Literature DB >> 24656737

Reporting success rates in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas: are we accounting for the natural history?

Timothy Miller1, Tsz Lau1, Rohit Vasan1, Christopher Danner1, A Samy Youssef1, Harry van Loveren1, Siviero Agazzi2.   

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery is generally accepted as one of the best treatment options for vestibular schwannomas. We question whether growth control is an accurate measure of success in vestibular schwannoma treatment. We aim to clarify the success rate of stereotactic radiosurgery and adjust the reported results to the benign natural history of untreated tumors. All articles were taken from a PubMed search of the English literature from the years 2000-2011. Inclusion criteria were articles containing the number of patients treated, radiation technique, average tumor size, follow-up time, and percentage of tumors growing during follow-up. Data were extracted from 19 articles. Success rates were adjusted using published data that 17% to 30% of vestibular schwannomas grow. The average reported success rate for stereotactic radiosurgery across all articles was 95.5%. When considering 17% or 30% natural growth without intervention, the adjusted success rates became 78.2% and 86.9% respectively. These rates were obtained by applying the natural history growth percentages to any tumors not reported to be growing before radiosurgical intervention. Success in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas with stereotactic radiosurgery is often defined as lack of further growth. Recent data on the natural growth history of vestibular schwannomas raise the question of whether this is the best definition of success. We have identified a lack of continuity regarding the reporting of success and emphasize the importance of the clarification of the success of radiosurgery to make informed decisions regarding the best treatment options for vestibular schwannoma.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic neuroma; Radiosurgery; Treatment; Vestibular schwannoma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656737     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  3 in total

1.  CT- and MRI-based gross target volume comparison in vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Bhudevi Soubhagya N Kulkarni; Harjot Bajwa; Mukka Chandrashekhar; Sunil Dutt Sharma; Rohith Singareddy; Dileep Gudipudi; Shabbir Ahmad; Alok Kumar; N V N Madusudan Sresty; Alluri Krishnam Raju
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-22

Review 2.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards.

Authors:  Scott G Soltys; Michael T Milano; Jinyu Xue; Wolfgang A Tomé; Ellen Yorke; Jason Sheehan; George X Ding; John P Kirkpatrick; Lijun Ma; Arjun Sahgal; Timothy Solberg; John Adler; Jimm Grimm; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 8.013

3.  Multi-option therapy vs observation for small acoustic neuroma: hearing-focused management.

Authors:  E Zanoletti; D Cazzador; C Faccioli; S Gallo; L Denaro; D D'Avella; A Martini; A Mazzoni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.