Literature DB >> 24657293

Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics.

Gareth J Harrison1, Thien V How2, Robert J Poole3, John A Brennan4, Jagjeeth B Naik4, S Rao Vallabhaneni4, Robert K Fisher4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis supports patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy (CEA); however, studies indicate considerable variation in practice. The hemodynamic effect of a patch is unclear and this study attempted to elucidate this and guide patch width selection.
METHODS: Four groups were selected: healthy volunteers and patients undergoing CEA with primary closure, trimmed patch (5 mm), or 8-mm patch angioplasty. Computer-generated three-dimensional models of carotid bifurcations were produced from transverse ultrasound images recorded at 1-mm intervals. Rapid prototyping generated models for flow visualization studies. Computational fluid dynamic studies were performed for each model and validated by flow visualization. Mean wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) maps were created for each model using pulsatile inflow at 300 mL/min. WSS of <0.4 Pa and OSI >0.3 were considered pathological, predisposing to accretion of intimal hyperplasia. The resultant WSS and OSI maps were compared.
RESULTS: The four groups comprised 8 normal carotid arteries, 6 primary closures, 6 trimmed patches, and seven 8-mm patches. Flow visualization identified flow separation and recirculation at the bifurcation increased with a patch and was related to the patch width. Computational fluid dynamic identified that primary closure had the fewest areas of low WSS or elevated OSI but did have mild common carotid artery stenoses at the proximal arteriotomy that caused turbulence. Trimmed patches had more regions of abnormal WSS and OSI at the bifurcation, but 8-mm patches had the largest areas of deleteriously low WSS and high OSI. Qualitative comparison among the four groups confirmed that incorporation of a patch increased areas of low WSS and high OSI at the bifurcation and that this was related to patch width.
CONCLUSIONS: Closure technique after CEA influences the hemodynamic profile. Patching does not appear to generate favorable flow dynamics. However, a trimmed 5-mm patch may offer hemodynamic benefits over an 8-mm patch and may be the preferred option.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24657293     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of De Novo Carotid Stenosis and Postintervention Restenosis-Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting-a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Runqi Wangqin; Paul R Krafft; Keaton Piper; Jay Kumar; Kaya Xu; Maxim Mokin; Zeguang Ren
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 6.829

2.  Mitomycin-Treated Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells Suitable for Safe Tissue Engineering Approaches.

Authors:  Irina Zakharova; Shoraan Saaya; Alexander Shevchenko; Alena Stupnikova; Maria Zhiven'; Pavel Laktionov; Alena Stepanova; Alexander Romashchenko; Lyudmila Yanshole; Alexander Chernonosov; Alexander Volkov; Elena Kizilova; Evgenii Zavjalov; Alexander Chernyavsky; Alexander Romanov; Andrey Karpenko; Suren Zakian
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  External ventricular drain as a nontraumatic suction device in carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Alistair Jukes; Rodney Allan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  Patient-Specific, Multi-Scale Modeling of Neointimal Hyperplasia in Vein Grafts.

Authors:  Francesca Donadoni; Cesar Pichardo-Almarza; Matthew Bartlett; Alan Dardik; Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Patch Angioplasty or Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Eline Huizing; Cornelis G Vos; Robin G Hulsebos; Peter J van den Akker; Gert Jan de Borst; Çağdaş Ünlü
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Biomechanical Aspects of Closing Approaches in Postcarotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Idit Avrahami; Dafna Raz; Oranit Bash
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Patient-specific Hemodynamics of Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Before and After Endarterectomy Examined by 4D Flow MRI.

Authors:  Seungbin Ko; Jeesoo Lee; Simon Song; Doosang Kim; Sang Hyung Lee; Jee-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Five-year outcome of non-shunting and primary closure technique during carotid endarterectomy: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Aram Baram; Zana A Mohammed; Sarwer Jamal Al-Bajalan; Fitoon Falah
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.573

9.  Wall Shear Stress and T1 Contrast Ratio Are Associated With Embolic Signals During Carotid Exposure in Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Sotaro Oshida; Futoshi Mori; Makoto Sasaki; Yuiko Sato; Masakazu Kobayshi; Kenji Yoshida; Shunrou Fujiwara; Kuniaki Ogasawara
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.914

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.