Literature DB >> 24650488

The science of medical decision making: neurosurgery, errors, and personal cognitive strategies for improving quality of care.

Kyle M Fargen1, William A Friedman2.   

Abstract

During the last 2 decades, there has been a shift in the U.S. health care system towards improving the quality of health care provided by enhancing patient safety and reducing medical errors. Unfortunately, surgical complications, patient harm events, and malpractice claims remain common in the field of neurosurgery. Many of these events are potentially avoidable. There are an increasing number of publications in the medical literature in which authors address cognitive errors in diagnosis and treatment and strategies for reducing such errors, but these are for the most part absent in the neurosurgical literature. The purpose of this article is to highlight the complexities of medical decision making to a neurosurgical audience, with the hope of providing insight into the biases that lead us towards error and strategies to overcome our innate cognitive deficiencies. To accomplish this goal, we review the current literature on medical errors and just culture, explain the dual process theory of cognition, identify common cognitive errors affecting neurosurgeons in practice, review cognitive debiasing strategies, and finally provide simple methods that can be easily assimilated into neurosurgical practice to improve clinical decision making.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive debiasing; Malpractice; Medical decision making; Medical error; Neurosurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24650488     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Aborting a neurosurgical procedure: analyzing the decision factors, with endoscopic third ventriculostomy as a model.

Authors:  Jonathan Roth; Shlomi Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Is there any gender or age-related discrepancy in the waiting time for each step in the surgical management of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury?

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; B Catharine Craven; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.

Authors:  Narinder Kapur; Anam Parand; Tayana Soukup; Tom Reader; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2015-12-02

4.  Cognitive biases in orbital mass lesions - Lessons learned.

Authors:  Heather M McDonald; James P Farmer; Paula L Blanco
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.