| Literature DB >> 24647736 |
Peng Chen1, Fumihiko Takeuchi2, Jong-Young Lee3, Huaixing Li4, Jer-Yuarn Wu5, Jun Liang6, Jirong Long7, Yasuharu Tabara8, Mark O Goodarzi9, Mark A Pereira10, Young Jin Kim3, Min Jin Go3, Daniel O Stram11, Eranga Vithana12, Chiea-Chuen Khor13, Jianjun Liu14, Jiemin Liao15, Xingwang Ye4, Yiqin Wang4, Ling Lu4, Terri L Young16, Jeannette Lee1, Ah Chuan Thai17, Ching-Yu Cheng18, Rob M van Dam19, Yechiel Friedlander20, Chew-Kiat Heng21, Woon-Puay Koh22, Chien-Hsiun Chen5, Li-Ching Chang23, Wen-Harn Pan23, Qibin Qi24, Masato Isono2, Wei Zheng7, Qiuyin Cai7, Yutang Gao25, Ken Yamamoto26, Keizo Ohnaka27, Ryoichi Takayanagi28, Yoshikuni Kita29, Hirotsugu Ueshima30, Chao A Hsiung31, Jinrui Cui9, Wayne H-H Sheu32, Jerome I Rotter33, Yii-Der I Chen33, Chris Hsu11, Yukinori Okada34, Michiaki Kubo35, Atsushi Takahashi36, Toshihiro Tanaka37, Frank J A van Rooij38, Santhi K Ganesh39, Jinyan Huang40, Tao Huang40, Jianmin Yuan41, Joo-Yeon Hwang42, Myron D Gross43, Themistocles L Assimes44, Tetsuro Miki45, Xiao-Ou Shu7, Lu Qi46, Yuan-Tson Chen47, Xu Lin4, Tin Aung48, Tien-Yin Wong15, Yik-Ying Teo49, Bong-Jo Kim3, Norihiro Kato2, E-Shyong Tai50.
Abstract
Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is used as a measure of glycemic control and also as a diagnostic criterion for diabetes. To discover novel loci harboring common variants associated with HbA1c in East Asians, we conducted a meta-analysis of 13 genome-wide association studies (GWAS; N = 21,026). We replicated our findings in three additional studies comprising 11,576 individuals of East Asian ancestry. Ten variants showed associations that reached genome-wide significance in the discovery data set, of which nine (four novel variants at TMEM79 [P value = 1.3 × 10(-23)], HBS1L/MYB [8.5 × 10(-15)], MYO9B [9.0 × 10(-12)], and CYBA [1.1 × 10(-8)] as well as five variants at loci that had been previously identified [CDKAL1, G6PC2/ABCB11, GCK, ANK1, and FN3KI]) showed consistent evidence of association in replication data sets. These variants explained 1.76% of the variance in HbA1c. Several of these variants (TMEM79, HBS1L/MYB, CYBA, MYO9B, ANK1, and FN3K) showed no association with either blood glucose or type 2 diabetes. Among individuals with nondiabetic levels of fasting glucose (<7.0 mmol/L) but elevated HbA1c (≥6.5%), 36.1% had HbA1c <6.5% after adjustment for these six variants. Our East Asian GWAS meta-analysis has identified novel variants associated with HbA1c as well as demonstrated that the effects of known variants are largely transferable across ethnic groups. Variants affecting erythrocyte parameters rather than glucose metabolism may be relevant to the use of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes in these populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24647736 PMCID: PMC4284402 DOI: 10.2337/db13-1815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Demographics of the participant cohorts
| Study name | Design | Ethnicity | Age, mean (SD) | Male, % | BMI, mean (SD) | HbA1c | λGC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %, mean (SD) | IFCC, | ||||||||
| Stage 1 | 21,026 | 5.7 (0.6) | 39 (6.6) | ||||||
| CRC | 640 | Population | Chinese | 43.9 (7.7) | 24.7 | 22.4 (2.2) | 5.5 (0.4) | 37 (4.4) | 1.020 |
| KARE | 7,696 | Population | Korean | 51.6 (8.8) | 46.6 | 24.5 (3.8) | 5.6 (0.4) | 38 (4.4) | 1.052 |
| CAGE-NCGM | 323 | Population | Japanese | 63.0 (6.1) | 53.6 | 22.9 (2.9) | 5.2 (0.3) | 33 (3.3) | 1.001 |
| NHAPC | 2,507 | Population | Chinese | 58.5 (6.0) | 42.4 | 24.3 (3.6) | 5.7 (0.4) | 39 (4.4) | 1.005 |
| SCES | 1,580 | Population | Chinese | 57.7 (9.4) | 42.2 | 23.5 (3.5) | 5.8 (0.3) | 40 (3.3) | 1.002 |
| SiMES | 1,727 | Population | Malay | 57.6 (11.2) | 33.9 | 25.8 (5.1) | 5.7 (0.4) | 39 (4.4) | 1.007 |
| SP2–610 | 797 | Population | Chinese | 47.4 (10.6) | 17.0 | 22.2 (3.7) | 5.6 (0.4) | 38 (4.4) | 1.027 |
| SP2–1M | 777 | Population | Chinese | 46.7 (10.1) | 61.5 | 22.8 (3.4) | 5.6 (0.4) | 38 (4.4) | 1.006 |
