| Literature DB >> 24649474 |
Ji Ae Hur1, Joon Won Kang2, Hoon-Chul Kang1, Heung Dong Kim1, Jeong Tae Kim1, Joon Soo Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Epilepsy; Insular; PET; Pediatric; Post-operative outcome; Surgery
Year: 2013 PMID: 24649474 PMCID: PMC3952253 DOI: 10.14581/jer.13011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Epilepsy Res ISSN: 2233-6249
Specific parameters of Engel’s classification of post-surgical outcome
| Class I | Free of disabling seizures |
| a | Seizure free |
| b | Non-disabling prodromal symptoms only |
| c | Seizure free for the last two years |
| d | Convulsions with AED discontinuation only |
| Class II | Rare disabling seizures |
| a | Initially seizure free, rare seizures now |
| b | Rare disabling seizures |
| c | Rare seizures for the last 2 years |
| d | Nocturnal seizures only |
| Class III | Worthwhile improvement |
| a | Worthwhile seizure reduction |
| b | Prolonged seizure free periods, not <2 years |
| Class IV | No worthwhile improvement |
| a | Significant seizure reduction |
| b | No appreciable change |
| c | Worse seizures |
Specific parameters of MRI seizure phase I protocol
| FOV (mm) | Matrix | Spatial Resolution (mm) | Thickness/Gap (mm) | Etc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1W SAG | 230×200 | 256×186 | 0.9×1.12 | 5/1 | Conventional spin echo |
| T2W AX | 230×184 | 400×255 | 0.57×0.72 | 5/2 | |
| T2W Flair AX | 230×183 | 352×189 | 0.65×0.97 | 5/2 | |
| T2W Oblique-COR | 230×183 | 512×324 | 0.45×0.57 | 3/0.3 | |
| T2W Flair Oblique-COR | 230×182 | 352×189 | 0.65×0.97 | 3/0.3 | |
| T1W 3D COR | 220×220 | 224×224 | 0.98×0.98 | 1.5 | 3D T1W TFE |
MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; T1W, T1 Weighted; T2W, T2 Weighted; AX, Axial; COR, Coronal; 3D, 3 dimensional; TFE, ultrafast gradient echo.
Description of the study population
| Px No | Sex | Sz semiology | Age of Sz onset | Duration of Sz until Op | Frequency of Sz/month | No of AED at surgery | Operation | Site | Area | Pathological Dx (Cortex) | Pathological Dx (Hippo-campus) | MRI | PET | PET insular involvement | Engel class | Duration of F/U (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | GTCS | 14.00 | 1.00 | 30 | 3 (LMT, VGB, OXC) | Lobectomy | Rt | ATL+AH | Microdysgenesis | Hippocampal sclerosis | 1+2 | 1+2 | N | 1a | 2.67 |
| 2 | F | SPS | 5.00 | 13.00 | 90 | 2 (TPM, OXC) | Lobectomy | Rt | ATL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 1 | 1 | N | 1a | 2.58 |
| 3 | M | CPS c 2ndary Gen | 7.00 | 6.20 | 12 | 3 (TPM, OXC, CBZ) | Lobectomy | Lt | ATL+AH +IC | Microdysgenesis | Hippocampal sclerosis | 1+2 | 1+2 | Y | 2a | 2.5 |
| 4 | M | CPS c 2ndary Gen | 10.00 | 12.00 | 180 | 3 (CZP, TPM, LEV) | Lobectomy | Rt | ATL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 5 | 4 | N | 2b | 2.5 |
| 5 | M | CPS | 8.00 | 7.50 | 3 | 2 (TPM, OXC) | Lobectomy | Rt | ATL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 2 | 1+2 | Y | 2b | 2.08 |
| 6 | M | CPS | 7.00 | 15.00 | 1 | 2 (VPA, TPM) | Lobectomy | Lt | ATL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 2+3 | 1+2 | N | 1a | 1.67 |
| 7 | M | CPS c 2ndary Gen | 5.00 | 2.17 | 60 | 2 (OXC, LEV) | Lobectomy | Lt | TL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 2 | 2 | Y | 1a | 1.5 |
| 8 | M | CPS | 11.00 | 5.00 | 240 | 2 (OXC, TPM) | Lobectomy | Lt | TL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 1+2 | 1+2 | Y | 1a | 1.33 |
