Literature DB >> 24656176

Prevalence and clinical consequences of fracture and fragment migration of the Bard G2 filter: imaging and clinical follow-up in 684 implantations.

Tianzhi An1, Eunice Moon1, Jennifer Bullen2, Baljendra Kapoor1, Alex Wu1, Mark Sands1, Weiping Wang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and clinical sequelae of G2 filter (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Arizona) fractures and fragment migration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent G2 filter placement between October 2005 and February 2010 were assessed for filter fractures and complications. Fracture prevalence was estimated at various time points based on data from patients with known fracture status.
RESULTS: Among 829 patients who underwent G2 filter placement, 684 had follow-up imaging and qualified for the study (381 men and 303 women; average age, 60.3 y; range, 15.8-95.2 y). For 541 (79%) patients, at least one image was available that contained the filter (imaging follow-up interval, 14.9 mo ± 20.0; range, 0-78.6 mo); images that did not include the filter but may have shown the migrated fracture fragment were available for 143 (21%) patients (follow-up interval, 11.2 mo ± 19.3; range, 0-83.4 mo). There were 16 fractured limbs identified in 13 patients (incidence, 1.9%; follow-up interval, 30.4 mo ± 18.7; range, 5.5-76.5 mo). Fracture fragments were identified in the pulmonary arteries (n = 4), right ventricle (n = 2), pericardium (n = 1), iliac vein (n = 1), and kidney (n = 1). Four fracture limbs remained near the filter; the remaining three could not be located. All patients with filter fracture were asymptomatic. The estimated 5-year fracture prevalence was 38% (95% confidence interval, 22.9%, 54.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The early occurrence of G2 filter fractures was low, but the incidence increased over time. No life-threatening events occurred in patients with filter fracture during the study time frame.
Copyright © 2014 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656176     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

Review 1.  Procedural and indwelling complications with inferior vena cava filters: frequency, etiology, and management.

Authors:  Lazar Milovanovic; Sean A Kennedy; Mehran Midia
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Permanent versus Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Rethinking the "One-Filter-for-All" Approach to Mechanical Thromboembolic Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christine E Ghatan; Robert K Ryu
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Evidence-Based Evaluation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Complications Based on Filter Type.

Authors:  Steven E Deso; Ibrahim A Idakoji; William T Kuo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Migration of a fractured inferior vena cava filter strut to the right ventricle of the heart.

Authors:  Zeyad Sako; Sindhu Reddy Avula; Elissa Gaies; Rebecca Daniel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-21

5.  Duodenocaval Fistula from an Inferior Vena Cava Filter Perforation.

Authors:  Ulugbek Negmadjanov; Michael Dedwylder; Polina Gaisinskaya; David Forcione; W Anthony Lee
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2022-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.