Antonella Minutolo1, Beatrice Conti1, Sandro Grelli2, Carmela Viscomi1, Giancarlo Labbadia3, Clara Balsano4. 1. Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Oncology, Francesco Balsano Foundation, ex A. Cesalpino Foundation, Rome, Italy. 2. U.O.C. Clinical Microbiology, Tor Vergata Hospital, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Clinical and Medical Therapy, "Sapienza" University of Rome - Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy. 4. Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Oncology, Francesco Balsano Foundation, ex A. Cesalpino Foundation, Rome, Italy; Institute of Biology and Molecular Pathology (IBPM) - CNR (National Research Council), Rome, Italy.
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus infection leads to a wide spectrum of liver diseases ranging from mild chronic hepatitis to end-stage cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. An intriguing aspect of the HCV infection is its close connection with lipid metabolism playing an important role in the HCV life cycle and in its pathogenesis. HCV is known to be a hepatotropic virus; however, it can also infect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The goal of the current investigation is to compare the adipogenesis profile of liver tissues to lymphocytes of HCV infected patients, in order to understand if PBMCs may reflect the alterations of intracellular pathways occurring during HCV-related liver steatosis. Using the Human Adipogenesis PCR Array, gene expression was analyzed in liver samples and PBMCs of chronic HCV+, HBV+ and Healthy Donors (HDs) patients. We observed a similar modulation of lipid metabolism in HCV+ and HBV+liver tissues and lymphoid, cells suggesting that PBMCs reflect the liver adipogenesis deregulation related to infection, even if the two viruses have a different impact in the regulation of the adipogenesis mechanisms. In particular, some genes involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation, as well as in cell transformation, were up-regulated, in a similar way, in both HCV models analyzed. Interestingly, these genes were positively correlated to virological and hepatic functional parameters of HCV+ patients. On the contrary, HBV+ patients displayed a completely different profile. PBMCs of HCV+ patients seem to be useful model to study how HCV-related lipid metabolism deregulation occurs in liver. The obtained data suggest some molecules as new possible biomarkers of HCV-related liver damage progression.
Hepatitis C virus infection leads to a wide spectrum of liver diseases ranging from mild chronic hepatitis to end-stage cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. An intriguing aspect of the HCV infection is its close connection with lipid metabolism playing an important role in the HCV life cycle and in its pathogenesis. HCV is known to be a hepatotropic virus; however, it can also infect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The goal of the current investigation is to compare the adipogenesis profile of liver tissues to lymphocytes of HCV infectedpatients, in order to understand if PBMCs may reflect the alterations of intracellular pathways occurring during HCV-related liver steatosis. Using the Human Adipogenesis PCR Array, gene expression was analyzed in liver samples and PBMCs of chronic HCV+, HBV+ and Healthy Donors (HDs) patients. We observed a similar modulation of lipid metabolism in HCV+ and HBV+liver tissues and lymphoid, cells suggesting that PBMCs reflect the liver adipogenesis deregulation related to infection, even if the two viruses have a different impact in the regulation of the adipogenesis mechanisms. In particular, some genes involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation, as well as in cell transformation, were up-regulated, in a similar way, in both HCV models analyzed. Interestingly, these genes were positively correlated to virological and hepatic functional parameters of HCV+ patients. On the contrary, HBV+ patients displayed a completely different profile. PBMCs of HCV+ patients seem to be useful model to study how HCV-related lipid metabolism deregulation occurs in liver. The obtained data suggest some molecules as new possible biomarkers of HCV-related liver damage progression.
The Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects, approximately, 170 million individuals, about 3% of the world's population [1]. The severity grade and the speed of liver damage progression are defined by several cofactors such as age, gender, the host's genetic background, alcohol and drugs consumption, immune status, co-infections and the metabolic status [2], [3]. HCV infects both hepatocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) [4], [5], [6].The HCV infection is characterized by specific clinical abnormalities of lipid metabolism, such as hypo-beta-lipoproteinaemia and liver steatosis [7]. The presence of steatosis and the progression throughout fibrosis are some of the main histological features of HCV infectedpatients [8], [9]. The viral deregulation of lipid metabolism affects liver disease progression and the response to antiviral therapies [10]. The density of circulating HCV particles in the blood of chronically infectedpatients is very heterogeneous. The very low density of some particles has been attributed to an association of the virus with apolipoprotein-beta (apoB) positive and triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TRL) likely, resulting in hybrid lipoproteins, known as lipo-viro-particles (LVP). LVPs contain the viral envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2, capsid and viral HCV-RNA. The specific infectivity of these particles has been shown to be higher than the infectivity of particles of higher density [11], [12]. Moreover, lipids play an important role in HCV life cycle: the viral entry is partly mediated by lipoprotein receptors (LDLR) [13]; the maturation and secretion of viral particles are mediated by the Apolipoprotein A–I [14] and the Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL).Currently, it is clear that HCV affects more than one aspect of the lipoprotein metabolism and the associated liver damage. The HCV-related lipid deregulation causes overexpression of different hepatic enzymes: hormone sensitive Lipase (LIPE), lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and Leptin [15]. Accordingly, patients exhibit serum lipid abnormalities, such as low levels of: LDL [16], [17], Resistin (RETN) [18], Adiponectin (ADIPOQ) [19] and Adipogenin (ADIG) [20]. The genes involved in the lipid de novo synthesis and beta oxidation, such as the nuclear receptor Liver X Receptor alpha (LXR alpha), the Sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 (SREBP1c), the Fatty acid synthase (FASN) and the Acetyl CoA carboxylase Beta (ACACB) respectively, are associated with HCV infection, too [21], as well as Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) that modulates inflammatory and metabolic response that is mainly expressed in adipocytes and macrophages [22].We asked if PBMCs might be the mirror of the adipogenic deregulation occurring in the liver tissue, during HCV infection. Thus, we compared the adipogenesis profile of liver tissues to lymphocytes of HCV infectedpatients.
Experimental Procedures
Patients recruitment and biological samples collection
This research is born as a descriptive and observational study aimed to characterize adipogenesis profile in HCV+, HBV+ patients and healthy donors. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sapienza University, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject at the time of enrollment. “(Rif. 2534/26.07.2012 n. prot.717/12)”. 40 HCV, 20 HBV-infectedpatients and 20 healthy donors (HDs) were enrolled in an open study by the Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, University of Rome “La Sapienza” and UOC Clinical Microbiology, “Tor Vergata” Hospital of Rome. Exclusion criteria for HCV and HBV patients were: 1) previous treatment with antiviral therapy, immunosuppressive drugs, and/or regular use of drugs influencing lipid metabolism and/or oxidative stress; 2) advanced cirrhosis; 3) hepatocellular carcinoma; 4) other causes of liver disease or mixed etiologies; 5) humanimmunodeficiency virus infection; 6) active intravenous drug addiction, 7) alcohol consumption. The current study was performed in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice, the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and its appendices, and local and national laws. Liver and Blood samples were collected at the same time and blood samples were used to isolate PBMCs through a density gradient according to the standard Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia) technique. Separate scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocellular ballooning and to stage fibrosis from 0 to 4 [23]. Biopsies of HCVpatients were classified for grade and stage according to the Scheuer system [24].
Viral Load and Qualitative detection of antibodies to the Hepatitis C virus
HCV RNA viral load (VL) levels were determined using a quantitative ultrasensitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay (Roche Diagnostics).To detect anti-HCV antibodies in human sera (recombinant proteins NS3-NS4 and anti-capsid antibody) was used The Access (Beckman Coulter) HCV Ab PLUS assay immunoenzymatic method (Biorad).
HBV viral load, HBeAg and HBsAg detection
Qualitative HBeAg and Quantitative HBsAg levels were determined by using the Roche Cobas reagent kits (Roche Diagnostics). The HBV DNA viral load (IU/mL) was determined by using Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV Test (Roche Diagnostics).
Cell culture, Constructs and Reagents
The humanhepatoma-derived cell line Huh7.5 were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin and 2 mM L-glutamine (Lonza).J6/JFH1 cDNA (kindly provided by C. Rice, Rockefeller University) was used to generate the HCV cell model. Antibodies anti humanKLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2 (Abcam), Adipsin, Adipogenin, Twist 1, beta Actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), HCV NS5a (Austral Biologicals) were used for immunofluorescence assay. Detection was achieved using horseradish peroxidase–conjugate secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). ECL Plus Western and ECL-Hyperfilm (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) were used. Specific neutral lipids were stained with BODIPY (Invitrogen).
