Literature DB >> 24650691

Should we await IFN-free regimens to treat HCV genotype 1 treatment-naive patients? A cost-effectiveness analysis (ANRS 95141).

Sylvie Deuffic-Burban1, Michaël Schwarzinger2, Dorothée Obach2, Vincent Mallet3, Stanislas Pol4, Georges-Philippe Pageaux5, Valérie Canva6, Pierre Deltenre7, Françoise Roudot-Thoraval8, Dominique Larrey5, Daniel Dhumeaux9, Philippe Mathurin10, Yazdan Yazdanpanah11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In treatment-naive patients mono-infected with genotype 1 chronic HCV, treatments with telaprevir/boceprevir (TVR/BOC)-based triple therapy are standard-of-care. However, more efficacious direct-acting antivirals (IFN-based new DAAs) are available and interferon-free (IFN-free) regimens are imminent (2015).
METHODS: A mathematical model estimated quality-adjusted life years, cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of (i) IFN-based new DAAs vs. TVR/BOC-based triple therapy; and (ii) IFN-based new DAAs initiation strategies, given that IFN-free regimens are imminent. The sustained virological response in F3-4/F0-2 was 71/89% with IFN-based new DAAs, 85/95% with IFN-free regimens, vs. 64/80% with TVR/BOC-based triple therapy. Serious adverse events leading to discontinuation were taken as: 0-0.6% with IFN-based new DAAs, 0% with IFN-free regimens, vs. 1-10% with TVR/BOC-based triple therapy. Costs were €60,000 for 12weeks of IFN-based new DAAs and two times higher for IFN-free regimens.
RESULTS: Treatment with IFN-based new DAAs when fibrosis stage ⩾F2 is cost-effective compared to TVR/BOC-based triple therapy (€37,900/QALY gained), but not at F0-1 (€103,500/QALY gained). Awaiting the IFN-free regimens is more effective, except in F4 patients, but not cost-effective compared to IFN-based new DAAs. If we decrease the cost of IFN-free regimens close to that of IFN-based new DAAs, then awaiting the IFN-free regimen becomes cost-effective.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IFN-based new DAAs at stage ⩾F2 is both effective and cost-effective compared to TVR/BOC triple therapy. Awaiting IFN-free regimens and then treating regardless of fibrosis is more efficacious, except in F4 patients; however, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy is highly dependent on its cost.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boceprevir; Chronic hepatitis C; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Direct-acting antivirals; Genotype 1; Interferon-free regimens; Model-based analysis; Telaprevir; Treatment initiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24650691     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  16 in total

1.  Using pharmacokinetic and viral kinetic modeling to estimate the antiviral effectiveness of telaprevir, boceprevir, and pegylated interferon during triple therapy in treatment-experienced hepatitis C virus-infected cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Cédric Laouénan; Patrick Marcellin; Martine Lapalus; Feryel Khelifa-Mouri; Nathalie Boyer; Fabien Zoulim; Lawrence Serfaty; Jean-Pierre Bronowicki; Michelle Martinot-Peignoux; Olivier Lada; Tarik Asselah; Céline Dorival; Christophe Hézode; Fabrice Carrat; Florence Nicot; Gilles Peytavin; France Mentré; Jeremie Guedj
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Anti-hepatitis C virus potency of a new autophagy inhibitor using human liver slices model.

Authors:  Sylvie Lagaye; Sonia Brun; Jesintha Gaston; Hong Shen; Ruzena Stranska; Claire Camus; Clarisse Dubray; Géraldine Rousseau; Pierre-Philippe Massault; Jerôme Courcambeck; Firas Bassisi; Philippe Halfon; Stanislas Pol
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-28

3.  Assessing the Effect of Potential Reductions in Non-Hepatic Mortality on the Estimated Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatitis C Treatment in Early Stages of Liver Disease.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Harrell W Chesson; Philip R Spradling; Scott D Holmberg
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment for patients in early stages of liver disease.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Harrell W Chesson; Fujie Xu; John W Ward; Philip R Spradling; Scott D Holmberg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Cost-effectiveness of new antiviral regimens for treatment-naïve U.S. veterans with hepatitis C.

Authors:  Alexis P Chidi; Shari Rogal; Cindy L Bryce; Michael J Fine; Chester B Good; Larissa Myaskovsky; Vinod K Rustgi; Allan Tsung; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Modelling of Sofosbuvir-Containing Regimens for Chronic Genotype 5 Hepatitis C Virus Infection in South Africa.

Authors:  Ilanca Fraser; Johanita Burger; Martie Lubbe; George Dranitsaris; Mark Sonderup; Tienie Stander
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of sofosbuvir compared to current standard treatment in Swiss patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Alena M Pfeil; Oliver Reich; Ines M Guerra; Sandrine Cure; Francesco Negro; Beat Müllhaupt; Daniel Lavanchy; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Egypt 2015: implications for future policy on prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Amr Kandeel; Mohamad Genedy; Samir El-Refai; Anna L Funk; Arnaud Fontanet; Maha Talaat
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.828

9.  Cost-effectiveness of Interferon-free therapy for Hepatitis C in Germany--an application of the efficiency frontier approach.

Authors:  Christian Gissel; Georg Götz; Jörg Mahlich; Holger Repp
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Clinical impact of treatment timing for chronic hepatitis C infection: a decision model.

Authors:  M T Pho; D M Jensen; D O Meltzer; A Y Kim; B P Linas
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.517

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.