Literature DB >> 24653472

Patients with pancreatic cancer and relatives talk about preferred place of death and what influenced their preferences: a qualitative study.

Alison Chapple1, Julie Evans, Ann McPherson, Sheila Payne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore reasons why people with pancreatic cancer, who are reaching the end of their lives, say they wish to die at home or elsewhere, and why preferences may change.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews followed by thematic analysis.
SETTING: Respondents recruited from different parts of the UK during 2009/2010. PARTICIPANTS: 16 people with experience of pancreatic cancer (8 patients and 8 bereaved relatives) who discussed place of death in detail during an in-depth interview (from a total sample of 32 people with pancreatic cancer and eight relatives of others who had died of this disease).
RESULTS: People's preferences were affected by their perceptions and previous experiences of care available at home, in a hospice or hospital. Preferences were also shaped by fears about possible loss of dignity, or fears of becoming a burden. Some people thought that a home death might leave bad memories for other members of the family. People with pancreatic cancer and their relatives were aware that preferences might change (or had changed) as death approached.
CONCLUSIONS: The National Health Service End of Life Care Strategy for England seeks to meet the needs of people who are dying and promotes better support for home deaths. More information is needed about why patients hold different views about place of care and place of death, why patients' preferences change and what importance patients attach to place of death. Health professionals should bear this in mind if the subject is raised during advance care planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 24653472     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  6 in total

1.  A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity.

Authors:  Keith Zi Yuan Chua; Elaine Li Ying Quah; Yun Xue Lim; Chloe Keyi Goh; Jieyu Lim; Darius Wei Jun Wan; Simone Meiqi Ong; Chi Sum Chong; Kennan Zhi Guang Yeo; Laura Shih Hui Goh; Ray Meng See; Alexia Sze Inn Lee; Yun Ting Ong; Min Chiam; Eng Koon Ong; Jamie Xuelian Zhou; Crystal Lim; Simon Yew Kuang Ong; Lalit Krishna
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.113

2.  Defining sustainability in practice: views from implementing real-world innovations in health care.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Cynthia Kendell; Evelyn Cornelissen; Laura L Madden; Byron J Powell; Glenn Kissmann; Sarah A Richmond; Cameron Willis; Jackie L Bender
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Decision-Making about the Place of Death for Cancer Patients: A Concept Analysis.

Authors:  Yoko Minamiguchi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-12-05

4.  Symptom Prevalence and Place of Death Preference in Advanced Cancer Patients: Factors Associated With the Achievement of Home Death.

Authors:  Julia Fee Voon Ho; Nur Syafiqah Marzuki; Nur Syuhadah Monica Meseng; Viknaswary Kaneisan; Yin Khek Lum; Eunice Wan Wen Pui; Hayati Yaakup
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.090

5.  After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care.

Authors:  Kathryn Almack; Karen Cox; Nima Moghaddam; Kristian Pollock; Jane Seymour
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Psychological stress and pancreatic cancer patients: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Ann M Mazzella Ebstein; Simi Jesto Joseph; Marisol Hernandez
Journal:  JBI Evid Synth       Date:  2020-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.