Literature DB >> 24647563

Occupational lifting during pregnancy and child's birth size in a large cohort study.

Mette Juhl1, Pernille Stemann Larsen, Per Kragh Andersen, Susanne Wulff Svendsen, Jens Peter Bonde, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Katrine Strandberg-Larsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that the handling of heavy loads during pregnancy is associated with impaired fetal growth. We examined the association between quantity and frequency of maternal occupational lifting and the child's size at birth, measured by weight, length, ponderal index, small-for-gestational-age (SGA), abdominal circumference, head circumference, and placental weight.
METHODS: We analyzed birth size from the Danish Medical Birth Registry of 66 693 live-born children in the Danish National Birth Cohort according to the mother's self-reported information on occupational lifting from telephone interviews around gestational week 16. Data were collected in the period 1996-2002. We used linear and logistic regression models and adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: In the fully adjusted models, most of the mean differences in birth size measures had values indicating a smaller size of offspring among women with occupational lifting versus women with no lifting, but the differences were very small, and there was a statistically significant trend only for placental weight showing lighter weight with increasing number of kilos lifted per day. In jobs likely to include person-lifting, we found increased odds of SGA among children of women who lifted 501-1000 kilos per day [odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.98-1.83] and >1000 kilos per day (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.83-2.76) compared to no lifting. In jobs with no person-lifting, occupational lifting was not associated with SGA.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we observed no strong support for an association between maternal occupational lifting and impaired size at birth. Our data indicated a potential association between lifting and SGA among offspring of women in occupations that are likely to include person-lifting. These results should, however, be interpreted with caution due to limited statistical power, and we suggest that future studies include detailed, individual information on job functions and ergonomic routines of lifting procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24647563     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  5 in total

1.  The Danish Medical Birth Register.

Authors:  Mette Bliddal; Anne Broe; Anton Pottegård; Jørn Olsen; Jens Langhoff-Roos
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Combined exposure to lifting and psychosocial strain at work and adverse pregnancy outcomes-A study in the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Camilla Sandal Sejbaek; Hans Bay; Ann Dyreborg Larsen; Petter Kristensen; Vivi Schlünssen; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Jens Peter Bonde; Mette Juhl; Karin Sørig Hougaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Usability and Usefulness of a Mobile Health App for Pregnancy-Related Work Advice: Mixed-Methods Approach.

Authors:  Monique van Beukering; Adeline Velu; Liesbeth van den Berg; Marjolein Kok; Ben Willem Mol; Monique Frings-Dresen; Robert de Leeuw; Joris van der Post; Linda Peute
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Adverse perinatal outcomes among practical nurses: The Finnish Medical Birth Register Study.

Authors:  Emma Kwegyir-Afful; Reeta Lamminpää; Kimmo Räsänen; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen; Tuomas Selander; Mika Gissler
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study.

Authors:  Monique van Beukering; Adeline Velu; Lydia Henrike Nicole Schonewille; Ruben Duijnhoven; Ben Willem Mol; Teus Brand; Monique Frings-Dresen; Marjolein Kok
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.