Replication and infection assays
The chimeric J6/JFH1 virus was generated and used according to Lindenbach BD and collegues [25]. Huh7.5 cells were infected (MOI = 0.1) 1 day after seeding. After 3 days cells were harvested and processed for RNA and protein extractions.The lipid accumulation was evaluated through the fluorescent probe BODIPY used as a stain for neutral and non-polar lipids in immunofluorescent assay.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were grown on coverslips and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Primary antibodies were incubated for 1 h at room temperature and visualized by conjugated secondary antibodies (invitrogen). Coverslips were mounted in SlowFade-Anti-Fade (Invitrogen) and examined under a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP2)
Samples for mRNA expression analysis
Frozen liver biopsies tissues RNA were prepared with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Complementary DNA synthesis was generated from 2 μg of total RNA using the reverse transcription kit (Promega).
Human Adipogenesis PCR Array
To investigate a wide spectrum of genes involved in lipid metabolism the Human Adipogenesis RT2 Profiler PCR Array (Qiagen) was used. 84 “metabolic” genes were analyzed in addition to positive control genes (beta actin and Ribosomal protein). Real-time PCR was performed with 7500 Fast Real-Time (Applied Biosystems) using Sybr green detection. Results were analyzed by RT2 Profiler PCR Array Data Analysis. Transcriptional levels of genes were shown as fold change vs Healthy Donors, values >1.50 or <0.5 were considered significantly modified. All dataset was submitted in Geo Repository http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo. Accession number: GSE54432
Western blot analysis
For protein extraction, liver biopsies were homogenized and maintained on ice. Cells were collected and lysed and the proteins extracted were analyzed through SDS–PAGE and probed with different antibodies followed by detection with ECL plus (GE Healthcare).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of data was performed using the SPSS statistical software system (17.0 Windows). The independent samples t-test analysis was performed; for non-parametric correlation, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was calculated by Bonferroni's correction.
Results
Patients' characteristics
For this pilot study, 40 naïve chronic HCV+ (72% genotype 1; 28% genotype 2), 20 HBV+ patients and 20 Healthy Donors (HDs) matched by age and gender, have been consecutively enrolled. Neither infected patients nor HDs were under any treatment at the moment of the enrollment.
,
and
highlight the clinical features of all patients studied. 27.3 % of HCV+ patients had a F2/F3 liver fibrosis, the remaining had F0-F1 liver fibrosis. Regarding the liver state of HBV+ patients, more than 80% had a F0/F1 grade of fibrosis (81,7%), the remaining had F2 status. Moreover 55% HBV population resulted HBeAg positive and 45% HBeAg negative. No steatosis was ecographically detectable in HDpatients.
Table 1
Biochemical data of HCV+ and Healthy Donors (HDs).
HCV (40)
HDs (20)
P1
Sex (F/M)
25/15
9/11
Age (years)
53.7±15.3
48.3±6.0
NS
Body weight (kg)
64.6±11.6
64.7±5
NS
BMI (kg/m2) (≤25)
24.6±4
24.7±0.6
NS
HOMA-IR (<2)
2.6±2.0
1.0±1.2
<0.05
cholesterol (81.1–235.5 mg/dL)
172.3±9.7
185.7±26.2
NS
HDL (34.7–56 mg/dL)
62.4±22.6
56.7±4.2
NS
LDL (54.8–120 mg/dL)
89.9±33.8
101.3±13.4
NS
Triglycerides (45.1–235 mg/dL)
91.7±12.9
90.7±15
NS
Ferritin (30–400 μg/L)
209.6±17
201.0±15.5
NS
AST (9–45 IU/mL)
50.6±14.1
29.7±10.2
<0.05
ALT (10–40 IU/mL)
71.6±9.7
26.3±2.3
<0.05
GGT (8–61 IU/mL)
55.1±4.2
50.1±1.0
NS
AP (40–129 IU/mL)
86.7±8.4
65.3±13.6
<0.05
Total bilirubin (<1.20 mg/dL)
0.7±0.3
0.55±0.1
NS
hsCRP (0.1–0.6 g/L)
1.8±0.3
0.4±0.2
<0.05
VES (0–25 mm/h)
13.8±1.5
10.0±0.5
NS
Glucose (73.9–109.9 mg/dL)
102.6±53.1
88.3±10.1
<0.05
Insulin (2.6–24.90 μU/mL)
9.3±3.8
4±1.6
<0.05
Hyaluronic acid (ng/ml)
106.3±45.3
51,7±18.3
NS
Footnotes: P t-test HCV vs HDs.
