Literature DB >> 24656756

Robot-assisted, single-site, dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with the new da Vinci platform: a stage 2a study.

Nicolò Maria Buffi1, Giovanni Lughezzani2, Nicola Fossati2, Massimo Lazzeri2, Giorgio Guazzoni2, Giuliana Lista2, Alessandro Larcher2, Alberto Abrate2, Cristian Fiori3, Andrea Cestari4, Francesco Porpiglia3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has gained popularity in urology over the last few years.
OBJECTIVE: To report a stage 2a study of robot-assisted single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study is an investigative pilot study of 30 consecutive cases of R-LESS pyeloplasty performed at two participating institutions between July 2011 and September 2013. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Dismembered R-LESS pyeloplasty was performed at two surgical centers. MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility (conversion rate), safety (complication rate and Clavien-Dindo classification), efficacy (clinical outcome) of the procedure were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 37 yr (range: 19-65 yr) and median body mass index was 23 kg/m(2) (range: 19-29 kg/m(2)). The median operative time was 160 min (range: 101-300 min), the median postoperative stay was 5 d (range: 3-13 d), and the median time to catheter removal was 3 d (range: 2-10). Two cases required conversion, the first one to standard laparoscopic technique and the second one to standard robotic technique. No intraoperative complications were reported. In three cases, an additional 5-mm trocar was needed. The postoperative complications rate was 26% (n=8). Most of them were grade 1 complications (n=4; 13%), followed by grade 2 (n=3; 10%) and grade 3 (n=1; 3.3%) complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. One patient needed a surgical reintervention with standard robotic technique 3 d after surgery for urinary leakage. The overall success rate, considered as the resolution of symptoms and the absence of functional impairment at postoperative imaging, was 93.3% (n=28) at a median follow-up of 13 mo (range: 3-21 mo). The main limitations of this study are the limited number of patients included and the short-term follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-site robotic pyeloplasty is a feasible technique in selected patients, with good cosmetic results and excellent short-term clinical outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to further assess its role for the treatment of UPJO. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible technique with good cosmetic results and excellent short-term clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pyeloplasty; Robotic surgery; Single site; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656756     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy with the novel da vinci single-site platform: initial experience.

Authors:  Christos Komninos; Patrick Tuliao; Dae Keun Kim; Young Deuk Choi; Byung Ha Chung; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-06-16

2.  Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Cianci; A Rosati; V Rumolo; S Gueli Alletti; V Gallotta; L C Turco; G Corrado; G Vizzielli; A Fagotti; F Fanfani; G Scambia; S Uccella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction.

Authors:  Marshall C Strother; Phillip Mucksavage
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  A modified technique of paraumbilical three-port laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for infants and children.

Authors:  Hualin Cao; Huixia Zhou; Kan Liu; Lifei Ma; Dehong Liu; Tian Tao; Xiaolong Luo; Wei Cheng
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  First Canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: Comparison with multi-incision technique.

Authors:  Jeffrey Law; Neal Rowe; Jason Archambault; Sofia Nastis; Alp Sener; Patrick P Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  One-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty: An attractive alternative to open pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Antonio Marte; Alfonso Papparella
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Current status of robotic single-port surgery.

Authors:  Ryan J Nelson; Jaya Sai S Chavali; Nitin Yerram; Paurush Babbar; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Robot-assisted renal surgery: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Manuela Hiess; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 9.  Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Mikolaj Mendrek; Thomas Alexander Vögeli; Christian Bach
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.