Literature DB >> 24650900

A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates.

Ryan E Moore1, Keith Baldwin2, Matthew S Austin3, Samir Mehta2.   

Abstract

Few comparative studies exist for open reduction and internal fixation of Vancouver B1 and C fractures. We therefore performed a systematic review of fractures treated with or without an allograft strut, and using various fixation techniques. Thirty-seven manuscripts including 682 fractures were identified between 1992 and 2012. Percent union was similar for Vancouver B1 fractures treated with or without an allograft strut (90.7% vs. 91.5%). Time to union (4.4 vs. 6.6 months) and deep infection (3.8% vs. 8.3%) were increased with use of allograft struts. Percent union and time to union were unaffected by plate type or use of cerclage. We conclude that due to increased infection and time to union, allograft struts should be used cautiously during operative treatment of Vancouver B1 factures.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allograft strut; open reduction and internal fixation; periprosthetic femur fracture; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24650900     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  21 in total

1.  Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Carl Haasper; Mohammad Ali Enayatollahi; Thorsten Gehrke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanics of periprosthetic femur fractures and early weightbearing.

Authors:  Ansab Khwaja; William Mahoney; Jay Johnson; Alex Trompeter; Jason Lowe
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-14

3.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

4.  Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?

Authors:  Long Zheng; Woo-Yong Lee; Deuk-Soo Hwang; Chan Kang; Chang-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 5.  Influence of graft source and configuration on revision rate and patient-reported outcomes after MPFL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James M Weinberger; Peter D Fabricant; Samuel A Taylor; Jenny Y Mei; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems].

Authors:  M Fuchs; C Perka; P von Roth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

Review 8.  [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum and femur : Causes-classification-treatment algorithms].

Authors:  D M Ates; P Koenen; R Otchwemah; H Bäthis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Feasibility of the Inner-Side-Out Use of the LC-DCP for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Heejae Won; Jun-Young Kim; Seung-Hoon Baek; Wonki Hong; Jee-Wook Yoon; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Cortical strut allografts in salvage revision arthroplasty: Surgical technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Veenesh Selvaratnam; Mikhil Jain; Tim N Board; Nikhil Shah
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.