Jun-xian Zhou1, Dan Liao1, Shuo Zhang1, Ni Cheng2, Hui-qiong He1, Richard D Ye3. 1. School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. 2. Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. 3. 1] School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China [2] Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The chemerin receptor CMKLR1 is one type of G protein-coupled receptors abundant in monocyte-derived dendritic cells and macrophages, which plays a key role in the entry of a subset of immunodeficiency viruses including HIV/SIV into lymphocytes and macrophages. The aim of this work was to investigate how CMKLR1 was internalized and whether its internalization affected cell signaling in vitro. METHODS: Rat basophilic leukemia RBL-2H3 cells, HEK 293 cells, and HeLa cells were used. CMKLR1 internalization was visualized by confocal microscopy imaging or using a FACScan flow cytometer. Six potential phosphorylation sites (Ser337, Ser343, Thr352, Ser344, Ser347, and Ser350) in CMKLR1 were substituted with alanine using site-directed mutagenesis. Heterologous expression of wild type and mutant CMKLR1 allowed for functional characterization of endocytosis, Ca(2+) flux and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation. RESULTS: Chemerin and the chemerin-derived nonapeptide (C9) induced dose-dependent loss of cell surface CMKLR1-GFP fusion protein and increased its intracellular accumulation in HEK 293 cells and RBL-2H3 cells stably expressing CMKLR1. Up to 90% of CMKLR1 was internalized after treatment with C9 (1 μmol/L). By using different agents, it was demonstrated that clathrin-independent mechanism was involved in CMKLR1 internalization. Mutations in Ser343 for G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation and in Ser347 for PKC phosphorylation abrogated CMKLR1 internalization. Loss of CMKLR1 internalization partially enhanced the receptor signaling, as shown by increased Ca(2+) flux and a shorter latency to peak level of ERK phosphorylation. CONCLUSION: CMKLR1 internalization occurs in a clathrin-independent manner, which negatively regulated the receptor-mediated Ca(2+) flux and ERK phosphorylation.
AIM: The chemerin receptorCMKLR1 is one type of G protein-coupled receptors abundant in monocyte-derived dendritic cells and macrophages, which plays a key role in the entry of a subset of immunodeficiency viruses including HIV/SIV into lymphocytes and macrophages. The aim of this work was to investigate how CMKLR1 was internalized and whether its internalization affected cell signaling in vitro. METHODS:Rat basophilic leukemiaRBL-2H3 cells, HEK 293 cells, and HeLa cells were used. CMKLR1 internalization was visualized by confocal microscopy imaging or using a FACScan flow cytometer. Six potential phosphorylation sites (Ser337, Ser343, Thr352, Ser344, Ser347, and Ser350) in CMKLR1 were substituted with alanine using site-directed mutagenesis. Heterologous expression of wild type and mutant CMKLR1 allowed for functional characterization of endocytosis, Ca(2+) flux and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation. RESULTS:Chemerin and the chemerin-derived nonapeptide (C9) induced dose-dependent loss of cell surface CMKLR1-GFP fusion protein and increased its intracellular accumulation in HEK 293 cells and RBL-2H3 cells stably expressing CMKLR1. Up to 90% of CMKLR1 was internalized after treatment with C9 (1 μmol/L). By using different agents, it was demonstrated that clathrin-independent mechanism was involved in CMKLR1 internalization. Mutations in Ser343 for G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation and in Ser347 for PKC phosphorylation abrogated CMKLR1 internalization. Loss of CMKLR1 internalization partially enhanced the receptor signaling, as shown by increased Ca(2+) flux and a shorter latency to peak level of ERK phosphorylation. CONCLUSION:CMKLR1 internalization occurs in a clathrin-independent manner, which negatively regulated the receptor-mediated Ca(2+) flux and ERK phosphorylation.
Authors: Shirley M L Tse; Wendy Furuya; Elizabeth Gold; Alan D Schreiber; Kirsten Sandvig; Robert D Inman; Sergio Grinstein Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-11-06 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: W Meder; M Wendland; A Busmann; C Kutzleb; N Spodsberg; H John; R Richter; D Schleuder; M Meyer; W G Forssmann Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2003-12-18 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Antonio Rapacciuolo; Shayela Suvarna; Liza Barki-Harrington; Louis M Luttrell; Mei Cong; Robert J Lefkowitz; Howard A Rockman Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-06-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: David J Ferland; Emma S Darios; Richard R Neubig; Benita Sjögren; Nguyen Truong; Rosa Torres; Thomas S Dexheimer; Janice M Thompson; Stephanie W Watts Journal: Vascul Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 5.773