| Literature DB >> 24647312 |
Ling Zhang1, Hong Wang2, Jianwen Zou3, William E Rogers4, Evan Siemann1.
Abstract
Litter decomposition is a fundamental ecosystem process in which breakdown and decay of plant detritus releases carbon and nutrients. Invasive exotic plants may produce litter that differs from native plant litter in quality and quantity. Such differences may impact litter decomposition and soil respiration in ways that depend on whether exotic and native plant litters decompose in mixtures. However, few field experiments have examined how exotic plants affect soil respiration via litter decomposition. Here, we conducted an in situ study of litter decomposition of an annual native grass (Eragrostis pilosa), a perennial exotic forb (Alternanthera philoxeroides), and their mixtures in an annual grassland in China to examine potential invasion effects on soil respiration. Alternanthera litter decomposed faster than Eragrostis litter when each was incubated separately. Mass loss in litter mixes was more rapid than predicted from rates in single species bags (only 35% of predicted mass remained at 8 months) showing synergistic effects. Notably, exotic plant litter decomposition rate was unchanged but native plant litter decomposition rate was accelerated in mixtures (decay constant k = 0.20 month(-1)) compared to in isolation (k = 0.10 month(-1)). On average, every litter type increased soil respiration compared to bare soil from which litter was removed. However, the increases were larger for mixed litter (1.82 times) than for Alternanthera litter (1.58 times) or Eragrostis litter (1.30 times). Carbon released as CO2 relative to litter carbon input was also higher for mixed litter (3.34) than for Alternathera litter (2.29) or Eragrostis litter (1.19). Our results indicated that exotic Alternanthera produces rapidly decomposing litter which also accelerates the decomposition of native plant litter in litter mixtures and enhances soil respiration rates. Thus, this exotic invasive plant species will likely accelerate carbon cycling and increase soil respiration even at intermediate stages of invasion in these annual grasslands.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24647312 PMCID: PMC3960218 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Mean initial and final C:N ratio of Alternanthera and Eragrostis litter decomposing both alone and in mixture.
Means ±1 SE are shown.
ANOVAs for remaining litter mass as affected by species and litter mixing with time in the field incubation study.
| Single species | Mixed species | ||||
| Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
| Species | 1,12 |
|
|
|
|
| Time | 2,12 |
|
|
|
|
| Interaction | 2,12 |
|
|
|
|
| Model | 5,12 |
|
|
|
|
Significant results are shown in bold.
Figure 2Remaining mass (% initial) of native and invasive plant litter when each of them was decomposing alone (a) or in mixtures (b).
Dynamics of litter mass remaining between single-species and litter mixtures within Alternanthera and Eragrostis were presented in (c) and (d), respectively. Asterisks indicate time points when means were significantly different at α = 0.05.
Litter mass decay constants (k, month-1) during litter decomposition in single- (k) or mixed-species litterbags (k) after 8 months of decomposition in the field.
|
|
| |||||||||
| Species | Estimate | S.E. |
|
|
| Estimate | S.E. |
|
|
|
|
| 0.37 | 0.04 | 9.45 | <0.0001 | 0.97 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 9.12 | <0.0001 | 0.95 |
|
| 0.10 | 0.01 | 8.67 | <0.0001 | 0.89 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 6.00 | 0.0001 | 0.86 |
| Mean | 0.18 | 0.01 | 21.59 | <0.0001 | 0.95 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 19.65 | <0.0001 | 0.98 |
Values were calculated from a first order negative exponential model.
Expected and observed litter mass remaining (g) in mixed-species litter bags after field incubation for 3, 6 and 8 months.
| Litter mass remaining (g) | ||||
| Time | Expected | Observed |
|
|
|
| 5.99±0.46 | 5.38±0.07 | 1.39 | 0.2028 |
|
| 3.30±0.05 | 2.08±0.10 |
|
|
|
| 3.33±0.25 | 1.17±0.14 |
|
|
Predicted remaining mass was calculated from litter mass measured in single-species litter bags. Means ± SE. Differences between predicted and observed values were examined by Student's t tests. Significant results are shown in bold.
Figure 3Monthly mean soil CO2 emission rates based on weekly measurements (a) and accumulated soil CO2 emissions (b) of soils with different litter types and soils without litter coverage (bare soil).