| SP2–550 | 266 | Population | Chinese | 48.3 (12.2) | 66.0 | 23.3 (3.5) | 5.6 (0.4) | 38 (4.4) | 0.992 |
| TWSC | 920 | Population | Chinese | 50.0 (17.8) | 50.8 | 23.6 (3.5) | 5.2 (0.4) | 33 (4.4) | 1.010 |
| SCHS-CHD | 1,024 | MI controls | Chinese | 60.1 (8.0) | 67.6 | 22.9 (3.1) | 5.7 (0.4) | 39 (4.4) | 0.998 |
| 457 | MI cases | Chinese | 59.8 (7.8) | 63.0 | 22.6 (2.9) | 5.7 (0.4) | 39 (4.4) | 1.008 | |
| SBCS | 303 | BC controls | Chinese | 53.0 (8.4) | 0.0 | 24.7 (5.1) | 5.8 (0.4) | 40 (4.4) | 1.012 |
| SCHS-DB | 2,009 | T2D controls | Chinese | 55.2 (7.1) | 46.7 | 22.7 (3.1) | 5.5 (0.3) | 37 (3.3) | — |
| Stage 2 | 11,576 | ||||||||
| TaiChi | 1,984 | Population | Chinese | 68.6 (9.0) | 49.7 | 24.3 (3.4) | 5.8 (0.3) | 40 (3.3) | 1.09 |
| CAGE-Fukuoka | 4,880 | Population | Japanese | 63.8 (5.8) | 46.2 | 22.7 (2.7) | 4.8 (0.2) | 29 (2.2) | NA |
| JMGP | 4,712 | Population | Japanese | 59.5 (14.3) | 35.6 | 22.8 (3.1) | 5.5 (0.4) | 37 (4.4) | NA |
The participant cohorts are listed in stage 1 (genome-wide association test) and stage 2 (de novo genotyping), respectively. Age, BMI, and HbA1c are given as the mean value and SE in each cohort. λGC is the inflation factor calculated as per genomic control. CAGE, Cardiovascular Genomic Epidemiology; CRC, Cardiometabolic Risk in Chinese; JMGP, Japanese Millenium Genome Project; KARE, Korea Association Resource; NCGM, National Center for Global Health and Medicine; NHAPC, Nutrition and Health of Aging Population in China; SBCS, Shanghai Breast Cancer Study; SCES, Singapore Chinese Eye Study; SCHS-CHD, Singapore Chinese Health Study of Coronary Heart Disease; SCHS-DB, Singapore Chinese Health Study of Diabetes Mellitus; SiMES, Singapore Malay Eye Study; SP2, Singapore Progressive Study Program; TWSC, Taiwan Super Control Study.
1The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry unit for HbA1c is mmol/mol.
Association of the top hits of stage 1 and stage 2 in East Asians
| SNP | Gene | Chr | Base pair position | Alleles | Stage | Risk allele frequency | Effect (SE) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novel loci | |||||||||
| rs6684514 | TMEM79 | 1 | 154,522,080 | G/A | 1 | 0.75 | 0.09 (0.01) | 1.1E-15 | 20,831 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 0.09 (0.02) | 2.1E-09 | 9,494 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.76 | 0.09 (0.01) | 1.3E-23 | 30,325 | |||||
| rs9399137 | HBS1L/MYB | 6 | 135,460,711 | T/C | 1 | 0.72 | 0.06 (0.01) | 1.9E-08 | 20,535 |
| 2 | 0.65 | 0.07 (0.01) | 7.6E-08 | 9,501 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.69 | 0.07 (0.01) | 8.5E-15 | 30,036 | |||||
| rs1467311 | 9q31.2 | 9 | 109,576,753 | G/A | 1 | 0.22 | 0.07 (0.01) | 2.9E-08 | 20,845 |
| 2 | 0.24 | 0.01 (0.01) | 3.5E-01 | 11,474 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.23 | 0.04 (0.01) | 1.0E-06 | 32,319 | |||||
| rs540078 | PSMD13 | 11 | 244,256 | T/C | 1 | 0.46 | 0.04 (0.01) | 6.2E-06 | 20,865 |
| 2 | 0.39 | 0.01 (0.01) | 4.1E-01 | 9,485 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.44 | 0.03 (0.01) | 3.2E-05 | 30,350 | |||||
| rs174570 | FADS2 | 11 | 61,353,788 | C/T | 1 | 0.52 | 0.05 (0.01) | 5.4E-07 | 20,639 |
| 2 | 0.59 | 0.03 (0.01) | 3.8E-02 | 11,524 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.55 | 0.04 (0.01) | 2.0E-07 | 32,163 | |||||
| rs9933309 | CYBA | 16 | 87,372,433 | C/T | 1 | 0.64 | 0.08 (0.01) | 3.3E-08 | 11,015 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 0.05 (0.03) | 1.1E-01 | 1,983 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.63 | 0.07 (0.01) | 1.1E-08 | 12,998 | |||||
| rs11667918 | MYO9B | 19 | 17,093,499 | C/T | 1 | 0.61 | 0.06 (0.01) | 1.9E-10 | 20,835 |
| 2 | 0.65 | 0.04 (0.01) | 3.7E-03 | 9,516 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.62 | 0.06 (0.01) | 9.0E-12 | 30,351 | |||||
| Known loci | |||||||||
| rs3755157 | G6PC2/ABCB11 | 2 | 169,500,417 | T/C | 1 | 0.34 | 0.07 (0.01) | 2.8E-11 | 20,630 |
