vs. CC/CT | |||||
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| OR(95%CI) |
| |
|
| ||||||||||
| Children(n = 6) | 1.03(0.79–1.35) | 0.819 | 1.08(0.78–1.48) | 0.652 | 1.01(0.68–1.48) | 0.982 | 1.03(0.71–1.48) | 0.881 | 1.09(0.80–1.48) | 0.578 |
| Mothers(n = 3) | 0.94(0.73–1.20) | 0.593 | 0.78(0.40–1.50) | 0.452 | 0.98(0.71–1.35) | 0.905 | 0.95(0.70–1.30) | 0.751 | 0.79(0.41–1.50) | 0.467 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Children(n = 3) | 1.05(0.61–1.82) | 0.855 | 0.97(0.47–1.99) | 0.930 | 1.16(0.44–3.06) | 0.767 | 1.13(0.49–2.61) | 0.768 | 0.96(0.48–1.93) | 0.907 |
| Mothers(n = 1) | 0.224 | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Children(n = 3) | 1.04(0.73–1.49) | 0.819 | 1.23(0.53–2.85) | 0.626 | 0.94(0.76–1.16) | 0.551 | 0.98 (0.66–1.44) | 0.901 | 1.23(0.60–2.53) | 0.568 |
| Mothers(n = 2) | 0.83(0.62–1.12) | 0.218 | 0.81(0.20–3.27) | 0.767 | 0.81(0.54–1.20) | 0.283 | 0.79(0.54–1.15) | 0.218 | 0.88(0.24–3.17) | 0.839 |
Figure 4Funnel plot analysis to detect publication bias.