Literature DB >> 24648424

Postoperative pain control: videothoracoscopic versus conservative mini-thoracotomic approach.

Claudio Andreetti1, Cecilia Menna2, Mohsen Ibrahim3, Anna Maria Ciccone3, Antonio D'Andrilli3, Federico Venuta4, Erino Angelo Rendina5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The management of postoperative pain in thoracic surgery is an open issue. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain after a videothoracoscopic lobectomy versus a mini-thoracotomy approach.
METHODS: Between April 2011 and January 2013 we enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized study 145 patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with lymphadenectomy for Stage I lung cancer. In 75 cases (Group A), surgery was performed through a videothoracoscopic approach. In 70 cases (Group B), surgery was undertaken through a conservative mini-thoracotomy. Pain was assessed by visual analogue scale and lung function by spirometry and six-minute walking test (6MWT) before surgery, at 48 h and 1 month after surgery.
RESULTS: Patients were stratified by age, sex, lung function, type and duration of surgery. Length of hospital stay (median, days) was 4 for Group A and 6 for Group B (P = 0.088). The differences between mean postoperative pain values were significant at 1, 12, 24 and 48 h (6.24 vs 8.74, 5.16 vs 7.66, 4.19 vs 6.89 and 2.23 vs 5.33; P = 0.000). In Group A, mean preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second values were 2.65 ± 0.61, and 1.83 ± 0.65 and 2.09 ± 0.65, respectively, at 48 h and 1 month (P = 0.028); in Group B, they were 2.71 ± 0.71 preoperatively and 1.33 ± 0.52 and 1.82 ± 0.63, respectively, at 48 h and 1 month. In Group A, mean preoperative 6MWT values (m) were 426.85 ± 51.18, and 371.23 ± 55.36 and 392.07 ± 56.12, respectively, at 48 h and 1 month; in Group B, they were 421.76 ± 56.65 preoperatively and 312.03 ± 48.54 and 331.83 ± 47.99, respectively, at 48 h and 1 month (P = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: The videothoracoscopic approach in the treatment of Stage I lung cancer reduces postoperative pain, which seems to allow a rapid functional recovery of patients.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain; Thoracotomy; Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24648424     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  22 in total

1.  The era of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Monica Pastina; Cecilia Menna; Claudio Andreetti; Mohsen Ibrahim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Improving postoperative pain management after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resection contributes to enhanced recovery, but guidelines are still lacking.

Authors:  Marco Mercieri; Antonio D'Andrilli; Roberto Arcioni
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Flexible videoscope for thoracoscopic lobectomy: evolution of uniportal technique.

Authors:  Mohsen Ibrahim; Cecilia Menna; Claudio Andreetti; Antonio D'Andrilli; Anna Maria Ciccone; Giulio Maurizi; Francesco Cassiano; Erino Angelo Rendina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  VATS anatomic lung resections-the European experience.

Authors:  Sofina Begum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; Kostas Papagiannopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Uniportal video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: primary experience from an Eastern center.

Authors:  Mingxiang Feng; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Lijie Tan; Xuping Mao; Yi Liu; Qun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Electro-physiological evidence of intercostal nerve injury after thoracotomy: an experimental study in a sheep model.

Authors:  Ruoyu Zhang; Kerstin Schwabe; Marcus Krüger; Axel Haverich; Joachim K Krauss; Mesbah Alam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery pathways in thoracic surgery from Italian VATS Group: preoperative optimisation.

Authors:  Antonio D'Andrilli; Domenico Massullo; Erino A Rendina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Patient-Reported Symptom Interference as a Measure of Postsurgery Functional Recovery in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Xin Shelley Wang; Ara A Vaporciyan; David C Rice; Keyuri U Popat; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  Lung cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Federico Venuta; Daniele Diso; Ilaria Onorati; Marco Anile; Sara Mantovani; Erino A Rendina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Patient Preferences in Treatment Choices for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Betty C Tong; Scott Wallace; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Joel C Huber
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.