Literature DB >> 24649024

Comparison between artificial neural network and Cox regression model in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.

Lucheng Zhu1, Wenhua Luo1, Meng Su1, Hangping Wei1, Juan Wei1, Xuebang Zhang1, Changlin Zou1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors and their significance in gastric cancer (GC) patients, using the artificial neural network (ANN) and Cox regression hazard (CPH) models. A retrospective analysis was undertaken, including 289 patients with GC who had undergone gastrectomy between 2006 and 2007. According to the CPH analysis, disease stage, peritoneal dissemination, radical surgery and body mass index (BMI) were selected as the significant variables. According to the ANN model, disease stage, radical surgery, serum CA19-9 levels, peritoneal dissemination and BMI were selected as the significant variables. The true prediction of the ANN was 85.3% and of the CPH model 81.9%. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the ANN model is a more powerful tool in determining the significant prognostic variables for GC patients, compared to the CPH model. Therefore, this model is recommended for determining the risk factors of such patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox regression hazard; artificial neural network; gastric cancer/carcinoma; multivariate analysis; prognosis

Year:  2013        PMID: 24649024      PMCID: PMC3917700          DOI: 10.3892/br.2013.140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Rep        ISSN: 2049-9434


  17 in total

1.  Determining of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Akbar Biglarian; Ebrahim Hajizadeh; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad; Farid Zayeri
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010

2.  Assessment of gastric cancer survival: using an artificial hierarchical neural network.

Authors:  Zohreh Amiri; Kazem Mohammad; Mahmoud Mahmoudi; Hojjat Zeraati; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-15

3.  Metastatic/resected lymph nodes ratio-based classification in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Halil Ozgüç; Yalçin Sönmez; Omer Yerci
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma treated in remote island hospitals in Japan: a multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Makoto Toneri; Yojiro Mitsumoto; Morikazu Shimabukuro; Tsuyoshi Sunagawa; Tetsuya Itagaki; Shinya Iida; Taichi Kondo; Kosho Matsuura; Junichi Okeda; Dipok Kumar Dhar
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  A model to predict 3-month mortality risk of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure using artificial neural network.

Authors:  M-H Zheng; K-Q Shi; X-F Lin; D-D Xiao; L-L Chen; W-Y Liu; Y-C Fan; Y-P Chen
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.728

7.  Report of incidence and mortality in China cancer registries, 2009.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Siwei Zhang; Ping Zhao; Guanglin Li; Lingyou Wu; Jie He
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  The application of artificial neural networks and decision tree model in predicting post-operative complication for gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Chien; Yi-Chih Lee; Tsochiang Ma; Tian-Shyug Lee; Yang-Chu Lin; Weu Wang; Wei-Jei Lee
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 May-Jun

9.  Application of artificial neural network in predicting the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  A Biglarian; E Hajizadeh; A Kazemnejad; Mr Zali
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Clinical implications of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Caigang Liu; Ping Lu; Yang Lu; Huimian Xu; Shubao Wang; Junqing Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mustafa Bektaş; George L Burchell; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Funda Secik Arkin; Gulfidan Aras; Elif Dogu
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 3.  Complementarity of Clinician Judgment and Evidence Based Models in Medical Decision Making: Antecedents, Prospects, and Challenges.

Authors:  Zhou Lulin; Ethel Yiranbon; Henry Asante Antwi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Improving Gastric Cancer Outcome Prediction Using Single Time-Point Artificial Neural Network Models.

Authors:  Hamid Nilsaz-Dezfouli; Mohd Rizam Abu-Bakar; Jayanthi Arasan; Mohd Bakri Adam; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-02-16

5.  Comparison of three data mining models for prediction of advanced schistosomiasis prognosis in the Hubei province.

Authors:  Guo Li; Xiaorong Zhou; Jianbing Liu; Yuanqi Chen; Hengtao Zhang; Yanyan Chen; Jianhua Liu; Hongbo Jiang; Junjing Yang; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-02-15

6.  Assessment of risk based on variant pathways and establishment of an artificial neural network model of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Yinlong Zhao; Lingzhi Zhao; Tiezhu Mao; Lili Zhong
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.103

7.  Prediction of survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer using machine learning methods.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Jeong Won Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Ju Hyun Kim; Mijung Kim; Tae Joong Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Byoung Gie Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Sung Wook Seo
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Application and Performance of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oral Cancer Diagnosis and Prediction of Prognosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sanjeev B Khanagar; Sachin Naik; Abdulaziz Abdullah Al Kheraif; Satish Vishwanathaiah; Prabhadevi C Maganur; Yaser Alhazmi; Shazia Mushtaq; Sachin C Sarode; Gargi S Sarode; Alessio Zanza; Luca Testarelli; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31

9.  The Application of Classification and Regression Trees for the Triage of Women for Referral to Colposcopy and the Estimation of Risk for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Study Based on 1625 Cases with Incomplete Data from Molecular Tests.

Authors:  Abraham Pouliakis; Efrossyni Karakitsou; Charalampos Chrelias; Asimakis Pappas; Ioannis Panayiotides; George Valasoulis; Maria Kyrgiou; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Petros Karakitsos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Predicting the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Usingzzm321990Artificial and Bayesian Neural Networks

Authors:  Azam Korhani Kangi; Abbas Bahrampour
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.