| Literature DB >> 24655022 |
D M Seelig1, P Avery, T Webb, J Yoshimoto, J Bromberek, E J Ehrhart, A C Avery.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine T-cell lymphoma (TCL) is clinically and histologically heterogeneous with some forms, such as T-zone lymphoma (TZL), having an indolent course. Immunophenotyping is an important tool in the classification of TCL in people, and can be equally useful in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/Entities:
Keywords: Flow cytometry; Golden retriever; Leukemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24655022 PMCID: PMC4895451 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Intern Med ISSN: 0891-6640 Impact factor: 3.333
Figure 1Immunophenotypic features of cells from patients with TZL. (A) Plot of a lymph node aspirate demonstrating the CD45+ (purple) and CD45− T cells (green). The cells in red are B cells (as determined by expression of CD21, but not CD5, plot not shown) and are shown for comparison of CD21 expression. (B) Representative plots of cell size, CD21 expression, class II MHC expression, and CD25 expression on CD45− and CD45+ T cells in the same patient using color gates described in A. The histograms are scaled so that populations with different cell numbers can be compared, so the Y axis does not have units. B‐cell expression of CD21 is shown (red), but not B‐cell expression of class II MHC or CD25. (C) Summary data for all cases assessed with the multicolor panel. Each plot shows the level of expression of the indicated parameter in CD45+ and CD45− cells determined in the same dog, and the values for an individual dog are joined by lines. All parameters are mean fluorescence intensity except for CD25 expression, which is a percentage of positive cells. All comparisons between neoplastic and nonneoplastic cells were statistically significant (P < .05) as determined by the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test applied to the difference in log median fluorescence (class II MHC and CD21), the difference in percent positive (CD25), or the ratio of the linear forward scatter value (size).
Antibody panels used for immunophenotyping.
| Tube | Antibody Specificity and Fluorochrome |
|---|---|
| Panel 1 (two color) | |
| 1 | None |
| 2 | M |
| 3 | CD18‐FITC/M IgG1‐PE |
| 4 | CD4‐FITC/CD8‐PE |
| 5 | CD5‐FITC/CD21‐PE |
| 6 | CD3‐FITC/CD45‐PE |
| 7 | CD4‐FITC/CD14‐PE |
| 8 | Class II MHC‐FITC/CD34‐PE |
| Panel 2 (multicolor) | |
| 1 | M IgG1‐FITC/M IgG1‐PE/M IgG1‐Alexa 647/M IgG1‐Alexa 700/M IgG1‐PE‐750/M IgG1‐Pacific Blue |
| 2 | CD3‐FITC/CD25‐PE/CD5‐APC/CD8‐Alexa 700/CD4‐Pacific Blue |
| 3 | Class II MHC‐FITC/CD22‐PE/CD21‐Alexa 647 |
| 4 | Class II MHC‐FITC/CD34‐PE/CD5‐APC—CD14‐PE‐Alexa 750 |
| 5 | Class II MHC‐FITC/CD18‐PE/CD5‐APC/CD14 PE‐Alexa 750/CD4‐Pacific Blue |
| 6 | CD5‐FITC/CD45‐PE/CD21‐Alexa 647 |
The first 9 cases in the study were analyzed using this panel, and the remainder were analyzed with the more extensive panel 2.
Mouse.
Unless otherwise noted, all antibodies were purchased from AbD Serotec. Clones are as follows: CD45 = YKIX716.13, CD18 = YFC118.3 (human CD18), CD4 = YKIX302.9, CD8 =YCATE 55.9, CD5 = YKIX322.3, CD21 = CA2.1D6, CD22 = RFB4 (human CD22, purchased from AbCam), CD3 = CA17.2A12, CD14 = UCHM (human, used in panel 1) and CD14 = TUK4 (human, used in panel 2), class II MHC = YKIX334.2, CD34 = 1H6, CD25 = P2A10 (purchased from eBiosciences).
