Literature DB >> 24649961

Long-term outcomes of second treatment after initial transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Young-Il Kim1, Joong-Won Park, Hee-Won Kwak, Bo Hyun Kim, Ju Hee Lee, In Joon Lee, Tae Hyun Kim, Seong Hoon Kim, Young Hwan Koh, Hyun Beom Kim, Chang-Min Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: All outcome studies concerning the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are based on the initial treatment. However, remaining, progressing or recurring tumours (RPRTs) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are common; therefore, various second treatments are administered to HCC patients. Here, we investigated the long-term outcomes of second treatments for RPRT after initial TACE.
METHODS: We enrolled 855 consecutive HCC patients who underwent TACE as the initial treatment at the National Cancer Center, Korea, from January 2004 to December 2010.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 43.4 months, and the median progression-free survival following initial TACE was 4.0 months, being 18.1 and 1.0 months for complete remission and progressive disease respectively. Second treatments were administered to 790 RPRT patients (92.4%); the most common was TACE (56.4%), followed by best supportive care (22.8%), systemic chemotherapy (9.4%), external radiotherapy (4.4%), radiation ablation (RFA; 2.9%), resection (2.0%) and liver transplantation (1.4%). Median overall survival (mOS) for initial TACE was 18.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.6-21.0 months]; after second treatments, it was 12.4 (95% CI, 10.6-14.2) months, differing significantly by mRECIST assessment, BCLC stage and RPRT type (28.0, 5.0 and 3.9 months for intrahepatic, vascular and extrahepatic RPRT, respectively; P < 0.001). Intrahepatic RPRT with a curative treatment as a second treatment showed the best OS.
CONCLUSION: These novel insights into the patterns and long-term outcomes of second treatments for RPRT in HCC patients who underwent initial TACE are expected to aid in formulating treatment strategies for HCC patients.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TACE; hepatocellular carcinoma; outcome; second treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24649961     DOI: 10.1111/liv.12535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  4 in total

1.  Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: why do we keep failing?

Authors:  Bo Hyun Kim; Joong-Won Park
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11

2.  Korean Version of a Model to Estimate Survival in Ambulatory Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (K-MESIAH).

Authors:  Byung-Ho Nam; Joong-Won Park; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Sang Soo Lee; Ami Yu; Bo Hyun Kim; W Ray Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  All-treatment array of hepatocellular carcinoma from initial diagnosis to death: observation of cumulative treatments.

Authors:  Hae Moon; Ji Eun Choi; In Joon Lee; Tae Hyun Kim; Seong Hoon Kim; Young Hwan Ko; Hyun Boem Kim; Byung-Ho Nam; Joong-Won Park
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Image-Based Analysis of Tumor Localization After Intra-Arterial Delivery of Technetium-99m-Labeled SPIO Using SPECT/CT and MRI.

Authors:  In Joon Lee; Ji Yong Park; Young-Il Kim; Yun-Sang Lee; Jae Min Jeong; Jaeil Kim; Euishin Edmund Kim; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Soo Lee; Seonji Jeong; Eun Jeong Kim; Young Il Kim; Jin Wook Chung
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.488

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.