| rs7772603 | CDKAL1 | 6 | 20,773,925 | C/T | 1 | 0.42 | 0.06 (0.01) | 3.5E-08 | 19,156 |
| rs1799884 | GCK | 7 | 44,195,593 | T/C | 1 | 0.19 | 0.12 (0.01) | 1.5E-22 | 20,874 |
| rs4737009 | ANK1 | 8 | 41,749,562 | A/G | 1 | 0.50 | 0.09 (0.01) | 1.3E-15 | 20,558 |
| 2 | 0.54 | 0.05 (0.03) | 1.4E-01 | 1,984 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.51 | 0.08 (0.01) | 1.1E-15 | 22,542 | |||||
| rs1046875 | FN3K | 17 | 78,278,715 | A/G | 1 | 0.49 | 0.08 (0.01) | 1.6E-14 | 20,871 |
| 2 | 0.52 | 0.11 (0.03) | 2.6E-04 | 1,984 | |||||
| 1+2 | 0.49 | 0.08 (0.01) | 3.8E-17 | 22,855 |
The index SNPs were grouped into novel loci that were first discovered in our study and known loci that have been reported in previous publications. Gene refers to the most relevant gene within each locus. The cytoband of 9q31.2 was designated to rs1467311 since no gene was found in the 400 Kb flanking region nearby. Alleles are given as the effect allele/other allele. Effect and SE are the risk and its SE, respectively. For the novel loci, association result were given for the stage 1, stage 2, and the meta-analyzed stage 1 and stage 2, indicated as 1, 2, and 1+2, respectively. Chr, chromosome number.
*The index SNPs showed genome-wide significance in stage 1.
Figure 1Manhattan plot of genome-wide meta-analysis of stage 1 cohorts. The −log10 of the association P values (y-axis) are plotted against the genomic coordinates (x-axis). The horizontal line in the plot indicates the genome-wide significance (5 × 10−8). The most relevant gene of each signal was labeled on the top of it, with the novel loci presented in brown and known loci in blue.
Figure 2The bivariate plot of the effect directions in our meta-analysis and in previous reports. For the index SNPs in the previous GWAS, we plotted the reported effect (x-axis) versus the AGEN effect (y-axis). Whenever available, we used the effects reported by Soranzo et al. (3). The solid dots represent the SNPs that were significant (P value ≤0.05) in our study, while the hollow red dots represent the insignificant ones. The CDKAL1 top SNP reported in Koreans was specially marked by a diamond. EA, East Asian.
Figure 3Regional association plots of the novel loci. The −log10 of association P values are plotted against the genomic coordinates. The index SNPs are indicated in purple, with circles for stage 1 and squares for stage 1+2. Other SNPs are colored from red to blue as per their LD with the index SNP. Chr, chromosome.
Individual reclassification using raw HbA1c or adjusted HbA1c
| Adjusted HbA1c | Subtotal | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <6.5 | ≥6.5 | |||
| Fasting plasma glucose ≥7 | ||||
| HbA1c <6.5 | 57 | 1 | 58 | 181 |
| HbA1c ≥6.5 | 3 | 120 | 123 | |
| Fasting plasma glucose <7 | ||||
| HbA1c <6.5 | 13,813 | 40 | 13,853 | 14,329 |
| HbA1c ≥6.5 | 172 | 304 | 476 | |
The reclassification analysis was done in cohorts with fasting glucose measurement. Individuals with known diabetic history or diabetic medication were removed. In the remaining subjects, undiagnosed diabetes was defined as those having fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/L, whereas the nondiabetic individuals had fasting glucose <7 mmol/L. We adjusted the raw HbA1c levels using a linear regression, including the allele dosages of the six SNPs as covariates. We then classified individuals into those with and without diabetes based on HbA1c ≥6.5% (15). We compared the concordance between these three methods for diagnosing diabetes (fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥6.5%, and HbA1c adjusted for these six SNPs ≥6.5%). HbA1c was adjusted on the nonglycemic index SNPs. The subtotal is the number of individuals in each HbA1c category. The reclassification rate in each HbA1c category is the ratio of the number of individuals reclassified after adjustment for the six SNPs to the subtotal. The total is the number of individuals in each fasting plasma glucose category.