Won-Gyu Yoo1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University and Elderly Life Redesign Institute, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] In this study, we compared upper cervical flexion and cervical flexion angle of computer workers with upper trapezius and levator scapular pain. [Subject] Eight male computer workers with upper trapezius muscle pain and eight others with levator scapular muscle pain participated. [Methods] Each subject was assessed in terms of upper cervical flexion angle and total cervical flexion angles using a cervical range of motion instrument after one hour of computer work. [Results] The upper cervical flexion angle of the group with levator scapular pain was significantly lower than that of the group with upper trapezius pain after computer work. The total cervical flexion angle of the group with upper trapezius pain was significantly lower than that of the group with levator scapular pain after computer work. [Conclusion] For selective and effective intervention for neck pain, therapists should evaluate upper and lower cervical motion individually.
[Purpose] In this study, we compared upper cervical flexion and cervical flexion angle of computer workers with upper trapezius and levator scapular pain. [Subject] Eight male computer workers with upper trapezius muscle pain and eight others with levator scapular muscle pain participated. [Methods] Each subject was assessed in terms of upper cervical flexion angle and total cervical flexion angles using a cervical range of motion instrument after one hour of computer work. [Results] The upper cervical flexion angle of the group with levator scapular pain was significantly lower than that of the group with upper trapezius pain after computer work. The total cervical flexion angle of the group with upper trapezius pain was significantly lower than that of the group with levator scapular pain after computer work. [Conclusion] For selective and effective intervention for neck pain, therapists should evaluate upper and lower cervical motion individually.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cervical range of motion; Neck pain; Upper cervical flexion
Many people spend long hours working at computers, and experience increased work-related
neck and shoulder discomfort1). Computer
workers commonly complain of pain in the upper trapezius and/or levator scapular
muscles1,2,3). Previous research has shown
a positive relationship between activation of the upper trapezius muscle and flexion of the
cervical spine muscles during computer operation3,
4). Cervical motion is now considered to
consist of upper cervical motion and lower cervical motion5). Increased forward head movement, specifically combined with lower
cervical flexion and upper cervical extension, might result in tightness of the cervical
extensors as well as increased compressive forces in the articulations of the cervical
spine2, 4). Thus, therapists should evaluate upper and lower cervical motion
separately in computer workers with neck pain; however, few studies have assessed this. The
upper trapezius and levator scapular muscles can become painful after computer work2, 5).
These muscles are also important in the treatment of neck pain2). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the upper
cervical flexion and cervical flexion angles of computer workers with upper trapezius and
levator scapular pain.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Eight male computer workers with upper trapezius muscle pain (21–30 years old; mean height
174.7±3.2 cm; mean weight 65.0±5.9 kg) and eight others with levator scapular muscle pain
(21–30 years old; mean height 175.7±4.0 cm; mean weight 67.2±6.6 kg) participated in this
study. The upper trapezius and levator scapular pain groups were defined as the subjects
with a pressure pain threshold below 6 lb in the respective muscles. A dolorimeter pressure
algometer (Fabrication Enterprises, White Plains, NY, USA) was used to measure pressure
pain. The dolorimeter consists of a metal probe that can measure pressures up to 20 lb in
0.25 lb increments. A 1 cm2 rubber plate delivers the pressure of the probe to
the body, and the pressure is read on a needle gauge. In this study, the pressure was
applied with the dolorimeter at a right angle to the body to measure the pressure pain
threshold. All subjects provided their informed consent before participating in the study.
This study was approved by the Inje University Faculty of Health Sciences Human Ethics
Committee. Each participant was assessed in terms of upper cervical flexion angle and total
cervical flexion angle using a cervical range of motion instrument (CROM; Performance
Attainment Associates, St. Paul, MN, USA) with two gravity goniometers that was attached to
the subject’s head. The sagittal- and frontal-plane gravity goniometers measure flexion
extension and lateral flexion, respectively. Each participant was seated on a standard
folding chair and fitted with the CROM device. For the selective upper cervical flexion
angle measurement, a pressure biofeedback unit was placed between the wall and the subject’s
lower cervical region (C5–7). In this position, the plastic bag was inflated to a pressure
of 20 mmHg during upper cervical flexion motion. The CROM was measured after 1 h of computer
work. All subjects performed VDT work for 1 h using the same computer workstation, with the
liquid crystal display monitor inclined backward by 20°, the eyes 0.8 m from the monitor,
and the top of the monitor 20° below eye level. An adjustable-height table and a chair with
no backrest were used to establish the initial sitting posture, to ensure that the hips and
knees were flexed at 90°. The subjects performed selected computer work using the program
Hansoft. The SPSS software (ver. 18.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze
differences in upper cervical flexion angle and cervical flexion angle between the two
groups after computer work using the independent t-test; statistical significance was
accepted for values of p < 0.05.
RESULTS
The upper cervical flexion angle of the group with levator scapular pain (10.5±3.0 degrees)
was significantly lower than that of the group with upper trapezius pain (15.2±2.1 degrees)
after computer work (p < 0.05). The total cervical flexion angle of the group with upper
trapezius pain (52.0±3.2 degrees) was significantly lower than that of the group with
levator scapular pain (56.9±4.0 degrees) after computer work (p < 0.05).
DISCUSSION
According to our results, the upper cervical flexion angle decreased more in the group with
levator scapular pain after computer work. The levator scapular is attached to the posterior
tubercles of the transverse processes of C1–45). Thus, tightness or pain in the levator scapular muscle is
associated with limitations in upper cervical motion. Our results show that the cervical
flexion angle of the group with upper trapezius pain decreased more after computer work. The
upper trapezius originates at the external occipital protuberance, the medial third of the
superior nuchal line, the ligamentum nuchae, and the spinous process of the seventh cervical
vertebra5). Thus, tightness or pain in
the upper trapezius is associated with total cervical range of motion limitation. In the
clinic, therapists typically recommend total cervical range of motion exercises for neck and
shoulder pain. However, we suggest that a treatment approach for the upper cervical portion
is needed for computer workers with levator scapular muscle pain. Computer workers with
upper trapezius pain also need lower cervical motion exercises, because the lower cervical
range of motion represents a larger proportion (−70%) of total cervical motion than does
upper motion (−30%)5, 6). Thus, an intervention or rehabilitation to address limitations in
total cervical range of motion must first include an intensive approach for recovery of
lower cervical motion. For selective and effective intervention for neck pain, therapists
should evaluate upper and lower cervical motion individually. To enable this, researchers
should develop a new device such as an upper cervical range of motion measurement tool. A
limitation of this study was that we didn’t measure the initial cervical angle, so only the
difference in cervical range of motion between the two groups could be shown.
Authors: C S Enwemeka; I M Bonet; J A Ingle; S Prudhithumrong; F E Ogbahon; N A Gbenedio Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 1986 Impact factor: 4.751