Tamás Szél1, Charles Antzelevitch2. 1. Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, Utica, New York; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. 2. Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, Utica, New York. Electronic address: ca@mmrl.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that late potentials and fractionated electrogram activity are due to delayed depolarization within the anterior aspects of right ventricular (RV) epicardium in experimental models of Brugada syndrome (BrS). BACKGROUND: Clinical reports have demonstrated late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography (ECG) recorded in patients with BrS. Recent studies report the appearance of late potentials and fractionated activity on bipolar electrograms recorded in the epicardium of the RV outflow tract in patients with BrS. METHODS: Action potential and bipolar electrograms were recorded at epicardial and endocardial sites of coronary-perfused canine RV wedge preparations, together with a pseudo-ECG. The transient outward potassium current agonist NS5806 (5 μM) and the Ca(2+)-channel blocker verapamil (2 μM) were used to pharmacologically mimic the BrS genetic defect. RESULTS: Fractionated electrical activity was observed in RV epicardium, but not in endocardium, as a consequence of heterogeneities in the appearance of the second upstroke of the epicardial action potential, and discrete high-frequency spikes developed as a result of concealed phase 2 re-entry. In no case did we observe primary conduction delay as the cause of the BrS ECG phenotype or of late potential or fractionated electrogram activity. Quinidine (10 μM) and the phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitors cilostazol (10 μM) and milrinone (2.5 μM) restored electrical homogeneity, thus abolishing all late potentials and fractionated electrical activity. CONCLUSIONS: These data point to an alternative pathophysiological basis for late potentials and fractionated electrical activity recorded in the right ventricle in the setting of BrS. We demonstrate an association of such activity with abnormal repolarization and not with abnormal depolarization or structural abnormalities.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that late potentials and fractionated electrogram activity are due to delayed depolarization within the anterior aspects of right ventricular (RV) epicardium in experimental models of Brugada syndrome (BrS). BACKGROUND: Clinical reports have demonstrated late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography (ECG) recorded in patients with BrS. Recent studies report the appearance of late potentials and fractionated activity on bipolar electrograms recorded in the epicardium of the RV outflow tract in patients with BrS. METHODS: Action potential and bipolar electrograms were recorded at epicardial and endocardial sites of coronary-perfused canine RV wedge preparations, together with a pseudo-ECG. The transient outward potassium current agonist NS5806 (5 μM) and the Ca(2+)-channel blocker verapamil (2 μM) were used to pharmacologically mimic the BrS genetic defect. RESULTS: Fractionated electrical activity was observed in RV epicardium, but not in endocardium, as a consequence of heterogeneities in the appearance of the second upstroke of the epicardial action potential, and discrete high-frequency spikes developed as a result of concealed phase 2 re-entry. In no case did we observe primary conduction delay as the cause of the BrS ECG phenotype or of late potential or fractionated electrogram activity. Quinidine (10 μM) and the phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitors cilostazol (10 μM) and milrinone (2.5 μM) restored electrical homogeneity, thus abolishing all late potentials and fractionated electrical activity. CONCLUSIONS: These data point to an alternative pathophysiological basis for late potentials and fractionated electrical activity recorded in the right ventricle in the setting of BrS. We demonstrate an association of such activity with abnormal repolarization and not with abnormal depolarization or structural abnormalities.
Authors: José M Di Diego; Serge Sicouri; Rachel C Myles; Francis L Burton; Godfrey L Smith; Charles Antzelevitch Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: John R Giudicessi; Dan Ye; Chad J Kritzberger; Vladislav V Nesterenko; David J Tester; Charles Antzelevitch; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: R Brugada; J Brugada; C Antzelevitch; G E Kirsch; D Potenza; J A Towbin; P Brugada Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde Journal: Europace Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Junjie Zhang; Mélèze Hocini; Maria Strom; Phillip S Cuculich; Daniel H Cooper; Frédéric Sacher; Michel Haïssaguerre; Yoram Rudy Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-08