Table 2
Biochemical data of HBV+ patients.
HBV pts (20)
P2
Sex (F/M)
12-ago
Age (years)
51,5±6.35
NS
Body weight (kg)
63,5±10.56
NS
Body mass index (kg/m2) (≤25)
24,86±5
NS
HOMA-IR (<2)
1,71±0.36
NS
Total cholesterol (81.1–235.5 mg/dL)
187±0.63
NS
HDL cholesterol (34.7–56 mg/dL)
60±23.55
NS
LDL cholesterol (54.8–120 mg/dL)
115,5±23.6
NS
Triglycerides (45.1–235 mg/dL)
106,6±15.9
NS
Ferritin (30–400 μg/L)
210,45±13
NS
AST (9–45 IU/mL)
46±5.7
HBeAg −
NS
49±3.7
HBeAg +
NS
ALT (10–40 IU/mL)
38±9.7
HBeAg −
NS
78±5.63
HBeAg +
<0.05
GGT (8–61 IU/mL)
53.1±6
NS
AP (40–129 IU/mL)
78,8±7.3
<0.05
Total bilirubin (<1.20 mg/dL)
0,56±0.12
NS
hsCRP (0.1–0.6 g/L)
1,69±0.2
<0.05
VES (0–25 mm/h)
15±1.9
NS
Glucose (73.9–109.9 mg/dL)
90,2±12
NS
Insulin (2.6–24.90 μU/mL)
1,11±2.6
NS
Hyaluronic acid (ng/ml)
86,36
NS
Footnotes: P t-test HBV vs HDs.
Table 3
Virological data of HCV+ and HBV+.
HCV pts
HCV-RNA PCR 106 (UI/mL)
2,11±27
<0.05*
P3
HCV genotype
1a: 42% (19)
1b: 30% (13)
2c: 17% (5)
2a/2c: 11% (3)
HBV pts
Log10 IU/mL
HBV DNA
HBsAg
HBeAg −
4,6±0.36
1,642±0,15
HBeAg +
7,3±0.25
9,459±0,85
<0.05*
<0.05*
P4
Footnotes: P3 HCV vs HDsP4 Anti HBeAg + vs Anti HBeAg -.
Footnotes: P t-test HCV vs HDs.Footnotes: P t-test HBV vs HDs.Footnotes: P3 HCV vs HDsP4 Anti HBeAg + vs Anti HBeAg -.
The adipogenesis of chronic HCV infected patients
First of all, we performed the RT-PCR array to investigate the adipogenesis profile on HCV+ liver biopsies. The liver of HCV+ patients was characterized by a deep deregulation of genes involved in the control of glucose and lipid metabolism (
). Interestingly, we obtained a similar gene expression profile in the HCV+ PBMCs (
). It is intriguing to note the two experimental models have a similar behavior: the larger part of the analyzed genes was modulated in a similar way (
). All the details of adipogenesis profile in chronic HCV+ PBMCs and liver tissues were shown in .
Figure 1
HCV affects lipid metabolism in livers and PBMCs of chronic HCV + patients.
A) Dot Plot Array profile in HCV+ vs HDs liver biopsies and PBMCs (B). Transcriptional levels of genes are shown as fold change (HCV+ vs HDs). Values >1.50 or <0.5 were considered significantly modified. C) Percentage of the total adipogenesis gene transcripts modulated in chronic HCV+ patients (livers and PBMCs). D, E) Significant positive correlation between all genes in HCV+ livers and PBMCs (rho values 0.688 and 0.889 respectively, p<0.005). F) Percentage of functional genes groups UP modulated in HCV+ livers and PBMCs.
HCV affects lipid metabolism in livers and PBMCs of chronic HCV + patients.
