| Literature DB >> 24648644 |
Yukio Yanagisawa1, Yoshimi Matsuo2, Hisato Shuntoh3, Noriaki Horiuchi4.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of expiratory resistive loading on orbicularis oris muscle activity. [Subjects] Subjects were 23 healthy individuals (11 males, mean age 25.5±4.3 years; 12 females, mean age 25.0±3.0 years). [Methods] Surface electromyography was performed to measure the activity of the orbicularis oris muscle during maximum lip closure and resistive loading at different expiratory pressures. Measurement was performed at 10%, 30%, 50%, and 100% of maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) for all subjects. The t-test was used to compare muscle activity between maximum lip closure and 100% MEP, and analysis of variance followed by multiple comparisons was used to compare the muscle activities observed at different expiratory pressures.Entities:
Keywords: Expiratory resistance load; Orbicularis oris muscle; Surface electromyography
Year: 2014 PMID: 24648644 PMCID: PMC3944301 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Subject characteristics
| Males (n=11) | Females (n=12) | |
| Age (years) | 25.5±4.3 | 25.0±3.0 |
| Height (cm) | 170.4±5.5 | 158.2±3.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 62.4±6.7 | 51.8±6.3 |
| MEP (cmH2O) | 126.9±19.8 | 85.42±10.9* |
| Maximum lip closure (N) | 16.6±3.6 | 12.7±1.6 * |
MEP: Maximum expiratory pressure. Mean±SD. Two-sample t-test. *: p<0.01, compared with males.
Comparison of electromyogram root mean square value between maximum lip closure and 100% MEP
| Maximum lip closure | 100% MEP | |
| Males | 0.183±0.022 | 0.191±0.027 |
| Females | 0.133±0.032 | 0.133±0.034 |
MEP: Maximum expiratory pressure. Mean±SD. paired t-test.
Comparison of electromyogram root mean square values among expiratory pressure conditions
| 100%MEP | 10% MEP | 30% MEP | 50% MEP | |
| Males | 0.191±0.027 | 0.088±0.036* | 0.112±0.032*† | 0.135±0.033 *†# |
| Females | 0.133±0.034 | 0.052±0.018* | 0.070±0.019 *† | 0.094±0.025 *†# |
MEP: Maximum expiratory pressure. Mean±SD. Repeated measures analysis of variance: p<0.01. Bonferroni post hoc comparisons. *: p<0.01, compared with values at 100% MEP. †: p<0.01, compared with values at 10% MEP. #: p<0.01, compared with values at 30% MEP.