| Literature DB >> 24657381 |
Suzanne de Waha1, Steffen Desch2, Ingo Eitel2, Georg Fuernau3, Philipp Lurz2, Marcus Sandri2, Gerhard Schuler2, Holger Thiele3.
Abstract
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation has been the most widely used left ventricular assist device for nearly five decades. Due to diastolic inflation and systolic deflation, coronary blood flow is increased and afterload decreased translating into augmentation of oxygen supply and lowering of oxygen demand. However, IABP may be associated with serious complications, including major bleeding, stroke, local and systemic infections and vascular complications. These might counterbalance the potential beneficial hemodynamic effects. In clinical routine, IABP is mainly used in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction, especially when complicated by cardiogenic shock. Further, prophylactic IABP use is frequently performed in patients at high risk for hemodynamic instability undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Current evidence, however, does not fully support routine use of IABP in these settings. This review focuses on the basic principles of IABP and discusses current evidence.Entities:
Keywords: Basic principles; Clinical evidence; Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation
Year: 2014 PMID: 24657381 DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2014.03.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vascul Pharmacol ISSN: 1537-1891 Impact factor: 5.773