Comparison of clinical characteristics of dogs in this study with characteristics of all dogs having the same immunophenotype.
| Clinical Feature | Dogs in this Study (20) | All Other Dogs (494) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphocytosis | 53% (8/15) | 94% (407/432) | NA |
| Lymphadenopathy | 100% (20/20) | 76% (168/222) | NA |
| CD8 subset | 45% (9/20) | 33% (162/494) | 0.6 |
| CD4 subset | 15% (3/20) | 16% (81/494) | |
| CD4‐CD8‐ subset | 40% (8/20) | 49% (245/494) | |
| Golden Retrievers | 45% (9/20) | 40% (187/471) | 0.8 |
| Shih Tzu | 5% (1/20) | 8% (38/471) | |
| Other | 50% (10/20) | 52% (246/471) | |
| Female | 55% (11/20) | 47% (229/487) | 0.65 |
| Age (median) | 9.9 | 10.6 | 0.01 |
Statistical tests were: chi‐square for comparison of the lymphocyte subset distribution, sex distribution, and comparison of breeds, Fisher's test for comparison of breeds, and t‐test for median age. NA = not analyzed, because these parameters were used to define the 2 groups.
Lymphocytosis is defined as greater than 5,000 cells/μL.
The values represent the number of dogs for which the characteristic was present/the total number of dogs for which information about that characteristic was available. For example, in this study, information about the presenting lymphocyte count was available for 15 dogs.
NA = not analyzed because these parameters were used to define the population.
Fewer than 1% of dogs in the entire population were listed as nonneutered or unknown. Therefore, sex was analyzed simply as male or female.
Comparison of dogs with CD45− T‐cell disease that present with and without lymphadenopathy.
| Clinical Feature | Dogs with Lymphadenopathy (190) | Dogs without Lymphadenopathy (52) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphadenopathy | 100% (190/190) | 0% (0/52) | NA |
| Lymphocytosis | 72% (92/124) | 100% (52/52) | NA |
| CD8 subset | 37% (71/190) | 23% (12/52) | 0.06 |
| CD4 subset | 13% (24/190) | 23% (12/52) | |
| CD4‐CD8‐ subset | 49% (93/190) | 52% (27/52) | |
| Golden Retrievers | 38% (71/185) | 42% (22/52) | 0.44 |
| Shih Tzu | 9% (17/185) | 4% (2/52) | |
| Other | 53% (97/185) | 54% (28/52) | |
| Female | 44% (83/189) | 55% (28/51) | 0.2 |
| Age (median) | 10.3 | 11.25 | 0.06 |
Statistical tests were: chi‐square for comparison of the lymphocyte subset distribution, sex distribution, and comparison of breeds, Fisher's test for comparison of breeds, and t‐test for median age. NA = not analyzed, because these parameters were used to define the two groups.
Lymphocytosis is defined as greater than 5,000 cells/μL.
The values represent the number of dogs for which the characteristic was present/the total number of dogs for which information about that characteristic was available. For example, in this study, information about the presenting lymphocyte count was available for 15 dogs.
NA = not analyzed because these parameters were used to define the population.
Fewer than 1% of dogs in the entire population were listed as nonneutered or unknown. Therefore, sex was analyzed simply as male or female.
Figure 2The histologic and immunohistologic features of canine T‐zone lymphoma (TZL). Lymph node tissue is from a 9‐year‐old Shih Tzu breed with TZL, which demonstrates light microscopic (A,B) (hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)‐stained) and immunohistochemical (C,D) features representative of all 13 cases. In A, note the thinned nodal capsule and the compressed remnant fading follicles (black arrows) owing to the eccentric population of proliferating cells. Higher magnification view of A reveals a proliferating population of small cells with abundant, clear cytoplasm and oval nuclei with frequent, sharp, shallow indentations (B, white arrows). Immunohistochemistry confirms the T‐cell phenotype of the proliferating population through uniform, heavy CD3‐immunoreactivity (C, brown) and absent Pax5 immunoreactivity (D, red). However, note the heavy Pax5‐immunoreactivity in the residual, compressed follicular B cells (D, red). E and F show normal lymph nodes stained for Pax5 (E) and CD3 (F) for comparison. Bars: B = 25 μm, C,D = 300 μm.