A) Dot Plot Array profile in HCV+ vs HDs liver biopsies and PBMCs (B). Transcriptional levels of genes are shown as fold change (HCV+ vs HDs). Values >1.50 or <0.5 were considered significantly modified. C) Percentage of the total adipogenesis gene transcripts modulated in chronic HCV+ patients (livers and PBMCs). D, E) Significant positive correlation between all genes in HCV+ livers and PBMCs (rho values 0.688 and 0.889 respectively, p<0.005). F) Percentage of functional genes groups UP modulated in HCV+ livers and PBMCs.In particular, the analysis of the HCV+ biopsies and PBMCs compared to HDs profile, revealed that 72,6 % of the analyzed genes were modulated in the same manner: 46 (77%) genes were up-regulated, 6 (10%) down-regulated and 8 (13%) were unaffected by the virus. 27,4% of the studied genes were modulated in a different way (
and
).Spearman's rho statistical investigation showed a significant positive correlation (rho = 0.688, p<0.001) among the genes analyzed, in both HCV+ liver biopsies and PBMCs (
).The same statistical evaluation was performed in HDs liver tissues and PBMCs, and gave us similar results (
, rho = 0.889, p<0.001).Moreover, here we want to underline that HCV in vitro model is characterized by a similar transcriptional modulation of some genes (Adig, Adipsin, KLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2, TWIST1) already analyzed in HCV+ liver tissues and PBMCs, supporting the belief that PBMCs might be a good substitute of liver tissues for the investigation of HCV-dependent metabolic derangement (see below).At this point, we considered interesting to focus our attention on HCV+ up-regulated genes, because in the other two groups (down-regulated and no modulated genes) there weren't genes involved in the control of adipogenic pathways. Among the up regulated genes, 41% of them were transcriptional factors involved in glucose and lipid metabolism (9.5% insulin pathway, 9.5% energy metabolism and 22% nuclear receptors) and 59% in cell transformation (4% p53 pathways, 15% Wnt/beta catenin, 9% fibrosis, 8% signal transduction and regulation and 23% inflammation) (
).Moreover we have noticed that the 25% of modulated genes were significantly more expressed in the HCV + patients with elevated liver damage (F2/F3) in comparison to HCV+ F0/F1. ( and , p<0.05).
The deregulation of adipogenesis is specifically due to HCV-infection
Since HCV infection causes a similar deregulation of adipogenesis in liver tissues and PBMCs, we wondered whether such alterations were specifically mediated by HCV. To this purpose, we performed the adipogenesis array in HBV+ Livers and PBMCS (
). Also in this case we have appreciated a similar expression in livers and PBMCs () and a direct significant correlation between gene expression in liver and lymphocytes. Spearman's rho statistical investigation showed a significant positive correlation (** rho = 0.745) among the genes analyzed, in both HBV+ liver biopsies and PBMCs (
). The HBV+ gene expression was greatly different from the profile displayed by HCV+.(
) in fact 80% of genes showed a different expression in the two infection groups. (
). Such data highlight the specificity of the adipogenesis profile of HCV infectedpatients.
Figure 2
HCV and HBV infection adipogenesis profile.
A, B) Dot Plot Array profile in HBV+ livers and PBMCs vs HDs. C) Significant positive correlation between all genes in HBV+ livers and PBMCs (rho values 0.759, p<0.05). D) Percentage of the total adipogenesis gene transcripts modulated in chronic HCV+ vs HBV+ patients' livers and PBMCs. E, F). Histogram plot comparing different number of genes modulation in HCV+ and HBV+ livers and PBMCs.
HCV and HBV infection adipogenesis profile.
A, B) Dot Plot Array profile in HBV+ livers and PBMCs vs HDs. C) Significant positive correlation between all genes in HBV+ livers and PBMCs (rho values 0.759, p<0.05). D) Percentage of the total adipogenesis gene transcripts modulated in chronic HCV+ vs HBV+ patients' livers and PBMCs. E, F). Histogram plot comparing different number of genes modulation in HCV+ and HBV+ livers and PBMCs.
Possible novel biomarkers of HCV-dependent liver damage
Some of the analyzed genes struck our attention because had never been directly associated with HCV infection. All the results, obtained the RT PCR-array approach, were confirmed by the relative mRNAs and protein expression levels (** p<0.001), (
), and highlighted a strong up-regulation of two important transcription factors: Adipogenin (ADIG), Adipsin (CFD), Krüppel-like transcription factors 15 and 13 (KLF15 and KLF3) (
) and TCF7L2 and Twist1 (
).