| 9 | F | EPC | 4.00 | 1.50 | 300 | 5 (TPM, LEV, VPA, OXC, CLZ) | Lobectomy | Rt | TL+IC | Cortical dysplasia | 3+4 | 3 | Y | 2b | 1.25 | |
| 10 | M | CPS | 4.00 | 4.33 | 15 | 4 (VPA, LEV, VGB, TPM) | Lobectomy | Lt | ATL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 1+2 | 1+2 | N | 1a | 0.83 |
| 11 | F | CPS | 4.00 | 12.00 | 90 | 3 (OXC, ZSM, VPA) | Lobectomy | Lt | ATL+AH | Normal | Hippocampal sclerosis | 2 | 1 | N | 1a | 0.67 |
| 12 | M | CPS c 2ndary Gen | 0.17 | 5.58 | 240 | 3 (VGB, CBZ, OXC) | Lobectomy | Lt | TL+AH +IC | Microdysgenesis | Normal | 1+3 | Y | 3a | 2.75 | |
| 13 | M | CPS | 8.50 | 3.50 | 2 | 4 (VGB, CBZ, TPM, OXC) | Lobectomy | Lt | ATL+AH | Cortical dysplasia | Normal | 1 | 1 | Y | 1a | 1.5 |
Px, Patient; Sz, Seizure; Op, Operation; AED, Antiepileptic drug; Dx, Diagnosis; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; PET, Positron emission tomography; F/U, Follow-up; GTCS, Generalized tonic clonic seizure; LMT, Lamotrigine; VGB, Vigabatrin; OXC, Oxcarbamazepine; ATL, Anterior temporal lobectomy; AH, Amygdalohippocampectomy; SPS, Simple partial seizure; TPM, Topiramate; CPS c 2ndary Gen, Complex partial seizure with secondary generalization; CBZ, Clobazam; CZP, Carbamazepine; LEV, Levetiracetam; VPA, Valproic acid; TL, Radical temporal lobectomy; EPC, Epilepsia partialis continua; CLZ, Clonazepam; IC, Insular cortisectomy; ZSM, Zonisamide.
MRI data abbreviates: 1, Temporal lesion visible; 2, Hippocampal sclerosis; 3, Mesiotemporal sclerosis; 4, Insular lesion visible; 5, Normal.
PET data abbreviates: 1, Temporal hypometabolism; 2, Mesiotemporal hypometabolism; 3, Basal ganglia hypometabolism; 4: Generalized decreased uptake; 5, Normal.
Comparison of clinical characteristics by presence of insular hypometabolism on [18F]FDG-PET
| Variables | PET positive (n=7) | PET negative (n=6) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 6 (85.7) | 4 (66.7) | 0.559 |
| Female | 1 (14.3) | 2 (33.3) | ||
| Site | Right | 2 (28.6) | 3 (50.0) | 0.592 |
| Left | 5 (71.4) | 3 (50.0) | ||
| Age at operation | 10.55 (±4.427) | 17.06 (±5.332) | 0.040 | |
| Onset age | 6.24 (±3.532) | 7.33 (±3.983) | 0.914 | |
| Seizure duration | 4.49 (±2.188) | 9.56 (±5.549) | 0.168 | |
| Seizure frequency/mon | 122.43 (±131.679) | 67.67 (±66.713) | 0.707 | |
| Number of medication | 3.00 (±1.155) | 2.83 (±0.753) | 1.000 | |
| Follow-up period | 1.844 (±0.600) | 1.82 (±0.904) | 0.976 |
p<0.05;
[18F]FDG-PET, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
n (%).
Mean (±SD).
Analysis of difference in post-surgical outcome between PET positive and negative groups
| PET | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Negative | Positive | ||||
| Post-surgical out-come | Favorable | Count (n) | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| % within PET | 83.3% | 42.9% | 61.5% | ||
| Unfavorable | Count (n) | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| % within PET | 16.7% | 57.1% | 38.5% | ||
| Total | Count (n) | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
| % within PET | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
Odd ratio for outcome was 6.667, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.487–91.331. p-value of statistical significance between the presence of PET lesion and post-surgical outcome by Fisher’s exact test was 0.266.
PET, Positron emission tomography.
Figure 1.Number of [18F]FDG-PET positive and negative patients1 according to the post-surgical outcome.