Literature DB >> 24648131

Pre-procedure ultrasound increases the success and safety of central venous catheterization†.

W Schummer1, J A Köditz2, C Schelenz1, K Reinhart1, S G Sakka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound (US) in central venous catheterization is superior to pre-procedure US. However, moving real-time US into routine practice is impeded by its perceived expense and difficulty. Currently, pre-procedure US and landmark (LM) methods are most widely used. We investigated these techniques in internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization in respect of operator experience, complications, and risk factors.
METHODS: In an observational non-randomized study, we investigated 606 of ∼1300 procedures, that is, 200 patients were treated under pre-procedure US and 406 under LM [pathfinder (PF) n=202, direct cannulation (DC) n=204]. We recorded first needle pass success rate, success rate after the third attempt, and the cannulation time. Procedures were performed by inexperienced (<100) or experienced (>100 catheterizations) operators.
RESULTS: Pre-procedure US was associated with more successful attempts and shorter cannulation times. Under pre-procedure US, 88% of first attempts were successful and 100% of third attempts. The median (range) cannulation time was 39 (10-330) s. Under PF, only 56% of first, and 87% of third, attempts were successful with a median (range) cannulation time of 100 (25-3600) s. Under DC, 61% of first and 89% of third attempts were successful; the median (range) cannulation time was 70 (10-3600) s. Remarkably, inexperienced operators using pre-procedure US (n=38) were significantly faster than experienced operators using PF or DC (n=343) (cannulation time: median 60 s, range 12-330, for inexperienced; 60 s, range 10-3600, for experienced). First puncture success rates were higher (pre-procedure US, inexperienced 84%, PF or DC, experienced 57%).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedure US for IJV catheterization is safe, quick, and superior to LM.
© The Author [2014]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cannulation time; central venous catheterization; complications; internal jugular vein; success rate; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24648131     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  5 in total

1.  Does pre-procedure ultrasound increase the success and safety of right internal jugular venous catheterization? An intervention study.

Authors:  Vikrant Ghode; Naresh Dhawan; R M Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2019-07-12

2.  Comparison of short and long axis ultrasound-guided approaches to internal jugular vein puncture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Xiaohan Wang; Shuai Miao; Mengzhu Shi; Guanglei Wang; Qing Tu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  The risk of fatal bleeding complications in jugular catheterization in patients with coagulopathy: A retrospective analysis of death cases in closed claims and the Medical Accident Investigating System in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Otaki; Naofumi Fujishiro; Yasuaki Oyama; Naoko Hata; Daisuke Kato; Shoji Kawachi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Practical guide for safe central venous catheterization and management 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Comparison of different approaches to combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) under the guidance of ultrasound in cesarean delivery of obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yilu Zhou; Wei Chen; Shuangqiong Zhou; Yiyi Tao; Zhendong Xu; Zhiqiang Liu
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.175

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.