Figure 3
HCV up-regulates genes involved in lipid metabolism but with addictional role in inflammation, proliferation and transformation.
Real-time analysis (mean values± S.D) of ADIG and Adipsin (A), KLF15 and KLF3 (B), TCF7L2 and TWIST 1 (C) are expressed as fold change, and normalized with an housekeeping gene. Asterisks indicate significant difference between HCV+ vs HDs (*p<0,05; **p<0.001) Adipogenin and Adipsin (D); KLF15 and KLF3 (E); TCF7L2 and TWIST 1 (F) protein levels in HCV+/HDs Liver and PBMCs. One experiment representative of all the independent experiments performed is shown. Beta-actin indicates the equal amount of protein loaded for each sample.
HCV up-regulates genes involved in lipid metabolism but with addictional role in inflammation, proliferation and transformation.
Real-time analysis (mean values± S.D) of ADIG and Adipsin (A), KLF15 and KLF3 (B), TCF7L2 and TWIST 1 (C) are expressed as fold change, and normalized with an housekeeping gene. Asterisks indicate significant difference between HCV+ vs HDs (*p<0,05; **p<0.001) Adipogenin and Adipsin (D); KLF15 and KLF3 (E); TCF7L2 and TWIST 1 (F) protein levels in HCV+/HDs Liver and PBMCs. One experiment representative of all the independent experiments performed is shown. Beta-actin indicates the equal amount of protein loaded for each sample.
Deregulation of metabolic profile in in vitro system model of HCV infection
To confirm that the expression of modulated genes in PBMCs reflected what happens in hepatocytes during HCV infection, we used an HCV in vitro model. 72 hrs post infection we revealed the presence of HCV-protein NS5A (
) and a high intracellular fat accumulation in infected hepatocytes (
).
Figure 4
In in vitro HCV model up-regulates genes involved in lipid metabolism.
Immunofluorescence assay HCV NS5A (red) (A) and lipid accumulation (green) (B). C) Real-time analysis (mean values± S.D) of ADIG, Adipsin, KLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2 and TWIST 1 are expressed as fold change and normalized with a housekeeping gene. Asterisks indicate significant difference between J6/JFH1 HuH7.5 vs HuH7.5 (*p<0,05; **p <0.001). D) protein levels in HCV+/HDs Adipogenin and Adipsin, KLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2, TWIST 1in HuH7.5 and J6/JFH1 HuH7.5. One experiment representative of 5 independent experiments performed is shown. Beta-actin indicates the amount of protein loaded for each sample.
In in vitro HCV model up-regulates genes involved in lipid metabolism.
Immunofluorescence assay HCV NS5A (red) (A) and lipid accumulation (green) (B). C) Real-time analysis (mean values± S.D) of ADIG, Adipsin, KLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2 and TWIST 1 are expressed as fold change and normalized with a housekeeping gene. Asterisks indicate significant difference between J6/JFH1 HuH7.5 vs HuH7.5 (*p<0,05; **p <0.001). D) protein levels in HCV+/HDs Adipogenin and Adipsin, KLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2, TWIST 1in HuH7.5 and J6/JFH1 HuH7.5. One experiment representative of 5 independent experiments performed is shown. Beta-actin indicates the amount of protein loaded for each sample.The HCV in vitro model had a similar modulation of the previously analyzed genes (
, ** p<0.001), supporting the idea that PBMCs may possibly be used as a substitute of liver tissues for metabolic investigation, in HCV+ patients.
HCV up-regulated genes are closely related to virological and biochemical liver damage parameters, as well as to the severity of steatosis and fibrosis
Statistical analysis statistically positively correlated the HCV viremia plasma levels (VL) and antibody titer (AbT) to Adipogenin (ADIG), Adipsin (CFD), KLF15, KLF3, TCF7L2 and Twist1, either in HCV+ PBMCs or in liver tissues (
,*p<0.05). All genes were positively correlated to liver enzymes (ALT and AST) levels, too (*p<0.05) Even more interesting was the positive correlation of all these genes with the severity of liver steatosis and Fibroscan parameters (
).
Table 4
*Correlation between mRNA expression levels and virological, biochemical parameters and steatosis.
