Literature DB >> 24651248

Acoustic bubble sorting for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.

Tim Segers1, Michel Versluis.   

Abstract

An ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) suspension contains encapsulated microbubbles with a wide size distribution, with radii ranging from 1 to 10 μm. Medical transducers typically operate at a single frequency, therefore only a small selection of bubbles will resonate to the driving ultrasound pulse. Thus, the sensitivity can be improved by narrowing down the size distribution. Here, we present a simple lab-on-a-chip method to sort the population of microbubbles on-chip using a traveling ultrasound wave. First, we explore the physical parameter space of acoustic bubble sorting using well-defined bubble sizes formed in a flow-focusing device, then we demonstrate successful acoustic sorting of a commercial UCA. This novel sorting strategy may lead to an overall improvement of the sensitivity of contrast ultrasound by more than 10 dB.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24651248     DOI: 10.1039/c3lc51296g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  10 in total

Review 1.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Loss of gas from echogenic liposomes exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tao Peng; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Ultrasound-based cell sorting with microbubbles: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas J Matula; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Lev A Ostrovsky; Andrew A Brayman; John Kucewicz; Brian E MacConaghy; Dino De Raad
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Closed-loop feedback control of microbubble diameter from a flow-focusing microfluidic device.

Authors:  Yanjun Xie; Adam J Dixon; J M Robert Rickel; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  The effect of size range on ultrasound-induced translations in microbubble populations.

Authors:  Outi Supponen; Awaneesh Upadhyay; Jordan Lum; Francesco Guidi; Todd Murray; Hendrik J Vos; Piero Tortoli; Mark Borden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Formulation and Characterization of Chemically Cross-linked Microbubble Clusters.

Authors:  Ronald L Hall; Zachary D Juan-Sing; Kenneth Hoyt; Shashank R Sirsi
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Investigation of the Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles in a Microfluidic Channel with Actuations.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Shang; Xiaoyang Huang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Size-isolation of ultrasound-mediated phase change perfluorocarbon droplets using differential centrifugation.

Authors:  Karla P Mercado; Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kyle Stewart; Lindsay Snider; Devin Ryan; Kevin J Haworth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Recombinant protein-stabilized monodisperse microbubbles with tunable size using a valve-based microfluidic device.

Authors:  Francesco E Angilè; Kevin B Vargo; Chandra M Sehgal; Daniel A Hammer; Daeyeon Lee
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  Optical verification and in-vitro characterization of two commercially available acoustic bubble counters for cardiopulmonary bypass systems.

Authors:  Tim Segers; Marco C Stehouwer; Filip M J J de Somer; Bastian A de Mol; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.