HCV+ Liver
HCV+ PBMCs
mRNA
IU/ml
Spearman's Rho
p
Spearman's Rho
p
Adipogenin
VL
0,2458
*0.04
0,1826
*0.046
AbT
0,2534
*0.032
0,3430
*0.03
AST
0,1645
*0.048
0,2598
*0.042
ALT
0,2673
*0.023
0,2736
*0.032
Fibro
4,5263
*0.023
0,5944
*0.031
Adipsin
VL
0,3229
*0.012
0,3909
*0.018
AbT
0,4986
**<0.001
0,6215
**<0.001
AST
0,2743
*0.035
0,3395
*0.026
ALT
0,2902
*0.012
0,2472
*0.028
Fibro
0,5868
**<0.001
0,5152
**<0.001
KLF15
VL
0,2458
*0.025
0,1826
*0.015
AbT
0,2534
*0.04
0,3430
*0.014
AST
0,1645
*0.021
0,2566
*0.023
ALT
0,2673
*0.036
0,2736
*0.032
Fibro
0,6840
**<0.001
0,5479167
**<0.001
KLF15
VL
0,31875
*0.021
0,390
*0.015
AbT
0,3229
*0.032
0,3430
*0.011
AST
0,2340
*0.04
0,2638
*0.014
ALT
0,3319
*0.031
0,3368
*0.016
Fibro
0,4569
**<0.001
0,4826
**<0.001
TCF7L2
VL
0,3805
*0.012
0,3909
*0.014
AbT
0,3229
*0.015
0,3180
*0.023
AST
0,2472
*0.013
0,316
*0.036
ALT
0,4090
*0.014
0,4430
*0.021
Fibro
0,5541
**0.001
0,594
**0.001
TWIST1
VL
0,2701
*0.018
0,2430
*0.04
AbT
0,31666
*0.014
0,270
*0.013
AST
0,3034
*0.016
0,3194
*0.025
ALT
0,2604
*0.045
0,2638
*0.028
Fibro
0,6701
**<0.001
0,5638
**<0.001
*The Spearman's rho was evaluated (84 genes and 22 biochemical data) with a Bonferroni's correction of 0.000472.
*The Spearman's rho was evaluated (84 genes and 22 biochemical data) with a Bonferroni's correction of 0.000472.The deregulated adipogenetic genes of HBV+ patients do not display any correlation with virological parameters (data not shown).
Discussion
Vital processes regulated by the liver including metabolism, lipid homeostasis, cellular proliferation and immune response are known to be systematically deregulated as result of persistent HCV infection [26], [27].Our data suggest that PBMCs reflect liver adipogenesis deregulation during HCV infection. In fact, we observed a similar modulation of HCV-related lipid metabolism either in HCV+ liver tissues or lymphoid cells, highlighting the function of PBMCs as a surrogate tool of HCV steatotic liver tissues. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not only an hepatotropic virus, but it is also able to infect the immune system cells [28], [29], and its replication in liver are strictly related to HCV infection status in PBMCs [30]. Through the Human Adipogenesis RT2 Profiler PCR Array, we analyzed 84 genes involved in adipogenesis mechanism; among these 23 resulted different modulated in liver tissues and PBMCs, emphasizing the genes specificity expression in the two compartments matched. Thus, the main result was that in our HCV+ patients more than the 70% of genes, involved in the control of lipid metabolism, resulted similarly deregulated in HCV+ liver tissues and PBMCs. We confirmed the HCV-related lipid deregulation causing over-expression of: hormone sensitive Lipase (LIPE), lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and Leptin [15], as well as the modulation of genes involved in the lipid de novo synthesis and beta oxidation (LXR alpha, SREBP1c, FASN and ACACB) [21]. The specificity of the HCV-related adipogenic deregulated genes was supported by the fact that the adipogenic profile of HBV+ infected livers and PBMCs was deeply different from what observed in HCV+. Accordingly, the J6/JFH1 in in vitro HCV infection system displayed a similar adipogenesis profile, suggesting that the PBMCs modulation could really mimic what occur in the hepatocytes and was not an artifact due to lymphocyte infiltrating in the liver during HCV infection.Some interesting molecules, involved in the control of lipid metabolism, were over-expressed. Among these, Adipogenin (ADIG) [17] that was not previously reported to be up-regulated in HCV infectedpatients and has an opposite behavior respect to HBV infectedpatients. ADIG is known to be involved not only in the adipogenesis, but also in the onset of inflammation [20].On the other end the up-regulation of the Krüppel-like transcription factors family (KLFs), in HCV infectedpatients, was noteworthy. KLFs are expressed in multiple tissues and regulate the expression of genes involved in glucose uptake and adipogenesis [31], [32]. KLF3 is an important regulator of several biological processes, including adipogenesis, erythropoiesis, and B cell development [33]; while, KLF15 was proposed for the regulation of the HBV gene expression and replication [34]. The role of KLF15 on HBV replication was confirmed by our experimental data. Interestingly, KLF 3 and 15 are not only implicated in adipogenesis, but also in hepatocarcinogenesis modulation [33], [35].Finally, we appreciated the up-regulation of several genes involved in the transformation: Adipsin or complement factor D (CFD), Transcription Factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) and TWIST1. Adipsin is a serine protease secreted by adipocytes into the bloodstream and regulates the activation of the alternative complement pathway [36]. It could be involved in adipogenic transformation of hepatocytes [37]. Interestingly Adipsin was differently regulated in our HCV+ patients respect to HBV+ patients.TCF7L2 has a key role in the Wnt/beta Catenin signaling [38] that is known to have an important function in the induction of HCV-related HCC and represents a critical process for the invasiveness and metastatic development of several humancancers [39]. This gene resulted positively modulated in the adipogenesis profile of HCV+ patients, while was no modulated in HBV+.Lastly, another significant gene resulting positively modulated in the adipogenesis profile during the HCV infection is Twist1, which is able to induce the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) HCV-related neoplastic transformation [40] and tumor progression [41], [42], [43].Of noteworthy, all the molecules reported above to be deregulated, in HCV+ patients, displayed an intriguing positive correlation to virological (VL and AbT) and hepatic (ALT and AST) parameters, as well as to the severity of steatosis and fibrosisIn conclusion, the HCV+ PBMCs are able to reflect the behavior of the adipogenesis pathways of liver tissues. PBMCs might be considered a real valid support to investigate the HCV-related pathogenetic mechanisms of lipid metabolism deregulation, and to explore new therapeutical targets to overcome the HCV-related transformation.Evaluation of gene expression difference between HCVpatients with different grade of fibrosis (group: F0/F1 vs group F2/F3). Real-time analysis (mean values± S.D) of genes are expressed as fold change, and normalized with an housekeeping gene. Asterisks indicate significant difference between F0/F1 vs F2/F3 in HCV+ livers and PBMCs(*p<0,05; **p <0.001).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Microarray analysis of chronic HCV + Liver tand PBMC compared to HDs.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.Microarray analysis of chronic HBV + Livers and PBMCs compared to HDs.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.Differences in gene expression between HCVpatients with different grade of fibrosis. Real-time analysis (mean values± S.D) of genes are expressed as Ct and normalized with an housekeeping gene. Asterisks indicate significant difference between F0/F1 vs F2/F3 in HCV+ livers and PBMCs.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Kenneth J Katschke; Ping Wu; Rajkumar Ganesan; Robert F Kelley; Mary A Mathieu; Philip E Hass; Jeremy Murray; Daniel Kirchhofer; Christian Wiesmann; Menno van Lookeren Campagne Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Anna Albecka; Sandrine Belouzard; Anne Op de Beeck; Véronique Descamps; Lucie Goueslain; Justine Bertrand-Michel; François Tercé; Gilles Duverlie; Yves Rouillé; Jean Dubuisson Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Tram N Q Pham; Dolly M H Lin; Patricia M Mulrooney-Cousins; Norma D Churchill; Arleta Kowala-Piaskowska; Iwona Mozer-Lisewska; Anna Machaj; Monika Pazgan-Simon; Malgorzata Zalewska; Krzysztof Simon; Dawn King; S Bharati Reddy; Tomasz I Michalak Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: Hironori Koga; Orkhontuya Tsedensodnom; Yoshito Tomimaru; Evan J Walker; Han Chu Lee; Kang Mo Kim; Hirohisa Yano; Jack R Wands; Miran Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniela Ploen; Mohamed Lamine Hafirassou; Kiyoshi Himmelsbach; Daniel Sauter; Martin L Biniossek; Thomas S Weiss; Thomas F Baumert; Catherine Schuster; Eberhard Hildt Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 25.083